Saturday, December 31, 2011

General Pervez Musharraf's "Support" for Imran Khan:)

LAHORE: About 100 retired army officers are getting ready to join former president Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf`s All Pakistan Muslim League (APML) on his homecoming next month, Dawn has learnt. The former president is set to return but will announce the date of his arrival during his address to a public meeting to be held on January 8 in Karachi. `Yes, a good number of ex servicemen have shown their willingness to join my party on my return,` Gen Musharraf said in response to a question during a telephonic conversation with Dawn on Friday. Answering a question about the criticism levelled at him in the past by some members of the Ex-Servicemen Society, he said: `There were a few people who criticised me, but they have regretted their actions and now want to come along with me,` he said. He said he would address the public meeting in Karachi through teleconferencing equipment. `As I said earlier Iam determined to return to Pakistan. On the 8th I will announce the date of my return. The former president said he expected the government to make adequate security arrangements for him. `Security always remains an issue. I am making arrangements for my security… but the government should also ensure it,` he said. Mr Musharraf said he took all the cases against him seriously but was determined to return. `My legal team is working on the cases I am facing in Pakistan and let`s see what the courts decide. I am taking the cases seriously and the impression that I do not care about them is not correct. `However, the cases against me are baseless, as cases are filed in Pakistan without any concrete reason,` he said. About Imran Khan`s reported statement in which he ruled out any alliance with the APML, Mr Musharraf said: `I say thank you very much to Mr Khan… I want to break the political status quoand Imran is also struggling for this. In Pakistan, the political status quo is the PPP and the PML-N and we all should unite to break this. `And let me make it clear that if no one will come forward in this respect I will do it myself with the support of the people of Pakistan,` Gen Musharraf remarked. Sources told Dawn that Gen (retd) Musharraf had asked his legal team, including Mohammad Ali Saif and Fawad Chaudhry, to particularly pursue the case against him in an Anti-Terrorism Court that had issued arrest warrants for him in the Benazir Bhutto assassination case. The team was also likely to challenge the FIR registered against the general in the Akbar Bugti assassination case because the FC had carried out the operation against the late Baloch leader on the request of the Balochistan government. The sources said the former president would return by the end of next month. REFERENCE: 100 ex-army officers may join Musharraf`s party http://www.dawn.com/2011/12/31/100-ex-army-officers-may-join-musharrafs-party.html

Musharraf says Imran Khan Is better than all  (Jirga - GEO TV 2011)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyLzcugiyz8


The Salim Saifullah-led provincial chapter of the PML-Q followed the party guideline regarding support to the government. In addition, Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaaf (PTI), Tahirul Qadri’s Pakistan Awami Tehrik (PAT), Omar Asghar’s newly-launched Qaumi Jamhoori Party (QJP) and Fanoos Gujar’s little known Pakistan Awami Party (PAP) have also served as the king’s party. “On April 30, you have to support a bleak or bright future for Pakistan. If you are keen on a bright future for your next generation, you must stamp yes for Musharraf in the referendum,” Imran Khan reportedly said at a function in Peshawar. During their visit to various parts of the province, the ex-cricket star together with Tehrik-i- Insaaf’s provincial president, Nawabzada Mohsin Ali Khan, focused on the corruption of the former premiers in order to seek public support for the government. REFERENCE: Saviour of Pakistan, Musharraf Khan? By Amir Mohammed Khan 15 MAY 2002 http://www.newslinemagazine.com/2002/05/saviour-of-pakistan/

Pervez Musharraf Message for Imran Khan PTI Insaf (PTV - 2007)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NfbdiBTXKw

General Pervez Musharraf before the beginning of his speechGeneral Pervez Musharraf hopes the referendum will give his presidency legitimacy. A referendum win would allow him to remain in office until 2007 and he could well stay on even longer.After his coup in 1999, General Musharraf declared in a press conference that he would remain in office for just three years. But like many military rulers before him he is reluctant to give up power.He argues that his staying in office is the only way to ensure economic recovery, social stability and the eventual establishment of "true" democracy in Pakistan. But he is also motivated by a fear that, if he were to stand down in favour of democratically elected politicians, he could face a treason charge. The army has never been able to deny that the 1999 coup was unconstitutional.

Military precedent

A referendum win, however, might not give President Musharraf the legitimacy he is seeking. A former military ruler in Pakistan, General Zia, also called a referendum but the tactic brought him few benefits. In 1984, Zia put this question to the Pakistani people: "Do you endorse the process initiated by General Mohammed Zia ul Haq, the President of Pakistan, to bring in laws in conformity with the injunctions of Islam as laid down in the Holy Koran and Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) and for the preservation of the ideology of Pakistan".

Even though Zia won, the question was so loaded, and the turnout so low, he still faced sustained challenges from the politicians right up until the moment he died in suspicious circumstances in a 1988 air crash. President Musharraf has indicated that this time the referendum will be in the form of a simple "yes" or "no" question.But the military fears a low turn out. All the main political parties and religious groups have called for a boycott of the vote.

Politicians fight back

The politicians now believe the army will deny them power for the foreseeable future. When the referendum result is announced next month, the turn out figures will almost certainly be disputed. Ever since the 1999 coup, the major political parties have played a muted role, for the most part accommodating themselves to the military government. Now, President Musharraf is clearly determined to remain in power they are likely to oppose him with greater vigour. Under Pakistan's constitution, the president should be elected by the membership of the National Assembly and the Senate. The politicians had hoped that, after the parliamentary elections due this October, they could use that power to deny President Musharraf another term. But by opting for a referendum, President Musharraf is calculating that he will be able to by-pass the constitutional procedure and remain in office even if the politicians oppose him. REFERENCE: Analysis: Musharraf's referendum gamble Friday, 5 April, 2002, 20:34 GMT 21:34 UK http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1913990.stm 

Imran Khan & NATO - 1 (Bolta Pakistan - 26th Dec 2011)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=al-TNWkjg5c



Pakistani cricket legend-turned politician Imran Khan on Tuesday backed the referendum to be held next month to decide the future of President Pervez Musharraf but his fledgling Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf headed for trouble as some of its leaders have opposed it openly. After considerable dithering, Imran Khan declared that his party has decided to support Musharraf's referendum. In a statement issued from Karachi, Imran said he has decided to support the referendum as he believed that Musharraf wanted "to make Pakistan a modern Islamic, welfare state". Imran said his party wants to play its real role as "we desire that democracy is promoted in the country and a clean leadership come to the fore". Imran launched his party with a lot of fanfare in the last general elections but ended up in a great disappointment after he failed to win a single seat even though he himself contested 22 seats from different regions.

A bitter critic of former Prime Ministers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, Imran alleged that politicians in the country minted money through corruption during the last 12 years. The referendum has been opposed by all the major political parties including Bhutto's Pakistan Peoples Party, (PPP) and Sharif's Pakistan Muslim league (PML). While Imran announced the support to the referendum, a section of his party headed by General Secretary Miraj Muhammad Khan openly opposed the party decision to back it. Pakistan Daily quoted a party sources as saying that Miraj was bitterly critical of the party accepting the "undemocratic" move of Musharraf trying to get elected for a five year term through a referendum. REFERENCE: Imran backs Musharraf's referendum, party members oppose Press Trust of India Posted: Apr 09, 2002 at 1518 hrs IST http://www.expressindia.com/news/fullstory.php?newsid=9092 
Musharraf risks credibility in drive for election win Rivals call for boycott of Pakistani referendum Rory McCarthy in Islamabad The Guardian, Monday 29 April 2002 02.23 BST http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/apr/29/pakistan.rorymccarthy

Imran Khan & NATO - 2 (Bolta Pakistan - 26th Dec 2011)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8LtiDaUtk4


Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaaf chief Imran Khan has hailed the SC verdict on the Oct 12 change and said that it will provide the present government with an element of legitimacy. Mr Khan said the government should start the implementation of the seven-point agenda. He said it should give priority to the accountability process. It should declare casting of vote mandatory for every voter and undertake other needed electoral reforms to discourage the election of corrupt elements for parliamentary slots. He said the government should also set a limit for election expenditure. In a Press statement issued on Friday, he said after the announcement of the SC verdict the government would no longer be able to give lame excuses to the people who were waiting for positive results. He said the government should have got a vote of public confidence directly through a referendum soon after the takeover. But now the regime should fulfil its promises without any delay and work in accordance with public expectations as it has been provided a period of three years for this purpose by the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Reference: PML accepts SC verdict: Shujaat Reporter 13 May 2000 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/2000/may13.html#pmla 


1 – Five judges elevated to SC Bureau Report [Daily Dawn Feb 2000] - ISLAMABAD, Feb 2: The government elevated five judges to the Supreme Court on Wednesday. According to a notification, the president has appointed Justice Rashid Aziz, Chief Justice, Lahore High Court; Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, Chief Justice Sindh High Court; Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, Chief Justice, Balochistan High Court; Qazi Farooq, former chief justice of Peshawar High Court; and Justice Rana Bhagwan Das, judge, Sindh High Court, judges of the Supreme Court. After the elevation of Justice Rashid Aziz Khan to the SC, Justice Mohammad Allah Nawaz has been appointed Chief Justice of Lahore High Court. Justice Deedar Hussain Shah has been appointed Chief Justice of Sindh High Court and Justice Javed Iqbal Chief Justice of Balochistan High Court. After these appointments, the number of SC judges has risen to 12, leaving five posts vacant. Reference: Five judges elevated to SC Bureau Report http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/2000/05feb00.html#five

Imran Khan Lies on Properties and Assets (Capital Talk Nov 2011)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l_9O0Yit68

After 15 long years, Imran Khan has finally come out of the commentary box, so to speak. He says he is finally ready for a real political innings. And now, what was otherwise an aging non-entity of a party called PTI has received a few botox shots via the dissidents of other parties. Imran Khan, the cricket hero and philanthropist, has become the darling of many TV talk shows as a politician with serious heft. Using this platform, he has been criticising the so-called status quo. In his line of fire have been the usual culprits, the PPP and PML-N. Both, according to him and his followers, have plundered the national wealth. To his followers, he is no less than a messiah in disguise who is ready to relieve Pakistan of its biggest menace: corruption. Khan’s PTI is the cleanest, and he can perform magic where all others have failed. In reality, though, his party seems to be the newly laundered version of the old PML-Q. His sudden rise can be attributed to the successful dharnas (sit-ins) in Peshawar and Karachi. The anti-American Khan is of the view that all the ills of Pakistan are due to the US invasion of neighbouring Afghanistan. His rallies displayed “Say No to Drones” banners, and his fiery speeches criticised the current regime and its allegiance to US policy. It is amazing given that these drones were flying in General Musharraf’s era as well, yet Mr Khan did not resort to any sit-ins or street action at that time. Even after his sit-ins, there were other drone attacks, but apparently sit-ins were more of a passing fad. Typically long-term strategic foreign policy is carried over from government to government, regardless of who is in the saddle. Imran Khan is fairly familiar with the region and knows that the incumbents are continuing the policy of their predecessor. Besides, being an astute political commentator, he is completely aware that, when it comes to foreign policy, the civilian government has to tread a fine line. And I’m sure it is rather obvious to him and the rest of the country who draws that line. By inheriting Khurshid Mahmood Kasuri and Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Khan has done an about-face on his anti-American rants. Needless to say, both these men were the once recent foreign ministers and share some blame for the policies that Khan has highlighted and tried to capitalise on. But like any other member of the opposition, Mr Khan loves to gain political mileage at the expense of the current regime. His mantra of “hope” and “change,” primarily borrowed from Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, seems to be a big ploy of hot air. His Minar-e-Pakistan rally in Lahore, which was touted as a political tsunami and “game changer,” may be nothing more than a hoax. What baffles many observers is the political jugglery of immense proportions. It seems as if Khan’s followers believe he is a Superman and will propel Pakistan forward, full throttle, with some application of his supernatural strength and speed. What they badly fail to realise is, that even if Mr Khan becomes the prime minister, it’s not him but the legislators who can ensure that real change occurs. The fact is, no matter what, in order to reach Islamabad, Imran Khan will have to wheel and deal with other political parties. More recently, he has taken any and everybody into the PTI’s “hall of fame.” He has finally come to terms with the fact that a campaign runs on “electable candidates,” whether those candidates may be feudal landlords or age-old bureaucrats, because in the end, his one-man show cannot garner enough seats to carry him to the finish line. Khan’s leanings towards the religious right are no hidden secret. Typically that segment does not carry much strength when it comes to real change or action of any worth. It turns out to be a hotchpotch of parties who come under the banner of religion and disintegrate rather quickly. In case he has any doubts about this, all he needs to do is revisit the history of the PNA, IJI and MMA. To bank on their support will be quite a futile exercise, even though his supporters are a cross of the ideologically confused pseudo-liberals and fundamentalists of the right. As they say, the devil is in the details. At this point in time, those details are still murky. How does he intend to throw away the so-called begging bowl? What magical macro- and micro-economic policies does he intend to introduce that will boost GDP, reduce unemployment, minimise inflation and increase foreign investment? Above all, how will he be able to eradicate the distasteful icing of corruption from this economic cake? And here is a grim reminder for Khan and his followers: they should be holding their criticism and disdain for some of the other political parties in the current arena. When and if his time comes, he will have to form a coalition with the same old time-tested faces. That’s a ground reality, and ignoring that would be nothing less than stupid. Remember, presumably he is running to be prime minister and not king. It’s going to be more of the same under a different name. Being “Kuptaan” in cricket is easier than playing the real game on the political pitch. REFERENCE: Imran Khan: Stumbling on the Political Pitch By D Asghar 26 DECEMBER 2011 http://www.newslinemagazine.com/2011/12/imran-khan-stumbling-on-the-political-pitch/

Imran Khan Lies on Properties and Assets

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuZ0FdPUYH4


Imran Khan's choice of candidate for prime minister has left many of his ardent fans, especially women, dumbfounded. The cricketer-turned-politician voted for Maulana Fazlur Rehman, the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal's nominee for premier, against the advise of many liberal and progressive members within his Tehrik-e-Insaaf (TI). Imran used his solitary vote in parliament in Rehman's favour, forwarding the argument that the MMA is the only political force that is independent and does not take dictation from abroad. He maintained that he found himself ideologically and politically close to the MMA, which denounces President Pervez Musharraf's support to the international coalition in the war against terrorism, especially in neighbouring Afghanistan. "Khan has more than a soft corner for the ousted Afghan Taliban," a senior leader of his party said on the condition of anonymity. "He thinks that the orthodox religious militia did a great service to Afghanistan and Islam before they became a target of the Americans." Also, the MMA's firm stand against Musharraf, especially his series of controversial constitutional amendments, won the heart of Pakistan's former speedster, he added. Imran's protracted bitterness towards the Pakistan Peoples' Party and anger against the Pakistan Muslim League left him with no alternative other than the MMA, which secured 86 votes, including those of the Pakistan Muslim League (N). Khan's vote for the pro-Taliban cleric has added to the political confusion within his party, which performed poorly in the October 10 elections. "It would have been understandable, had Imran voted for a candidate that was nominated jointly by the opposition," said a senior Tehrik-e-Insaaf leader. "But by voting for the MMA, he most certainly has lost his standing among the liberal, democratic and progressive elements in society." Human rights groups and the majority of the moderate and liberal Muslims have been extremely critical of the MMA's narrow interpretation of Islam and the conservative views of its leaders on women, education, fine arts, television and sports. By voting for the MMA, the Tehrik-e-Insaaf chief has, in effect, endorsed the religious alliance's stand on these issues as well. Will the women's wing of the Tehrik-e-Insaaf, led by Jemima, Khan's British-born wife, endorse the Taliban-like interpretation of Islam? That remains a moot point. Mairaj Mohammed Khan, the Tehrik-e-Insaaf's secretary general who has spent a lifetime advocating socialism and secular politics, finds it hard to defend the somersaults of the party leader, who has drifted from one extreme (of being pro-Musharraf) to the other extreme (of being anti-Musharraf) within a short span of time. REFERENCE: Will the Real Imran Please Stand Up? By Amir Zia 9 DECEMBER 2002 http://www.newslinemagazine.com/2002/12/will-the-real-imran-please-stand-up/

Friday, December 30, 2011

Imran Khan is Inspired by Heretic (Zindeeq) Ibn Arabi.

Imran vows to make Pakistan an Islamic welfare state - If elected, we’ll create an Islamic welfare state Imran pledges to end corruption in 90 days * PTI chief says Pakistan needs a govt that changes system and breaks begging bowl KARACHI: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan, on Sunday, pledged to make Pakistan an Islamic welfare state if his party came to power, and promised a state where justice would be ensured on grass roots level. Addressing a big convention at a ground adjacent to the Mazar-e-Quaid, the PTI chairman told the crowd he was forming a team to formulate policies, notably aimed at alleiviating poverty “We want to break the begging bowl once and for all”, he said, and make Pakistan a “true Islamic welfare state”. He hit out at President Asif Ali Zardari, claiming his days were numbered and accusing him of policies that encouraged corruption. He said his party would solidify judiciary on priority basis, and promised free of cost justice on people’s doorsteps, adding that all the systems in government departments would be computerised to check corruption. Khan said that he would introduce an exemplary team, which would be honest and capable. He said that party ticket would be granted on merit to only those candidates who will declare their assets. Later, if someone’s assets grow, he/she would be asked to make a declaration. That mechanism, he said, would prevent legislators from getting involved in corruption. The PTI chief further said that corruption prevalent in the country would be eliminated within 90 days of his party’s coming to power, and said it was not a tough task for him. He said that in present situation, the country bears a loss of Rs 3000 million every day. He announced that his party would form a free and fair accountability cell, free of political pressure, and vowed to end political interference in police department. REFERENCE: If elected, we’ll create an Islamic welfare state By Asad Farooq Monday, December 26, 2011 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011\12\26\story_26-12-2011_pg1_1 Imran vows to make Pakistan an Islamic welfare state Shamim Bano Monday, December 26, 2011 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=11270&Cat=13

Imran Khan is Inspired by Heretic (Zindeeq) Ibn Arabi.

As per Ms. Madiha R Tahir: By then, Imran had taken a distinctly pious turn. "I met a man who was a spiritual man and had powers like Ibn Arabi, that great 13th Century mystic who saw with double vision. "He paused and corrected himself, then started again. "It wasn't that. It was just the vision of that man. REFERENCE: I’ll Be Your Mirror by Madiha R Tahir http://www.caravanmagazine.in/Story.aspx?Storyid=1229&StoryStyle=FullStory





Lets have a look what is the reality of Ibn Arabi (The Heretic Sufi) in the light of Islamic Teaching & kindly do keep in mind that Imran Khan wants an Islamic Welfare State.

Excerpts from Iman-e-Khalis by Late. Masooduddin Usmani

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist23.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist24.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist25.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist30.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist31.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist32.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist33.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist34.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist35.htm




Noted Saudi Arabian Scholar Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid says http://islamqa.info/en/ref/7691

"QUOTE"


He was a prominent Sufi; in fact he was an extreme Sufi. His name was Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn Muhammad al-Taa’i al-Andalusi. The scholars have told us about him in response to a question which was put to them. The question was as follows:

What do the imaams of the religion and the guides of the Muslims say about a book which has been circulating among the people, the author of which claims that he wrote it and distributed it to people by permission of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) which was given to him in a dream which he claims to have seen? Most of this book contradicts what Allaah revealed in His Books and is opposed to what His Prophets said.

Among the things that he says in this book are: Adam was called insaan because in relation to the truth (Al-Haqq), he was like the pupil [insaan] of the eye, the part that can see.

Elsewhere he said: Al-Haqq which is transcendent is the physical creation which you can see.

Concerning the people of Nooh he said: if they had turned away from their worship of [their idols] Wudd, Siwaa’, Yaghooth and Ya’ooq, they would have lost more of Al-Haqq.

Then he said: Every object of worship is a manifestation of Al-Haqq. Those who know it, know it, and those who do not know it, do not know it. The one who has knowledge knows what he is worshipping and in what image the object of his worship is manifested. These many and varied manifestations are like the limbs of a physical image.

Then he said concerning the people of Hood: They reached a true state of closeness (to Allaah) and were no longer remote. The heat of Hell no longer affected them and they gained the blessing of closeness to Allaah because they deserved it. They were not given this delicious experience as a favour, but because they deserved it as a result of the essence of their deeds, for they were on a straight path.

Then he denied the idea of the warning against those of mankind against whom the word of punishment is justified.

Should the one who believes in what he says be denounced as a kaafir, or should we accept what he says, or what? If the person who listens to him is an adult of sound mind, and does not denounce him by speaking or in his heart, is he a sinner, or what?

Please explain to us clearly and with proof, as Allaah has taken the covenant from the scholars on that basis, for negligence [on the part of the scholars] causes a great deal of confusion to the ignorant. (‘Aqeedah Ibn ‘Arabi wa Hayaatuhu by Taqiy al-Deen al-Faasi, p. 15, 16).

(The author) mentioned the response of some of the scholars:

Al-Qaadi Badr al-Deen ibn Jamaa’ah said:

The passages quoted, and other similar parts of this book, are bid’ah and misguidance, evil and ignorance. The religiously-committed Muslim would not pay any heed to them or bother to read the book to find out more.

Then he said:

The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) could never give permission in a dream for something which goes against and contradicts Islam; on the contrary, this is from the evil insinuations or whispers of the Shaytaan and a trap whereby the Shaytaan is playing with him and tempting him.

His words about Adam, that he is the pupil of the eye, and his likening Allaah to His creation, and his remark that ‘Al-Haqq which is transcendent is the physical creation which you can see’ – if by ‘Al-Haqq’ he is referring to the Lord of the Worlds – is a clear statement of anthropomorphism [likening Allaah to His creation] and he has taken this notion to extremes.

With regard to his denial of what has been narrated in the Qur’aan and Sunnah concerning the warning: this makes him a kaafir in the view of the scholars of the followers of Tawheed.

His comments about the people of Nooh and of Hood is vain and false talk which deserves to be rejected. The best way of dealing with that is to destroy this and all other similar passages of his book, for it is no more than fancy words, an expression of baseless ideas and an attempt to introduce into the religion ideas that do not belong to it. The ruling on this is that it should be rejected and ignored. (Ibid., p. 29, 30).

Khateeb al-Qal’ah Shaykh Shams al-Deen Muhammad ibn Yoosuf al-Jazari al-Shaafa’i said:

Praise be to Allaah. His comment about Adam being called insaan is anthropomorphism [likening Allaah to His creation] and is a lie and falsehood. His belief that the idol-worship of the people of Nooh was valid is kufr. Anyone who says such a thing cannot be approved of. His comment that ‘Al-Haqq which is transcendent is the physical creation which you can see’ is false and contradictory, and it is also kufr. His comment that the people of Hood had reached a true state of closeness (to Allaah) is a lie against Allaah, and by saying this, he has rejected what Allaah said about them. His remark that they were no longer remote and that Hell became a blessing and a joy for them is a lie and a rejection of everything that was revealed to the Prophets; the truth of the matter is what Allaah said about that, that they (the people of Hood) will abide in the torment forever.

Concerning those who believe what he says – and he knows what he said – the same ruling applies to them as to him: that they are misguided kaafirs, if they have knowledge. If they do not have knowledge, then the person who says that out of ignorance should be told the truth and taught about it, and should be stopped if possible.

His denial of the warning to all people is a lie and a rejection of the consensus (ijmaa’) of the Muslims. No doubt Allaah will bring about the punishment. Islam offers definitive evidence that a group of sinners from among the believers will be punished, and the one who denies that is regarded as a kaafir. May Allaah protect us from wrong belief and denying the Resurrection. (Ibid., p. 31, 32).

Ibn Taymiyah said:

The Muslims, Christians and Jews all know something which is a basic principle of the Muslims’ religion: that whoever says of any human being that he is a part of God is a kaafir, he is regarded as a disbeliever by all these religions. Even the Christians do not say this, although their belief is a major form of kufr; no one says that the essence of creation is part of the Creator, or that the Creator is the creation, or that Al-Haqq which is transcendent is the physical creation which you can see.

Similarly, his remark that if the Mushrikeen turn away from idol-worship, they will have turned away from Al-Haqq to the extent that they have abandoned idol-worship, is obviously kufr according to the basic principle that is common to all the religions. For the religions are agreed that all the Prophets forbade idol-worship and regarded as disbelievers those who did that; the believer cannot be a believer unless he disavows himself of worshipping idols and of everything that is worshipped instead of Allaah. As Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning);

“Indeed there has been an excellent example for you in Ibraaheem (Abraham) and those with him, when they said to their people: ‘Verily, we are free from you and whatever you worship besides Allaah, we have rejected you, and there has started between us and you, hostility and hatred for ever until you believe in Allaah Alone’” [al-Mumtahanah 60:4]

-- and he quoted other aayaat as proof -- then he said:

Whoever says that if the idol-worshippers give up their idols, they will have turned away from Al-Haqq to the extent that they have abandoned idol-worship, is an even worse kaafir than the Jews and Christians, and the one who does not regard them as kaafirs is an even worse kaafir than the Jews and Christians, for the Jews and Christians regard idol-worshippers as disbelievers, so how about one who says that the one who gives up idol-worship has turned away from Al-Haqq to the extent that he has abandoned idol-worship?! Let alone the fact that he says, The one who has knowledge knows what he is worshipping and in what image the object of his worship is manifested. These many and varied forms are like the limbs of a physical image and the energy in a spiritual image; nothing but Allaah is being worshipped in everything that is worshipped. He is an even greater kaafir than the worshippers of idols, for they only take them as intercessors and mediators, as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“ [The Mushrikeen say] ‘We worship them only that they may bring us near to Allaah’” [al-Zumar 39:3]

“Have they taken (others) as intercessors besides Allaah? Say: “Even if they have power over nothing whatever and have no intelligence?” [al-Zumar 39:43]

They acknowledged that Allaah is the Creator of the heavens and the earth, and the Creator of the idols, as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And verily, if you ask them: ‘Who created the heavens and the earth?’ Surely, they will say: ‘Allaah (has created them)’” [al-Zumar 39:38] (Ibid., 21-23)

Shaykh al-Islam also said:

When the faqeeh Abu Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Salaam came to Cairo and they asked him about Ibn ‘Arabi, he said:

He is a vile and evil shaykh who says that the world is eternal and does not see anything haraam in any sexual relationship.

He mentioned the belief that the world is eternal because this is what [Ibn ‘Arabi] believed, but this is well-known form of kufr and the faqeeh Abu Muhammad denounced him as a kaafir because of this. At that time Ibn ‘Arabi had not yet said that the universe was God or the universe was the image and essence of God. This is a greater form of kufr because those who say that the universe is eternal still believe that there had to be Someone Who brought it into existence, that from the One Who must exist comes that which may exist. Those shaykhs who met him [Ibn ‘Arabi] said that he was a liar and a fabricator, and that in his books such as al-Futoohaat al-Makkiyyah etc. there were lies which could not be concealed from any intelligent person.

Then he said:

I have not even mentioned one-tenth of what they mentioned about kufr, but people who do not know about them have been deceived by these ideas, just as they were deceived by the Baatini Qaraamitah when they claimed to be descendents of Faatimah and said that they belonged to the Shee’ah, so the Shee’ah began to like them without knowing of their hidden kufr. So the person who is attracted to them is one of two things: either he is a heretic and hypocrite, or he is misguided and ignorant. With regard to these pantheists (ittihaadiyoon), their leaders are the leaders of kufr and must be executed, and their repentance cannot be accepted if they are seized before they repent, for they are among the greatest heretics, those who make an outward display of being Muslim whilst concealing kufr in their hearts, those who conceal their beliefs and their opposition to Islam. Everyone who follows them, who defends them, who praises them, who admires their books, who is known to help them, who does not like to speak against them or who makes excuses for them by saying that we do not know exactly what these statements mean, who says ‘How can we be sure that he wrote this book?’ and other excuses which no one but an ignorant person or a hypocrite would come up with, must be punished.

Indeed, it is obligatory to punish everyone who knows about them but does not help to resist them, because campaigning against these people is one of the most serious duties, for they have corrupted the minds and religious belief of many shaykhs, scholars, kings and princes, and they are spreading corruption throughout the world, preventing people from following the path of Allaah. The harm that they cause to the religion is greater than that done by those who damage the worldly interests of the Muslims but leave their religion alone, such as bandits on the highways and the Tatars (Mongols) who took their wealth but left their religion alone. Those who do not know them should not underestimate the danger they pose. Their own misguidance and the extent to which they misguide others defies description.

Then he said:

Whoever thinks well of them and claims not to know how they really are should be informed about them. If he does not then turn his back on them and denounce them, then he should be classed as one of them. Whoever says that their words could be interpreted in such a way that it does not contradict sharee’ah is one of their leaders and imaams. If he is intelligent, he should know what they really are. But if he believes in it and behaves like this openly and in secret, then he is a worse kaafir than the Christians. (Ibid., p. 25-28 – adapted and abbreviated)

Ibn Hajar said:

Some confusing words of Ibn ‘Arabi were mentioned to our master Shaykh al-Islam Siraaj al-Deen al-Balqeeni, and he was asked about Ibn ‘Arabi. Our Shaykh al-Balqeeni said: he is a kaafir. (Ibid., p. 39).

Ibn Khaldoon said:

Among these Sufis are: Ibn ‘Arabi, Ibn Saba’een, Ibn Barrajaan and their followers who follow their path and their religion. They have many books in circulation that are filled with blatant kufr and repugnant bid’ahs, trying to interpret clear texts in very far-fetched and repugnant ways, such that the reader is astounded that anyone could attribute such things to Islam. (Ibid., p. 41).

Al-Subki said:

These later Sufis, such as Ibn ‘Arabi and his followers, are misguided and ignorant and beyond the pale of Islam; those among them who have knowledge are even worse. (Ibid., p. 55).

Abu Zar’ah ibn al-Haafiz al-‘Iraaqi said:

Undoubtedly the famous book Al-Fusoos contains blatant kufr, as does al-Futoohaat al-Makkiyyah. If it is true that he wrote this and continued to believe in it until he died, then he is a kaafir who is doomed to eternity in Hell, no doubt about it. (Ibid., p. 60).

So how can any sane person say that these brilliant scholars did not understand Ibn ‘Arabi? If they did not understand him, who can?

An incident from which we learn a lesson:

Al-Faasi said:

I heard our companion al-Haafiz al-Hujjah al-Qaadi Shihaab al-Deen Ahmad ibn ‘Ali ibn Hajar al-Shaafa’i say: there were many disputes about Ibn ‘Arabi between me and one of those who like Ibn ‘Arabi, until I insulted him because of the bad things that he had said, but that did not make the man change his mind. He threatened to complain about me to the Sultaan in Egypt with regard to a matter that was different from that which we were arguing about, just to cause trouble for me. I said to him: the Sultaan has nothing to do with this! Come, let us make Mubaahalah [call our sons, our wives and ourselves and pray and invoke the Curse of Allaah upon those who lie – cf. Aal ‘Imraan 3:61]. It is very rare, when people make Mubaahalah and one of them is lying, for that one to go unpunished. So he said to me, ‘Bismillaah’ [i.e, he agreed]. And I said to him: ‘Say: O Allaah, if Ibn ‘Arabi is misguided, then curse me with Your Curse’ – so he said that. Then I said, O Allaah, if Ibn ‘Arabi is rightly-guided, then curse me with Your Curse. Then we parted. Then we met in a park in Egypt on a moonlit night, and he said to us, Something soft touched my leg, look! So we looked but we did not see anything. Then he checked his eyes and he could not see anything (i.e., Allaah had afflicted him with blindness). This is the meaning of what Al-Haafiz Shihaab al-Deen ibn Hajar al-‘Asqallaani told me. (Ibid., p. 75, 76).

This is how this man has misguided and deceived those who are seeking the truth and who want to follow the path of right guidance. He is a heretic who was not ahead of his time in any way except in misguidance and kufr. He does not possess any light or wisdom; on the contrary he is in the depths of darkness and ignorance. We have quoted to you the words of scholars other than Ibn Taymiyah, to point out the kufr of Ibn ‘Arabi, so that you will not think that Ibn Taymiyah was the only one who denounced him as a kaafir.

In response to your bad manners towards Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah and your claim that he came years after Ibn ‘Arabi, we say: you came many more years after Ibn Taymiyah than the number of years between him and Ibn ‘Arabi, so you of all people should keep quiet about him. It is not right to speak in such an ill-mannered way about a Shaykh such as Ibn Taymiyah, whose knowledge has spread all over the world. How can a man such as you dare to describe him as an ant? Who are you to describe the Shaykh of shaykhs and the Shaykh of Islam as an ant? Do you not fear that you will have to stand before Allaah and be questioned as to why you were so ill-mannered towards the scholars? We ask you by Allaah, besides Whom there is no other god, can a person who says that the creation is a part of the Creator be a Muslim? Based on your response, you will know the state of your Islam. And Allaah is the Guide to the Straight Path.

"UNQUOTE"

Imran Khan's PTI is General Pervez Musharraf League (Capital Talk - 21 Dec 2011)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6AsUhe23zI


Marxism even in its heyday never had so many prophets of change as Pakistan. We can’t fix ordinary things and most of our bonzes, including Kublai Khan, have a hard time grappling with ordinary concepts but they must talk the language not just of change but of revolution. Whether they are fooling many people on the skyline may be a matter of conjecture. But they sure are fooling themselves. Out in the vanguard of the revolution waiting-to-happen is Kublai himself, his Bolshevik central committee consisting of such committed ideologues as Qureshi, Kasuri, Assef Ahmed Ali, Jehangir Tareen, et al, with those sinister ex-Jamaatias at the back who have been his ideological bodyguards...a list enough to give anyone a headache. The time may have come to rend the veil asunder. The Karl Marx of the Khan revolution is Professor Rafiq Akhtar of Gujar Khan. And I suppose its Engels is our friend Haroon Rashid, the perspicacious wordsmith. I want to make the pilgrimage to Professor Akhtar’s Marxian shrine myself. Out of curiosity and then because Professor Akhtar is said to be a generous host, partial to game – partridge and quail and desi mugh (no broilers, please) and, lastly, because another of his acolytes is one Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani. The Bolsheviks, God save their memory, had their priorities right. When the Winter Palace in St Petersburg was stormed soldiers and sailors broke into the Tsar’s cellars, and the drains ran with some of the finest wine in Europe. And soldiers lay drunk in the gutters. Wine was not the emblem of the revolution but it was a solace. What is going to be the solace of the Kublai revolution? Given what is fairly widely known of the early preference of many of its leading lights – I will not be more specific – could it be pot? If that is the case, is there a glimmer of hope? For could not pot – charas in the vernacular – lead to a light loosening of the strings of Prohibition? Or will there be a continued run on hypocrisy? On the subject of hypocrisy, must the standard-bearers of revolution make a spectacle of their prayers on stage? Whom are they trying to impress? Such a public effusion may leave even sinners like me with wet eyes but if it becomes standard practice it is likely to become a bit wearisome...too much of a good thing. A word also about the soulful music at the Kublai rallies, especially when the theme gets tragic and Imran speaks of all that has gone wrong with the Islamic Republic. The choreographers went soulful even in Chakwal and the results were hilarious. If there is to be music there are so many stirring marches to choose from – Mozart (Turkish march), Beethoven (his military music is fantastic), Schubert, etc. But I suppose this is a tall order. If Imran were the only drumbeater around, the only apostle of change, it would still be bearable. But Pakistan is suffering from a surfeit of Lenins, Pakistani politicians somehow convinced that unless they intone the word inquilab they are not coming up to the mark. Thus the ensuing catastrophe of even the Sharif brothers playing the same symphony, Nawaz Sharif unable to deliver a speech without mentioning revolution and Punjab’s Khadim-e-Aala leaving audiences spellbound with his rendition of Jalib’s “mein nahin manta, mein nahin janta”. Nawaz Sharif has a keen sense of humour and laughs easily. Does the irony escape him that coming from him, one of Pakistan’s leading plutocrats, talk of revolution sounds a bit thick? But I suppose it doesn’t pay to be over-sensitive in Pakistani politics. At this point, unless I sound too jarring, may I put in a word for the mayhem let loose on ‘Pindi Board first year students by the computer revolution set in motion by the Khadim-e-Aala? They have been denied what in the jargon is called ‘objective marks’ which will make them suffer when they seek admission in such places as NUST and FAST and so on. Let the Khadim-e-Aala be grateful that the media have other eggs to fry. Otherwise, the ineptitude on display on the part of Punjab’s education mandarins under his command would be a firing squad matter in any other climate. The affected students don’t deserve this. Lest we forget, this is in the land of good governance. A relatively simple matter like getting papers marked correctly turns into a laughing blunder but, let all doubts be set at rest, we will change the destiny of Pakistan. It is a relief to turn from Kublai Khan and other Lenins to the PPP, the relief coming from the lack of hypocrisy in a party not afraid of turning itself into a laughingstock. President Zardari and the PPP are what they are without guise or makeup, warts and all unconcealed, with mercifully no talk of revolution and little pretence at being what they are not. In telephone conversations the president tries to sound like a global statesman but that is not hypocrisy. Perhaps he really thinks that he operates at that level. The other parties and their leaders are too stuffy and self-righteous, including Kublai. The eleventh commandment could well be “Thou shalt not be self-righteous”...although one would have a hard time enforcing it in the broad spaces of the Islamic Republic. The twelfth commandment could be “Thou shalt not be boring”. Rehbar-e-Tehrik Altaf Hussain is not boring, never is. It is always a spectacle watching him deliver his long-distance orations, and a treat watching the looks of patient suffering on the faces of his captive audiences. When he is funny he can be impish, his take on the Khadim-e-Aala’s Jalib singing an example of this. He has also been known to talk of revolution but he doesn’t labour the point, as Nawaz Sharif does, in season and out. I suppose as a natural comic Altaf Hussain is not self-righteous, currently the foremost Pakistani disease. The firebrands of the Pakistan Defence Council recently held a most impressive show at Minto Park. (Where do these guys get their funding from?) Dubbed by uncharitable critics as Gen Pasha’s own hussars – ah, when will we be rid of conspiracy theories? – I have a great deal of empathy for this outfit, especially some of its firebrands who are more engaging company than many of the worthies in Pakistani politics out to save the nation, and who make your eyes glaze as they hold forth. I have friends amongst the Council such as the Islamic scholar, Allama Tahir Ashrafi, a portly divine with a sharp sense of humour and hence also a man of the world. And I look with great respect, and no little inward amusement, at that staunch pillar of the faith, the reverend Maulana Samiul Haq, spiritual godfather, Allah be praised, of the Taliban movement. But some of my empathy also flows from the rumour – alas, only a rumour – that among the other facets of the Pakistan Defence Council there also lurks a potent Vodka Wing. The great Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was not above taking a glass on the sly. This we have from Sardar Khushwant Singh. Far better something like that than wearing one’s religion on stage: it is enough to reaffirm one’s faith in human nature, and the future of Pakistan. Don’t we take ourselves too seriously? Mansoor Ijaz, the great patriot taken to heart by Gen Pasha, has informed us of an S Wing in the ISI’s hallowed confines. If there was a Vodka Wing besides, we would be a less paranoid country. Tailpiece: At last some arguments in the Supreme Court about the meaning and import of Article 184 (3) of the Constitution which leave one’s heart refreshed. Chiefs of the security establishment may yet discover that by conferring the highest patriotic award on the outlandish Mansoor Ijaz, they may have waded into waters more deep than they imagined. Well done, Asma Jahangir. REFERENCE: The many Lenins of Pakistan Ayaz Amir Friday, December 30, 2011 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=84915&Cat=9&dt=12/30/2011


Imran Khan Flase Allegations on MMA & Intelligence Agencies (Jirga - 23 Dec 2011)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgp0Dr9aF1g



* In Musharraf, I saw a reformer; I was wrong * Agencies deprived us of winnable candidates * The economy has sunk and poverty increased * I was offered a top job * We are now organising our party * This is a fight between the establishment and democratic forces * Candidates withdraw when they see that the establishment is against you Imran Khan, chief of his Tehreek-e-Insaaf, is a maverick politician. He won his seat from Mianwali with a thumping majority, is adored by Pakistanis for his contribution to cricket and social welfare. And yet, his party refuses to take off and most people consider him a political novice who doesn’t know how to chalk out the right political course. He is also seen as wavering between his past liberalism and today’s almost rightwing conservative ideas. His party has been going from bad to worse; recently, one of his stalwarts left the party accusing Imran of running the party autocratically. When General Pervez Musharraf took over in October 1999, Imran came very close to him but parted ways when he saw Musharraf indulging in political wheeling-dealing. Today, Imran stands in the opposition. Daily Times’ Karachi Resident Editor Sarfaraz Ahmed met him for a tough-talking interview in Karachi. Below are the excerpts:
Daily Times: Let’s begin with the resignation of your party’s secretary general Mairaj Mohammad Khan.

Imran Khan: I feel sad that Mairaj Mohammad Khan who really worked hard for the party has left feeling bitter. It is unfortunate. We wanted to reorganise our party and give him another position. The secretary general is really the key position around which the party revolves; it is the person that organises the entire party. And Mairaj Mohammad Khan is a different type of politician, basically a street politician, who makes great speeches and is good with the workers. So we wanted to give the job of organisation to someone else. But he took it badly and left. But people come and go in parties and this does not affect parties until they stick to their ideology. Look at the mass defection in Pakistan People’s Party, look at PML (N). It doesn’t mean they will be finished in the next elections. They might actually make a comeback. It all depends on whether people perceive what the party stands for.

DT: But Mairaj Mohammad Khan has raised important issues in his resignation letter. He is highly critical of how you have been running the party?

IK: There’s no point in talking about that. That letter was written in anger. Whatever he wrote was in the heat of the moment. He seemed hurt.

DT: But Mairaj is not the only person. Another important office-bearer, Azhar, has also resigned.

IK: Azhar would go wherever Mairaj goes. When Mairaj talked to the press, Azhar was sitting with him.

DT: Have you accepted his resignation?

IK: Well (laughing), if you go to the press then what choice are others left with?

DT: What do you think of the present state of Pakistan’s politics?

IK: We keep saying that Pakistan is at a crossroads. What does that mean? It means whether our institutions will prevail over the establishment. It is a fight between the establishment, wanting to retain its power over the institutions, which it has done more or less so far and the supremacy of parliament. If democrats win this battle and if they manage to have 1973 constitution reinstated in toto, then we will have a situation where perhaps for the first time the establishment will have lost to political and democratic forces.

DT: You were bitterly critical of the PPP and the PML-N. You seem to have moved away from that position towards accommodation. Why?

IK: Sadly, it is absolutely true. I supported Gen [Pervez] Musharraf because I felt and believed that he could deliver, clean up the judicial system, which is the biggest problem, strengthen the Election Commission, have across-the-board accountability, and hold free and fair elections. If he had done that he would have created a niche for himself. I freely admit my mistake. Before the elections I had a choice. Ours was probably the only party that had the choice either to join or go along with the establishment party or actually risk being wiped out as we almost did. We were deprived of four of our winnable candidates by three agencies. The moment people realise that the establishment is against a party they cower. Contesting elections needs big money. Who wants to spend that kind of money in fighting the establishment and losing? So all our eligible candidates disappeared and we were nearly wiped out. The Musharraf government thought I was in for a piece of cake like others [laughs] while I mistakenly thought Musharraf genuinely wanted to reform the system. I wasn’t interested to be part of their sham and they weren’t interested in reforms.

DT: Did Musharraf convey to you through the agencies that you would be the next prime minister?

IK: No. I was never told I would be the prime minister. I was made to understand that I could really get a good post, possibly the top job. Look at the power the Patriots have. I mean look at it in terms of their parliamentary strength and in terms of the share in the government. It is disproportionate. So I guess I would have been one of those if I had played along.

DT: But you were sure you would become the PM?

IK: Not for a minute did I even consider it. All I am saying is that this was in the end when they negotiated with me and asked me to join the National Alliance.

DT: Was that after the referendum?

IK: That’s when they came after the referendum. I wasn’t buying. They told me ‘listen you are missing out’. Later, they said I’d not even win my own seat.

DT: But you did win your seat.

IK: I won my seat only because there was a popular revolution in Mianwali. Even though all the traditional political houses that have fought each other for thirty years combined to defeat me. That was done by the agencies, but the popular will supported me.

DT: But still...

IK: My opponent who was supported by the establishment had secured 30,000 votes in the previous elections. In the October election, the agencies got him 61,000 votes. I guess they [the agencies] thought that was enough. But the common man returned me with record number of votes.

DT: But your party did not fare well elsewhere?

IK: Look at the problem people don’t understand in Pakistan. Everyone knows the PML-N has the vote-bank and ‘Q’ has no vote-bank. PML-N has barely got 13 seats in the Punjab where they have been in power for fifteen years. How does one explain that? Even in Lahore, the PML-N despite its vote could not get all the seats. So it is the question of getting the right candidates. If your candidates are strong, you will be able to pick up your vote-bank. You also need finances. When our confrontation started with the establishment, we were left with no time and couldn’t groom our own candidates. Those who would have thrown in their lot with us realised the establishment was backing ‘Q’ and so they backed off. Some of them were very straightforward and told us they just could not waste their money.

DT: So you are satisfied with the party’s performance?

IK: No, I am not. That’s why we want to reorganise. We are now developing the party to be able to contest and win elections. We will now groom our own candidates. We are not going to be ever in a position where we are at the mercy of attracting other candidates.

DT: Prime Minister Jamali says the democratic process would come to an end if the opposition does not relent on the LFO issue.

IK: The democratic process has hardly begun. How could it come to an end? This is not democracy. The prime minister calls the president his ‘ boss’ while we have a parliamentary system. The real power is with the president, while the responsibility lies with the prime minister. How can the system work? I don’t know what democracy he is talking about. This is like one of the ‘banana republic’ democracies. The only thing going for us is the free press. We have had rigged elections and the only force that has defied the establishment is of course the MMA.

DT: What are your views on LFO?

IK: The issue and the debate mainly revolve round one point, the uniform. I don’t understand how we can call ourselves a democracy if we have an army chief as president; a grade-22 officer sitting on top of the prime minister. This is not a democracy. I feel very strongly that the only compromise can be that the president doffs his uniform and seek election through the assemblies.

DT: What do you see in the near future?

IK: I don’t see the problem getting any easier. I see a system that is unworkable because of a basic anomaly. This system is going to destroy itself sooner or later. The only way out is for Musharraf to become the president sans his uniform.

DT: How is the economy doing?

IK: September 11 has given Pakistan a window of opportunity. Please bear in mind that before Sept 11, this government had devalued the rupee by 20%. Anyway, thanks to that event, the rupee has stabilized; that’s good. We have reserves. But the biggest disservice this government has done to the common man is reducing the deficit by increasing the prices of utilities. If you collect money through indirect taxes and reduce the deficit, you reduce the deficit, but at what cost. That has broken the common man’s back. There is stagflation and the government has cut down on development expenditures. It should be making infrastructural investment. Its actions are only worsening the recession, though we keep hearing that the economy is picking up. So that’s the one point. But the other point is, I can’t see the economy picking up if there is so much political instability. Who is going to invest? Investment is directly related to political stability and good governance. * REFERENCE: HARDtalk: "MMA is the only political force that has defied the establishment..." Sunday, June 15, 2003 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_15-6-2003_pg3_7 

Imran Khan "ACCEPTS" Lotas & Loses Upright Meraj Muhammad Khan - 4 (Dunya TV 27-1-10)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zp96JQYivI8


Way Back in 2003



KARACHI: The leader of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Mairaj Muhammad Khan, has resigned from the office of Secretary-General and as member of Central Executive Committee in protest against the attitude of party chief Imran Khan who, he says, is managing party affairs through his non-political friends. Mairaj announced his resignation at a Press conference on Friday at the Karachi Press Club. He said after working for over five years with Imran Khan, he had come to the conclusion that the party chief and some of his "non-political" colleagues wishing to build and run the party affairs beyond the realm of experience and comprehension of the Secretary-General. He said it was tragedy that Imran failed to build a party that could lead the people in the struggle to change the oppressive system while the great goals and objectives could only be achieved by great struggle and sacrifices through a strong and organised set-up. The PTI leader said that unfortunately those at the helm of affairs did not share a common vision and many of them were devoid of all conviction and commitment and were not interested even in rendering the slightest sacrifice. He said that the Imran and his friends knew that they would lose their monopoly and control over the party if it developed into a real democratic force as then genuine political workers would join the PTI. He alleged that these elements were creating factionalism, disunity, and lack of discipline in the organisation, and didn't refrain from facilitating the entry of dubious characters, and even criminals into the party, so as to render it ineffective. Mairaj said that the party could have trained and created excellent leaders and workers but there was no collective leadership, no political direction, no political activity or struggle, or enforcement of decisions and accountability. The rank and file, therefore, became disillusioned and the party was gradually reduced to a 'fan club'. He said that the party chief nominated his friends as chief organisers and chief campaign managers who were not really interested in building the party image and made no serious preparations for the local bodies polls or general elections. Mairaj pointed out that the basic strategy and efforts of these elements were to seek government support to reach the corridors of power. He pointed out they gave the analysis that as Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif were out in the wilderness, the PTI, was the best choice of the military regime, which would then be forced to send strong "constituency candidates" to contest the elections on behalf of the PTI. He said that the party chief and his friends supported the referendum of Gen Musharraf to achieve this task which had no moral, legal, or political justification, and which lowered the standing in the democratic circles and completely alienated the party from the masses. He said the public meetings in Lahore and Rawalpindi, and the strategy for both the local and general elections also flopped. According to him, the "miracle" they expected did not take place and when it become clear that the government was in fact patronising the PML-Q, Imran strongly rejected the strategy of 'collaboration' and started attacking the Chaudhury's of Gujrat. It was, however, already too late, Mairaj said, adding, "cricket is by chance but politics certainly is not." He said during the last many years the country had been in the grip of severe inflation, unemployment, "honour" killings, ethnic and sectarian violence, and terrorism. He said the 1973 Constitution had been violated by the LFO and the supremacy of parliament itself had been undermined but the party did nothing to protest, demonstrate, and mobilise the masses on these burning issues. He said that the duality, lack of discipline, and disorder had paralysed the party and party was working as a commercial or social welfare organisation. Mairaj advised Imran that a political party could not lead the people if it was being run through personal friends, retired civil and military officials, and professional managers, like a pressure group or an NGO. He said that Imran was the hero of the World Cup for the people but they did, not accept him as a deliverer (Nijaat Dahanda) or the political leader. He pointed out that for the present, there was no elected organ in the party other than the central office-bearers while all other elected provincial organisations had been unnecessarily dissolved which created a leadership crisis. He said the ambiguity and lack of clarity in the policies had created confusion within the party, whether it was an Islamic democratic, social-democratic party or a Left-wing, Right-wing, or Centrist party. Mairaj said that Imran and he jointly finalised the names for the Central Executive Committee last month but Imran subsequently violated and announced that all those invited to the meeting on April 6 in Islamabad, would become members of the CEC, for six months. He said being Secretary-General of the party, he disagreed on this step of the party chief and decided to resign from the CEC and SG posts. REFERENCE: Mairaj resigns from post of PTI secretary-general By our correspondent http://jang.com.pk/thenews/may2003-d...3/metro/k3.htm http://www.paklinks.com/gs/pakistan-affairs/101628-imran-khans-party-leader-resigns.html

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Karl Inderfurth, Imran Khan & Memory Loss (1996 to 2011)



WAY BACK IN 1999: WASHINGTON, Sept 16: The State Department said on Wednesday the US would continue to work with the Nawaz Sharif government as it was its policy to work with "the Government of Pakistan." "Our policy is based on working with the Government of  Pakistan, and we will continue to work with the Sharif government," Spokesman Jamie Rubin told his regular briefing when asked about the demand by opposition leader Imran Khan that the US should not support the present "corrupt" government. The spokesman was asked: "The former (cricket captain) of Pakistan and now a politician, speaking at the CSIS the other day, said that the US and the IMF should not support the corrupt government of Nawaz Sharif, number one. "Number two, Mr.Sharif has cancelled his visit to the UN. He was supposed to meet with the secretary and the president, and I understand, according to Mr.Khan, that because he does not want to sign the CTBT which he promised last year next year he will sign at the UN." Rubin replied: "Well, may be Mr.Khan has developed the role of spokesman for Mr. Sharif and, therefore, if you have any other questions about Mr. Sharif's intentions or desires, you can direct further questions at Mr. Khan. But from our standpoint, we believe that the path we've taken in working with Pakistan on a number of issues, but also imposing restrictions as a result of their nuclear testing, is the right course. Our policy is based on working with the Government of Pakistan, and we will continue to work with the Sharif government." Officials also clarified that Mr.Imran Khan could not see Assistant Secretary Karl Inderfurth because the US official had a sudden engagement and their meeting was called off at the last minute. A senior American official said that Imran Khan did come to the State Department to meet Inderfurth but instead he could see Inderfurth's Deputy Mr. Eastham. Washington to continue working with Nawaz govt DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 18 September 1999 Issue : 05/38 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1999/18sep99.html#wash


EX PTI Leader Meraj Muhammad Khan on Imran Khan General Musharraf Alliance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-baag583dXI

Way Back in 2003



KARACHI: The leader of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Mairaj Muhammad Khan, has resigned from the office of Secretary-General and as member of Central Executive Committee in protest against the attitude of party chief Imran Khan who, he says, is managing party affairs through his non-political friends. Mairaj announced his resignation at a Press conference on Friday at the Karachi Press Club. He said after working for over five years with Imran Khan, he had come to the conclusion that the party chief and some of his "non-political" colleagues wishing to build and run the party affairs beyond the realm of experience and comprehension of the Secretary-General. He said it was tragedy that Imran failed to build a party that could lead the people in the struggle to change the oppressive system while the great goals and objectives could only be achieved by great struggle and sacrifices through a strong and organised set-up. The PTI leader said that unfortunately those at the helm of affairs did not share a common vision and many of them were devoid of all conviction and commitment and were not interested even in rendering the slightest sacrifice. He said that the Imran and his friends knew that they would lose their monopoly and control over the party if it developed into a real democratic force as then genuine political workers would join the PTI. He alleged that these elements were creating factionalism, disunity, and lack of discipline in the organisation, and didn't refrain from facilitating the entry of dubious characters, and even criminals into the party, so as to render it ineffective. Mairaj said that the party could have trained and created excellent leaders and workers but there was no collective leadership, no political direction, no political activity or struggle, or enforcement of decisions and accountability. The rank and file, therefore, became disillusioned and the party was gradually reduced to a 'fan club'. He said that the party chief nominated his friends as chief organisers and chief campaign managers who were not really interested in building the party image and made no serious preparations for the local bodies polls or general elections. Mairaj pointed out that the basic strategy and efforts of these elements were to seek government support to reach the corridors of power. He pointed out they gave the analysis that as Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif were out in the wilderness, the PTI, was the best choice of the military regime, which would then be forced to send strong "constituency candidates" to contest the elections on behalf of the PTI. He said that the party chief and his friends supported the referendum of Gen Musharraf to achieve this task which had no moral, legal, or political justification, and which lowered the standing in the democratic circles and completely alienated the party from the masses. He said the public meetings in Lahore and Rawalpindi, and the strategy for both the local and general elections also flopped. According to him, the "miracle" they expected did not take place and when it become clear that the government was in fact patronising the PML-Q, Imran strongly rejected the strategy of 'collaboration' and started attacking the Chaudhury's of Gujrat. It was, however, already too late, Mairaj said, adding, "cricket is by chance but politics certainly is not." He said during the last many years the country had been in the grip of severe inflation, unemployment, "honour" killings, ethnic and sectarian violence, and terrorism. He said the 1973 Constitution had been violated by the LFO and the supremacy of parliament itself had been undermined but the party did nothing to protest, demonstrate, and mobilise the masses on these burning issues. He said that the duality, lack of discipline, and disorder had paralysed the party and party was working as a commercial or social welfare organisation. Mairaj advised Imran that a political party could not lead the people if it was being run through personal friends, retired civil and military officials, and professional managers, like a pressure group or an NGO. He said that Imran was the hero of the World Cup for the people but they did, not accept him as a deliverer (Nijaat Dahanda) or the political leader. He pointed out that for the present, there was no elected organ in the party other than the central office-bearers while all other elected provincial organisations had been unnecessarily dissolved which created a leadership crisis. He said the ambiguity and lack of clarity in the policies had created confusion within the party, whether it was an Islamic democratic, social-democratic party or a Left-wing, Right-wing, or Centrist party. Mairaj said that Imran and he jointly finalised the names for the Central Executive Committee last month but Imran subsequently violated and announced that all those invited to the meeting on April 6 in Islamabad, would become members of the CEC, for six months. He said being Secretary-General of the party, he disagreed on this step of the party chief and decided to resign from the CEC and SG posts. REFERENCE: Mairaj resigns from post of PTI secretary-general
By our correspondent http://jang.com.pk/thenews/may2003-d...3/metro/k3.htm http://www.paklinks.com/gs/pakistan-affairs/101628-imran-khans-party-leader-resigns.html


LAHORE: The first lesson Mr Imran Khan must be in the process of learning is that if you have pretensions to a career in politics or in the service of the people in any other capacity, your personal life cannot be divorced from your public life. The second lesson he should learn is: Don't preach. Don't fall into the trap of moralising and sermonising. Do whatever you have to do, build a hospital or set up a pressure group, without constructing a Taj Mahar around it. And don't bring religion into everything. Now that it has been confirmed that he is marrying an aristocratic English girl, who will remain English whatever her religion or the clothes she wears, it is inevitable that all the words with which Mr Imran Khan has been flooding newspaper columns in recent months will be recalled to mock him. Those who always thought that there was something a little bogus and hypocritical about his conversion to Pakistaniyat will say: We told you so. In one of his articles, he had said: "All in all, I was smoothly moving to becoming a pukka Brown Sahib. After all I had the right credentials in terms of the right school, acceptability in the English aristocracy, something that our Brown Sahibs would give their lives for. So what led me to do a lota on the Brown Sahib culture and instead become a desi?" What will he say when he is told that he has taken advantage of what he  had decried, namely, acceptability in the English aristocracy, "some Sahibs would give their lives for"? And what kind of a 'lota' has he done in the final analysis? The uncharitable will say that his credentials have worked. Mr Imran Khan should realise that the parameters he had set out for the debate initiated by him as a prelude to entering public life were always naive and simplistic. Pakistan's main problems have nothing to do with the impact of Western culture or civilisation but absolutely every thing to do with our own feudal values which dominate all sectors of life. The symbol of the feudal is not jacket and trouser but shalwar and kameez. He is often uncouth in his behaviour and not very literate: indeed a dose of Western civilisation would do him a world of good. The criminal who terrorises the citizen is not Westernised either, and even the gun he carries is a Russian one imported from the Afghan Mujahideen. The corruption that permeates society is our very own, as is the serfdom and the oppression encountered in the rural areas and at the hands of the police in the cities. The only people for whom wearing Western clothes is actually mandatory and who find it not at all distasteful, are our military men and policemen about which Mr Imran Khan had nothing to say. Marry of Dur political attitudes, not least the lack of tolerance for opposing viewpoints, are coloured by feudalism. If the Iranians crusaded against Western culture, that formed only one strand of a revolutionary upsurge which involved the  overthrowing of deeply entrenched and sinister monarchy. It was not something adopted in isolation, merely for the sake of being different. Dress has lithe to do even wit the sense of national identity, which can come only from a feeling of full participation in the governance of one's country and the knowledge that the life, honour and property of the citizen are being protected by those elected to do so. The sense of nationhood should not in an case be confused with wearing one's patriotism on one's sleeve or being chauvinistic. If M Imran Khan had tried to tackle some of these issues as well the religious bigotry that has enveloped us, instead of railing against the brown sahibs, he might have evoked a more sympathetic chord among those who read him. He allowed himself t be involved in irrelevancies, an now stands in danger of being described as a lost cause. Which is a pity because he has been on of the most charismatic personalities produced by Pakistan. H should have confined himself to quietly building and running his hospital instead of fulmination against politics and politicians, getting himself hooked on the likes of Gen Hameed Gul and telling us ordinary mortals what grovelling creatures we are. But good luck to him in hi marriage. May he have the courage to say 'to hell with you to his critics. That would b more like the Imran Khan who people liked. Matrimony and the moralist From Tahir Mirza DAWN WIRE SERVICE, Section B Week Ending : 18 May, 1995 Issue : 01-19 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1995/18My95B.html#matr

Imran Khan "Hates" & "Loves" Religious Parties (MMA) at the same time.

Imran Khan Flase Allegations on MMA & Intelligence Agencies (Jirga - 23 Dec 2011)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgp0Dr9aF1g



* In Musharraf, I saw a reformer; I was wrong * Agencies deprived us of winnable candidates
* The economy has sunk and poverty increased * I was offered a top job * We are now organising our party * This is a fight between the establishment and democratic forces * Candidates withdraw when they see that the establishment is against you Imran Khan, chief of his Tehreek-e-Insaaf, is a maverick politician. He won his seat from Mianwali with a thumping majority, is adored by Pakistanis for his contribution to cricket and social welfare. And yet, his party refuses to take off and most people consider him a political novice who doesn’t know how to chalk out the right political course. He is also seen as wavering between his past liberalism and today’s almost rightwing conservative ideas. His party has been going from bad to worse; recently, one of his stalwarts left the party accusing Imran of running the party autocratically. When General Pervez Musharraf took over in October 1999, Imran came very close to him but parted ways when he saw Musharraf indulging in political wheeling-dealing. Today, Imran stands in the opposition. Daily Times’ Karachi Resident Editor Sarfaraz Ahmed met him for a tough-talking interview in Karachi. Below are the excerpts:
Daily Times: Let’s begin with the resignation of your party’s secretary general Mairaj Mohammad Khan.

Imran Khan: I feel sad that Mairaj Mohammad Khan who really worked hard for the party has left feeling bitter. It is unfortunate. We wanted to reorganise our party and give him another position. The secretary general is really the key position around which the party revolves; it is the person that organises the entire party. And Mairaj Mohammad Khan is a different type of politician, basically a street politician, who makes great speeches and is good with the workers. So we wanted to give the job of organisation to someone else. But he took it badly and left. But people come and go in parties and this does not affect parties until they stick to their ideology. Look at the mass defection in Pakistan People’s Party, look at PML (N). It doesn’t mean they will be finished in the next elections. They might actually make a comeback. It all depends on whether people perceive what the party stands for.

DT: But Mairaj Mohammad Khan has raised important issues in his resignation letter. He is highly critical of how you have been running the party?

IK: There’s no point in talking about that. That letter was written in anger. Whatever he wrote was in the heat of the moment. He seemed hurt.

DT: But Mairaj is not the only person. Another important office-bearer, Azhar, has also resigned.

IK: Azhar would go wherever Mairaj goes. When Mairaj talked to the press, Azhar was sitting with him.

DT: Have you accepted his resignation?

IK: Well (laughing), if you go to the press then what choice are others left with?

DT: What do you think of the present state of Pakistan’s politics?

IK: We keep saying that Pakistan is at a crossroads. What does that mean? It means whether our institutions will prevail over the establishment. It is a fight between the establishment, wanting to retain its power over the institutions, which it has done more or less so far and the supremacy of parliament. If democrats win this battle and if they manage to have 1973 constitution reinstated in toto, then we will have a situation where perhaps for the first time the establishment will have lost to political and democratic forces.

DT: You were bitterly critical of the PPP and the PML-N. You seem to have moved away from that position towards accommodation. Why?

IK: Sadly, it is absolutely true. I supported Gen [Pervez] Musharraf because I felt and believed that he could deliver, clean up the judicial system, which is the biggest problem, strengthen the Election Commission, have across-the-board accountability, and hold free and fair elections. If he had done that he would have created a niche for himself. I freely admit my mistake. Before the elections I had a choice. Ours was probably the only party that had the choice either to join or go along with the establishment party or actually risk being wiped out as we almost did. We were deprived of four of our winnable candidates by three agencies. The moment people realise that the establishment is against a party they cower. Contesting elections needs big money. Who wants to spend that kind of money in fighting the establishment and losing? So all our eligible candidates disappeared and we were nearly wiped out. The Musharraf government thought I was in for a piece of cake like others [laughs] while I mistakenly thought Musharraf genuinely wanted to reform the system. I wasn’t interested to be part of their sham and they weren’t interested in reforms.

DT: Did Musharraf convey to you through the agencies that you would be the next prime minister?

IK: No. I was never told I would be the prime minister. I was made to understand that I could really get a good post, possibly the top job. Look at the power the Patriots have. I mean look at it in terms of their parliamentary strength and in terms of the share in the government. It is disproportionate. So I guess I would have been one of those if I had played along.

DT: But you were sure you would become the PM?

IK: Not for a minute did I even consider it. All I am saying is that this was in the end when they negotiated with me and asked me to join the National Alliance.

DT: Was that after the referendum?

IK: That’s when they came after the referendum. I wasn’t buying. They told me ‘listen you are missing out’. Later, they said I’d not even win my own seat.

DT: But you did win your seat.

IK: I won my seat only because there was a popular revolution in Mianwali. Even though all the traditional political houses that have fought each other for thirty years combined to defeat me. That was done by the agencies, but the popular will supported me.

DT: But still...

IK: My opponent who was supported by the establishment had secured 30,000 votes in the previous elections. In the October election, the agencies got him 61,000 votes. I guess they [the agencies] thought that was enough. But the common man returned me with record number of votes.

DT: But your party did not fare well elsewhere?

IK: Look at the problem people don’t understand in Pakistan. Everyone knows the PML-N has the vote-bank and ‘Q’ has no vote-bank. PML-N has barely got 13 seats in the Punjab where they have been in power for fifteen years. How does one explain that? Even in Lahore, the PML-N despite its vote could not get all the seats. So it is the question of getting the right candidates. If your candidates are strong, you will be able to pick up your vote-bank. You also need finances. When our confrontation started with the establishment, we were left with no time and couldn’t groom our own candidates. Those who would have thrown in their lot with us realised the establishment was backing ‘Q’ and so they backed off. Some of them were very straightforward and told us they just could not waste their money.

DT: So you are satisfied with the party’s performance?

IK: No, I am not. That’s why we want to reorganise. We are now developing the party to be able to contest and win elections. We will now groom our own candidates. We are not going to be ever in a position where we are at the mercy of attracting other candidates.

DT: Prime Minister Jamali says the democratic process would come to an end if the opposition does not relent on the LFO issue.

IK: The democratic process has hardly begun. How could it come to an end? This is not democracy. The prime minister calls the president his ‘ boss’ while we have a parliamentary system. The real power is with the president, while the responsibility lies with the prime minister. How can the system work? I don’t know what democracy he is talking about. This is like one of the ‘banana republic’ democracies. The only thing going for us is the free press. We have had rigged elections and the only force that has defied the establishment is of course the MMA.

DT: What are your views on LFO?

IK: The issue and the debate mainly revolve round one point, the uniform. I don’t understand how we can call ourselves a democracy if we have an army chief as president; a grade-22 officer sitting on top of the prime minister. This is not a democracy. I feel very strongly that the only compromise can be that the president doffs his uniform and seek election through the assemblies.

DT: What do you see in the near future?

IK: I don’t see the problem getting any easier. I see a system that is unworkable because of a basic anomaly. This system is going to destroy itself sooner or later. The only way out is for Musharraf to become the president sans his uniform.

DT: How is the economy doing?

IK: September 11 has given Pakistan a window of opportunity. Please bear in mind that before Sept 11, this government had devalued the rupee by 20%. Anyway, thanks to that event, the rupee has stabilized; that’s good. We have reserves. But the biggest disservice this government has done to the common man is reducing the deficit by increasing the prices of utilities. If you collect money through indirect taxes and reduce the deficit, you reduce the deficit, but at what cost. That has broken the common man’s back. There is stagflation and the government has cut down on development expenditures. It should be making infrastructural investment. Its actions are only worsening the recession, though we keep hearing that the economy is picking up. So that’s the one point. But the other point is, I can’t see the economy picking up if there is so much political instability. Who is going to invest? Investment is directly related to political stability and good governance. * REFERENCE: HARDtalk: "MMA is the only political force that has defied the establishment..." Sunday, June 15, 2003 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_15-6-2003_pg3_7

Jami Chandio says Imran Khan & PTI have no policy for Sindh (GEO TV 28/12/11)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhTJ6DwjGWg


Imran opposes return of Benazir, Nawaz Staff Correspondent KHAIRPUR, Aug 13: The Chairman, Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf, Imran Khan, has said that the economic conditions of the country are critical and asked what impression the PML and PPP are trying to create by demanding the return of Nawaz Sharif and Ms Benazir Bhutto. He said that the two former rulers took loans and looted the national exchequer worth millions of rupees, and added that how they could be allowed to come back and lead the nation. He said that to the best of his knowledge, the government was not hammering out any deal for the return of Nawaz Sharif and Ms Benazir and such news were creating the wrong impression in the minds of the general public. He supported the reforms saying that the educational and judicial systems should be improved. He observed that in a country where the judicial system was powerful, there would be no political crisis. He suggested a national council consisting of retired judges, lawyers, journalists, intellectuals, and other responsible people for the accountability of the whole system. Mr Imran said that successive elected governments had been providing an opportunity to the army to take over by creating a crisis-like situation in the country where the army was left with no other option. Talking about the elections, he said he was sure that the elections would be held as per schedule and there was no reason for its delay. Defending the reason for supporting the referendum of President Pervez Musharraf, Mr Imran said that there had been a meeting of political parties where all had agreed to support the referendum, but later some of them backed out. Imran opposes return of Benazir,  Nawaz DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending: 17 August 2002 Issue : 08/33 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/2002/aug172002.html#imra

Imran Khan Propaganda Against Pakistani Establishment. (IBN/CNN)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JgwCr5NJJE

Imran Khan Propaganda Against Religious Parties in Indian Media. (IBN/CNN)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvZLNqlzYz4

One of the Alleged beneficiary of Mehran Bank Scandal was Mr. Nawaz Sharif & also Jamat-e-Islami:)


KARACHI, Aug 11: Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chief Imran Khan kicked off his election campaign by announcing three main points of his party's election manifesto - provision of justice, promotion of human values and ensuring self-respect. Addressing a public rally at Nishtar Park he said that he was launching his election campaign from Karachi as the city had always remained a centre of politics and democracy and any movement which began from the metropolis had soon taken the country into its grip. But he lamented that from the last few years this role had been denied to the city, which is a mini- Pakistan. He recalled that in the past, the two main parties which remained in power one after the other had failed to implement their election manifestos because of lack of determination. But, Imran Khan said, for the last 25 years the nation had remained aware of his role as whatever he had promised he had honoured his commitments. Imran Khan said he had derived the three points from Islam and added that the country could not be put to progress unless we are prepared to do justice with its ideology for turning Pakistan into a welfare Islamic state. He said that all our crises were a result of our failure to do justice with our people. He said in our country only the weaker section of society was being made a victim of all repression and oppression while the powerful enjoyed immunity even after plundering the nation's wealth. In this connection, he referred to a report published in Dawn, in which names along with cheque numbers of those who had benefited from Rs500 crores of the Mehran Bank were published. He said these people were again in the field to contest the elections. The case of plundering the wealth has been pending in the court and was not being proceeded because of the influence of those involved in corruption, he maintained. He pledged that his party would never involve in politics of power and would not make alliance with any party whose leader had been involved in corruption. "Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf believes in fair and free elections and will ensure the election to be conducted by a neutral umpire as I was the person who first introduced neutral umpire in the cricket world." He said the government had been trying to reform the system of education in religious institutions but was not paying heed to the English medium institutions, which had been producing Westernized youths devoid of Pakistani spirit. He said no society could progress without giving due status and respect to its teachers, judges and religious scholars. Spelling out the third point of the manifesto, he said the government had been acting on the dictates of the IMF and the World Bank and if Allah gave him an opportunity to serve the people, he would certainly repay their loans but would not take dictation from them. The others who spoke on the occasion including Mairaj Mohammad Khan, Dr Arif Alavi, Zahid Bhurgari, Mir Haider Talpur, Tehmina Khattak, Bismillah Khan, Ashraf Quraishi, Fauzia Khan, Tufail Abbas and Amanullah Paracha. Imran vows to ensure justice and self-respect DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 17 August 2002 Issue : 08/33 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/2002/aug172002.html#imra

Nawaz Sharif & Mehran Bank Scandal (Capital Talk 21 Nov 2011)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x18ak47sG9g



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dr5GO43NNDE


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWokqx_kUNU



KARACHI, Aug 26: Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan has said that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has not only lost the confidence of his erstwhile allies in Sindh, Balochistan and NWFP, but also the confidence of the people of Pakistan. Commenting on the MQM's parting of ways from Sindh government Imran Khan said: "It is not simply the coalition that has fallen apart but it has actually sounded the death-knell of an unjust system of governance, being kept in place by the vested interests in Pakistan. The PTI chief said that the provinces of the federation as well as overseas Pakistanis are also absolutely disillusioned by his capability and performance. "The Nawaz government is finished. The longer, the Raiwind monarchy stays, the greater the damage to the country's integrity. The situation demands immediate corrective and remedial measures to ensure damage control," he added. URBAN Democratic Front Chairman Hussain Haqqani said that had the tension between the MQM and PML been on the basis of issues confronting the people, their reaction would have been different, but as the resignations had been tendered by the organisation, they were neither happy nor sorry. Recalling that despite being part of the government, the unjustified results of the recently held census was conceded, and the population of Karachi had been reduced extremely, the restoration of quota system resolution was adopted in the assembly in the presence of MQM representatives. He said Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif totally ignored the interests of Sindh and Karachi, but at that time they never thought of parting of ways on any of these issues. Pakistan Awami Tehreek Sindh President Prof Dr D.A. Quaderi said it was another push which is crumbling the government. "The days of the government are numbered and the people would be relieved soon from a hypocrite government," he said. He said a government run on the basis of coercion, oppression, lies and hypocrisy could not long last. REFERENCE Leaders see Nawaz govt in doldrums DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 29 August 1998 Issue : 04/34 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1998/29Aug98.html#lead

KARACHI, Aug 27: Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chief Imran Khan on Thursday gave a clarion call to the countrymen to get up and replace the crumbling system which had been there only to protect exploiters, waderas, feudals and plunderers of national wealth. Addressing a public meeting at Lasbela Chowke on Thursday night Imran Khan termed the prevailing set up as the "Mian-BB" system whose sun is now setting. It is not the system of the poor, the workers, the peasants, honest traders and nationalist industrialists, he said. He warned that if this system would be allowed to continue, it would be harmful for the country. The PTI chief paid rich tributes to people of Karachi and recalled past struggles they had waged against the Ayub  dictatorship, undoing of martial law regimes and for the restoration of democracy. He said now the time had come for Karachiites to stand up against the obsolete system. Referring to the excesses which had been faced by people of Karachi, Imran Khan said that the new system was the need of the hour to serve the people without any discrimination, and which would not be aimed at protecting any particular set or group. He said it were the rulers who wanted to pit the people against each other on one pretext or the other, to divert their attention while they looted, but the system which the PTI had planned to implement in the country would look after the interests of the common man, and they would not need to run after the MNAs and MPAs and other influential people. Mr Khan reiterated his stance that devolution of power was the only solution to all the problems being faced by the people and promised to enforce the new system after coming to power. He said the new system would also ensure social justice and promote national integrity. The meeting was also addressed by other PTI leaders including Mairaj Mohammad Khan, Dr Arif Alvi, Najeeb Haroon and others. Sun setting on Mian-BB setup: Imran DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 29 August 1998 Issue : 04/34 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1998/29Aug98.html#suns


KARACHI, July 8: Alleging that rigging had been rampant in the union councils elections in Karachi and Lahore, Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf, Imran Khan, said the government, in a planned way, had ensured the success of the Hamkhiyal group candidates in Lahore. He said that rigging certainly had taken place in Karachi, but not in an organized manner. He alleged that huge amount of money had been spent to bribe the presiding officers. Imran accuses govt of planned rigging in polls DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 14 July 2001 Issue : 07/28 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/2001/jul1401.html#imra


ISLAMABAD, Feb 3: The cricket star turned politician Imran Khan who contested the election for eight national assembly seats, failed to win a single seat, ending any thought that he would emerge as a third political force in the country. Mr Khan who now heads the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf political party, besides running a cancer hospital, was believed to be winning at least his personal seat along with bagging couple of more seats for his partymen. However, he could not be returned to the national assembly as was generally being projected by both political and non-political quarters. Analysts said that he too was the victim of the new wave that ran across the country in favour of Pakistan Muslim League(N) and despite having lot of support from the youth, he did not even secure a single seat for himself. He is on record as having said in a TV interview that he did not care even if he would not secure a single seat, and that he has a long way to go in politics to make his presence felt both in the public and the establishment . Imran out for a duck Ihtashamul Haque DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 06 February 1997 Issue : 03/06 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1997/06Feb97.html#imra


ISLAMABAD Sept 24: Three major political parties have begun mulling a unified strategy to forestal what they fear "chances of organized rigging" on selected seats on the election day. People's Party Parliamentarians Chairman Makhdoom Fahim, Pakistan Muslim League (N) Chairman Raja Zafarul Haq and Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan are expected to meet in the federal capital in the next couple of days to reach a consensus on giving a substantive ultimatum to the establishment to stop meddling in the electoral process or to go for an all-out agitation, informed sources of the three parties confirmed to Dawn. They were also in contact with the Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal leaders and had taken them into confidence in taking a united stand against the expected rigging, the sources said. According to PPP spokesman Farhatullah Babar, all the major parties in the run are extremely perturbed over the reports of a planned rigging on the election day after all pre-poll rigging actions taken. "There are chances of misuse of election material when it is delivered in the evening of October 10," he said, adding that Makhdoom Amin Fahim was arriving here by evening and would start meeting the leaders of other like-minded politicians to plan a strategy. Mr Fahim, who has already held meetings with the leaders of these parties, told a news conference the other day that he was meeting the politicians to achieve the objective of national reconciliation. "It is very tough to fight against the establishment's moves but we are determined to expose every player of the power game before the masses as well as the world opinion leaders," said a political source. PIT Information Secretary Akbar S. Babar indicated that the leaders of the three parties might hold a joint press conference on Sunday. He said Imran Khan was also expected to speak to the press to expose the establishment's activities towards manipulation in shape of pre-poll rigging and rigging on the day of elections. Another suggestion is that these leaders during their meetings may consider chances of the maximum cooperation by making seat adjustments on the most crucial seats, where the top candidates of their parties were contesting.  One of the suggestions is that the PPP withdraw its candidate from the contest against Raja Zafarul Haq in Rawalpindi, as the PML-N has already asked its candidate to withdraw from contest against Makhdoom Amin Fahim. Similarly, they are also likely to discuss the possibility of withdrawing their candidates for the seats for which pro-government heavy weights are contesting. Their main target is said to be PML-QA President Mian Azhar, who is contesting for two National Assembly seats. The biggest hurdle in the way of getting all these leaders together is that all of them are pretty busy in their own electoral campaign in the four provinces. Makhdoom is contesting polls in Sindh, Imran in Mianwali, Swat and Lahore and Raja Zafarul Haq is fighting the battle of his lifetime in Rawalpindi. Parties mull strategy to check 'organized rigging' By Ahmed Hassan DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 28 September 2002 Issue : 08/39 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/2002/sep282002.html#part


LAHORE, Sept 6: Political developments have fast moved towards a 'grand' alliance and formal  announcement of major parties joining hands for a joint struggle to oust the PML. To begin with the alliance will have in its folds the 14-party Pakistan Awami Ittehad of which the People's Party is the largest organization, the Awami National Party, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, the Pakistan Awami Tehrik of Allama Tahirul Qadri and the Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf headed by cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan. Talks with other political parties like are also said to have been progressing and leaders here hope "a positive outcome". The alliance has determined seeking the dismissal of the Nawaz Sharif government as its "top priority" and sources close to it say that this is the avowed objective. However, the alliance is said to have worked out a future agenda which has "a genuine" provincial autonomy and devolution of power on top. The PAI leadership has not invited the Jamaat-i-Islami and the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam of Maulana Fazlur Rehman to join the alliance for different reasons. Grand alliance in offing DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 11 September 1999 Issue : 05/37 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1999/11sep99.html#gran


MULTAN, Sept 29: Leaders of the Grand Democratic Alliance (GDA) on Wednesday said that Nawaz Sharif should step down immediately as he had committed the offence of high treason by taking extra-constitutional measures, damaging the institutions of Judiciary and armed forces and because of his failure on all fronts. They said that if Nawaz did not resign, people would oust him. The demand was made at the end of a three-hour rally which started from Nawan Shehr Chowk and terminated at Daulat-Gate Chowk after passing through Abdali Road, Pul-Shawala, Bohar-Gate, Shaheen- Market, Haram-Gate, Pak-Gate, Khuni-Burj and Delhi-Gate. The rally was led by Nawabzada Nasrullah Khan (PDP), Imran Khan (PTI), Allama Tahir-ul-Qadri (PAT), Rao Sikandar Iqbal (PPP), Asfand Yar Wali (ANP), Mairaj Muhammad Khan (QMA), Khurshid Shah, Makhdoom Amin Faheem, Syed Yousaf Raza Gilani (PPP) and Hamid Nasir Chattha (PML). The gathering was dominated by PDP and Awami Tehreek activists. The PPP and Tehrik-i-Insaf supporters were also in large number. Allama Tahir-ul-Qadri said the statement of the State Department regarding the role of armed forces in Pakistan was an interference in the country's internal affairs and an attack on the sovereignty, independence, prestige and security of Pakistan. He alleged that the Nawaz government was using police and law-enforcement agencies against the opposition. He said the electronic media was also being misused by the rulers for personal coverage. He said the higher courts should take notice of extra-constitutional steps of the PML government, particularly in Sindh, usurping of human rights, gagging the Press and negating the rights of expression. He said the government did not appoint the judges of the Supreme Court in the light of judgment of March 20, 1996. He further said that about 30,000 people were recruited on contract basis on the recommendations of MPAs and MNAs which was a violation of the Civil Services Act, 1976. Allama Tahir-ul-Qadri said that Punjab chief minister had ended the authority of the centre by inviting foreign investors directly to the Punjab. Tehrik-i-Insaf Chief Imran Khan said that the days of the present rulers were numbered. Now even the United States cannot save Nawaz, he said. He said that Nawaz Sharif was ready to accept the Indian hegemony in South Asia by signing the CTBT unilaterally. He said that corruption had increased while Nawaz wanted to sell out Pakistan like a sick unit and a sense of deprivation was developing among the smaller provinces. He ruled out the possibility of an in-house change. Nawabzada Nasrullah Khan enumerated the objective of the rally and said the massive turnout, inspite of scorching heat in Multan, had established that people did not want to see the PML government in power any more. GDA leaders ask Nawaz to step down immediately DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 02 October 1999 Issue : 05/40 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1999/02oct99.html


LONDON, Nov 17: Pakistan s cricketing legend Imran Khan said Sunday he had a great chance of becoming the country s next prime minister after announcing last week he would contest his country s general election. Khan said in an interview on BBC-television his Movement for Justice party would seek to rid Pakistan of corruption. Khan, whose party was founded six months ago, said: I believe we have a great chance - the reason being that the entire country wants a change. They ve seen these politicians over and over again coming to promise the Earth. When the time comes for election, they use any sort of slogan whether it is Islam, socialism, all sorts of slogans have been used and people have realised that their only ideology is self-interest. I think now we present an alternative of Pakistan people who are clean, who are professionals who are not professional politicians, but professionals who excelled in their own professions, Khan told the BBC. I think that s a better alternative in Pakistan - for the first time the people will have a choice. Khan said accountability should be conducted by the Supreme Court rather than parliamentary committees which protect each other. Corruption in Pakistan has reached a stage where everything is unworkable now, he said. It s impossible to conduct any business activity. Any investment coming in is stopped because of this enormous corruption. He added: Both parties are corrupt - so if one party is exposed or a member of one party is exposed, chances are that the others will be exposed too. AFP Our ISLAMABAD bureau adds: Tehreek-e-Insaf led by former cricket star Imran Khan has strongly condemn an attack by PPP workers on the party office in Karachi on Saturday. Such undemocratic behaviour is indeed reflective of the party leadership s undemocratic ethos, central information secretary of Tehreek Nasim Zahara told a press conference on Friday. She alleged that the Tehreek workers were being threatened and intimidated in Sindh. She ask the election commission of Pakistan to take note of these excesses and ensure protection of the life and property of all men and women involved in politics. Tehreek-e-Insaf believes that at a time when ethnic, sectarian and political violence is on the rise, it is foremost duty of political leaders to encourage tolerance in society, she added. Imran says he has great chance of becoming PM DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 21 November 1996 Issue : 02/47 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1996/21Nv96.html#imra


LONDON, May 25: After a week s stay in the UK, Imran Khan is returning to Pakistan on Sunday to resume the work of his party, the Tehreek-e-Insaf. He introduced the movement for reform, that he has initiated, to Pakistanis resident in the United Kingdom at a public gathering in London, when he explained his ten-point programme with a view to launching a political party after completing preparatory work. The Tehreek-e-Insaf founder was interviewed for British television. Last night in an interview with Sky television he was asked if he wanted to be prime minister of Pakistan. He replied: political power is the only way to bring about reform, so yes . Imran says he wants to be PM Athar Ali DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 30 May 1996 Issue : 02/22 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1996/30My96.html#imra


ISLAMABAD, Jan 1: Imran Khan, chief of the Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf, said here on Wednesday that his party would not boycott the forthcoming general election. Addressing a press conference at the outset of his election campaign in the federal capital from where he is contesting election, the PTI chief said his party would not boycott the poll under any circumstances, and added: Our party is against the postponement of elections. He, however, added that the Jamaat-i-Islami, which had boycotted the elections, had a valid point. Four governments in the past had been dismissed on the charge of corruption and it was wrong to go for fresh elections under the same system in which the same people again managed to come into the assemblies, PTI chief pointed out. Mr Khan also released a document called Mian Nawaz Sharif s plot plundering record . He claimed that, as chief minister, Punjab, Mr Sharif had caused a loss of Rs 5 billion to the Punjab treasury. He alleged that Mr Sharif had allotted plots worth Rs 5 billion as a political patronage, in violation of the law. According to Imran Khan s findings, Mr Sharif, as chief minister, Punjab, had allotted: 1,111 plots in various development schemes of LDA; 2,027 plots of Housing and Physical Planning Department of Punjab; about 147 plots, worth 150 million, to MNAs/MPAs, political leaders and other influential people; eight tracts of valuable land with costly timber trees in Murree; 27 mostly commercial and some community plots for residential purpose; 66 one-kanal plots against only 20 that were available for allotment in M.A. Jauhar Town scheme; and 45 one-kanal plots against 27 available in the Sabzazar Housing Scheme. Imran blames Nawaz for Rs5bn plot scandal DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 02 January 1997 Issue : 03/01 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1997/02Jan97.html#imra


ISLAMABAD, Oct 25: The government on Monday constituted the, much awaited, National Security Council( NSC) naming Sharifuddin Pirzada, Dr Mohammad Yaqub, Dr Attiya Inayatullah and Imtiaz
Sahibzada as its members. A three-member cabinet of ministers has also been announced comprising Abdus Sattar, Shaukat Aziz and Aziz A. Munshi. Sharifuddin Pirzada, who has served almost all the past military governments in Pakistan since Ayub Khan, has been named senior adviser to the chief executive and ex-officio member of the NSC. Dr Mohammad Yaqub is the second member of the council. During his tenure as the Governor of State Bank, spread over two terms of Nawaz Sharif and one of Benazir Bhutto, the rupee had tumbled by over 100 per cent, the budgetary deficits kept soaring sky high and the foreign currency accounts were frozen. He was brought to the SBP from IMF by the first Nawaz government. Dr Attiya Inayatullah, the third member of the NSC, besides being associated with the UN activities at very senior levels, has also served the military government of Gen Zia as a minister for social welfare and population control. Imtiaz Sahibzada, the fourth member of the NSC, is currently employed as the member of Federal Public Service Commission with one year's extension. He had retired as cabinet secretary in 1996-97. Former foreign secretary Abdus Sattar, who had served Moin Qureshi's caretaker government in 1993 as its foreign minister, has been given the same portfolio in the new cabinet. Mr Sattar had recently joined Imran Khan's Tehrik-i-Insaf and is believed to be a member of TI's central executive committee. He, therefore, is the first member of a political party to be recruited by the new military government. Mr Sattar is also known for drafting the Simla Agreement which was signed by Pakistan and India on Kashmir during Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's tenure. Vice-president of Citibank, New York, Shaukat Aziz, has been given the portfolio of finance. He is expected to proceed on leave from his bank job to take up the new assignment in Pakistan. He is arriving here on Thursday from New York. Mr Aziz had also been informally giving advise on financial matters to the previous government of Nawaz Sharif. Aziz A. Munshi, who has been appointed as the attorney general of Pakistan, is a leading constitutional expert. Twice earlier, Munshi was appointed attorney general. Firstly during Zia-ul-Haq's tenure and later by the Nawaz Sharif's first government. He has served as a junior partner of Sharifuddin Pirzada in his law company for many years. According to an ISPR press release on the recommendations of Chief Executive Gen Pervez Musharraf, President Mohammad Rafiq Tarar on Monday appointed the members of the National Security Council (NSC) and ministers for finance and foreign affairs. In his October 17 address Gen Pervez Musharraf had announced that the NSC, to be headed by the chief executive, will comprise six members. These members will be chief of naval staff, chief of air staff, a specialist each in legal, finance, foreign policy and national affairs. Sharifuddin Pirzada, the ex-officio member, has apparently been appointed for his expertise in legal and constitutional matters. Pirzada got prominence during the first military rule of Gen Ayub Khan when he was appointed as foreign minister after the sacking of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Pirzada had also served as attorney general as well as law minister of Pakistan during the military rule of Gen Zia. Pirzada had also served as secretary general of the OIC (Organisation of Islamic Conference). Four members of NSC, three ministers named M. Ziauddin DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 30 October 1999 Issue : 05/44 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1999/30oct99.html#four


LAHORE, May 5: Imran Khan, cricketer-turned social worker who is now trying to enter politics, on Sunday held government agencies responsible for the April 14 bomb blast at his cancer hospital and appealed to the chief justice of Pakistan to investigate the matter. At a news conference at the newly opened Scotch Corner office of his Tehrik-i-Insaaf, he maintained that since the government itself was involved in the blast it could not conduct an inquiry into the incident. Imran Khan released to the Press copies of the letter he has sent to the chief justice bringing to his notice the alleged violation of his fundamental rights and appealing to him to look into the issue. After the March 20 judgement on appointment of judges to superior courts, the Supreme Court was the only institution which could be expected to safeguard his rights, Imran Khan said. This is the first time that he has directly blamed the government for the blast in his hospital, although he had previously made insinuation to this effect. Imran alleged that intelligence agencies were tapping his telephones and one agency had even told him the exact conversation he had with a friend. The agencies, he added, kept him under surveillance when he was in Islamabad. He said these agencies were not meant to keep governments in power or to keep track of people not liked by the rulers. He suggested that there should be only one intelligence agency in the country. In his words, when Ms Bhutto was on friendly terms with him during martial law days, she was dead opposed to the intelligence agencies chasing her all the time. Imran holds agencies responsible for blast DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 09 May 1996 Issue : 02/19 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1996/09My96.html#imra


AT this stage of his political career, when he has just got off to an uncertain start, it is all too easy for Imran Khan to attract the cynicism of the drawing room classes. Quite apart from the fact that the staple commodity in which these classes deal is cynicism, Imran Khan has added grist to their mills by exposing himself to the charge of contradiction: saying things which sit uncomfortably with what he himself was practising (and practising with some panache) in the past. This may be an Islamic country but its common people have always been suspicious of preachers, which is why the so-called Islamic parties have always fared so badly at the polls. Last year when Imran Khan took to column-writing (an exercise he has mercifully forsaken) he sounded with his born-again Islam very much like a preacher. This grated on the public consciousness all the more when it was remembered that in London and elsewhere Imran Khan had won as much renown for his cricketing exploits as for his success how gently can I put this? as a playboy. Someone who is inordinately successful with the other sex leaves his fellow-men envious. To entertain feelings of envy for a famous Lothario is bad enough. But then to see the same person in the guise of a born-again evangelist is to test one s patience beyond the limits of human endurance. Imran Khan s Brown Sahib philosophy also made him vulnerable to the jibes of the drawing room classes. Here was as eminent a Brown Sahib as one could think of Atchison, Oxford and all the other right stops inveighing against something of which he was very much a part. Furthermore, some of his thoughts on the drawbacks of representative democracy, the virtues of a jirga system and the loss of national self-esteem as a result of our colonial experience gave the impression of naivete: of someone who was guilty of over-simplification. But one lives and learns. If people were to be judged only by what they had done or said once upon a time, few of us would ever Be saved. There was a time when I genuinely and sincerely considered the Daughter of the East as the answer to Pakistan s problems. If that were to be thrown in my face all the time, what hope would there be for me? Like other mortals Imran Khan too has gained from his experiences. It is no small cause for mercy that he has got over his preaching phase. He also seems to have learnt to be more discriminating about the company he keeps. I have a lot of respect for General Hamid Gul but having heard him expound his fanciful theories on a number of occasions I am convinced that no political enterprise in which he is involved can ever prosper. But all this should be behind Imran Khan. There is nothing more pointless than to live up to the prejudices of Pakistan s chattering classes who trade in cynicism and whose members hate nothing more than to see one of their own strike out on new paths of discovery. The Pakistani privilegentsia never forgave Zulfikar Ali Bhutto for speaking in an idiom (which is all he did) whose harsh sounds it did not like. The chattering classes are unlikely ever to forget Imran Khan s contradictions. This would matter if these classes were politically important. But for the kind of politics that Imran Khan is trying to practise they are totally irrelevant. Their support or opposition will not have any effect, one way or the other, upon the attitudes of ordinary people because the people have yet to discover anything about the chattering classes. Unless Imran has a masochistic streak in him he should keep the revivalist streak in him and his Brown Sahib philosophy under a close check because when he talks of these things, which are of absolutely no concern to the masses, he is merely giving the chattering classes a stick with which to beat him. Far better for Imran Khan to stress the other, more substantive part of his programme: the determination to strike at the roots of corruption; the need to eradicate the VIP culture which is stifling the nation and playing no small part in eating up its resources; and the need to give a more just and fair deal to the people. Whether Imran Khan is the person who can bring about these changes or infuse the Pakistani people with a fresh spirit or hope is something which can be open to debate. After all, there has been no shortage of do-gooders in Pakistan who have promised great things and then done their bit to add to the nation s problems. But about one thing there should be no dispute: at the present time Imran Khan with his Tehrik-i-Insaf is the only person on the national scene who is talking of issues of burning public concern and who, moreover, is doing so in a manner which can be expected to draw a public response. Imran Khan today stands for a movement whose aim is to eradicate corruption and give justice to the Pakistani people (by which presumably is meant the reform of the police and the criminal justice system because in the practical world, as opposed to the world of political rallies, it is only practical steps such as these that lead to practical results). This may sound like a woolly agenda but at least it is an agenda and it is something that the people can identify themselves with. Can anyone say what Benazir Bhutto stands for? If there is an election tomorrow what exactly will she fight it on? It is all very well to say that she is macro-managing the economy. But we have seen the fruits of macro-economic management harvested by the Congress-I in India. People are not impressed by hollow slogans which have little bearing on their real lives. Macro- management indeed when rampant inflation and an excessively high unemployment rate are giving an edge to public discontent.  Contrast this with high-level corruption and the spendthrift and ostentatious ways of the governing classes, and we have a situation which is crying out for some kind of deliverance. If Benazir stands for nothing but more of the same, what does Mian Nawaz Sharif and the PML-N stand for? It is true that Nawaz Sharif by his defiance of Ghulam Ishaq Khan, and subsequently by dint of sheer energy, has built a popular constituency for himself and given the Muslim League (for the first time since 1947-49) a mass political base. But can anyone answer with any certainty as to what Mian Nawaz Sharif will do, what are the reforms he will carry out, if he again comes to power? Will Pakistan be cleaned of corruption? Will a new political morality hold sway over the country? Will nepotism come to an end and will jobs be given only on the basis of merit? Will the country s political masters realise that there is something called a conflict of interests whereby it is not considered seemly for public officials to use their official positions to further their private advantage? Ask any Muslim League stalwart as to what his party is doing or will do in the future and he will say we are trying to save the country. Edifying as this answer may be, it is not very helpful in trying to figure out the nuts and bolts of the Muslim League's programme. In any case, it is a refrain heard loudly during the last few years that there is nothing fundamental which distinguishes the PPP and the Muslim League. They are chips off the same block: mouthing the same slogans and being represented by people whose class and political background is the same. If tomorrow there is a change of government, a different set of people will come to power. But in what other respects will the situation change? or does the Muslim League have some programmatic aces up its sleeves that the rest of the nation has yet to discover? This is a situation in which another alternative is badly needed. Left with no other choice, the people will vote either for the PPP or the Muslim League. But it should be apparent even to the most obtuse amongst us that the people are not  enthused by these choices. If they were to have an alternative to what is in effect a bipartisan dictatorship of mediocrity, the chances cannot be ruled out that they would plump for it. There may be many things wrong with Imran Khan the messenger. But there cannot be much quarrel with his message. Scan the political horizon from one end to the other and it will be obvious that today if anyone stands for change it is him. He is talking of things which the other politicos are not. And he is talking of things which touch the real concerns of ordinary people. After all, what is at issue is the VIP state whose perks and privileges will be the death of Pakistan. If anyone with the right brand name and image (an important consideration in politics) has entered the lists against this monster, it is Imran Khan. As I say, he may have many shortcomings (who of us does not?) but then he must be credited with entering the political arena at the right time and with saying just the right things. Through his cricketing career and later through his cancer hospital he has given sufficient proof of his determination. It would be foolish to underestimate such a man. Imran and the cynicism of the chattering classes Ayaz Amir DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 16 May 1996 Issue : 02/20 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1996/16My96.html#


KARACHI, May 13: Former cricket hero Imran Khan said on Monday that his newly-formed Tehrik-i-Insaf (Movement for Justice) after organising itself into a political party would purge the country s political system after sweeping national elections in 1998. It would also end perks to politicians like foreign medical treatment and abolish VIP lounges at the country s airports, he said. Mr Khan criticised Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto s recent CNN interview and said the situation in the country was completely different from what she was telling the international media. Anyone in the country can see there is corruption everywhere and yet the Prime Minister tells CNN there is no corruption. Nobody is fooled by these stories, he said. I know it s [politics] a really difficult task. I expect that the young people of the country will be in the forefront of this movement because they feel helpless and frustrated at what they see being done to the country s resources by the ruling elite, he said. I don t understand why the government spends so much money on expensive Mercedes and huge state-owned palaces when the country s social indicators are ranked among the lowest by the UN. The small ruling class which your tax money puts up never sends its children to government schools, never goes to a government hospital for treatment. Only if they waited in long lines like everybody else at government offices would they realise how bad it is for ordinary citizens, he said. Mr Khan said a team was at work on a comprehensive party constitution, and manifesto was already under way. He declined to give any specific names of people who might have already become involved in the Tehrik. These are names most people wouldn t know of because they are part of the silent majority. But let me tell you, they are people who can deliver.  Mr Khan said overseas Pakistanis several of whom he had met during the Shaukat Khanum hospital s fund-raising were another group which wanted to use its immense talent and economic clout to invest in the country but had always been discouraged by the corruption they faced here . Tehrik will end all  VIP perks if comes to power DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 16 May 1996 Issue : 02/20 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1996/16My96.html#tehr


NEW YORK, April 2: Cricket superstar Imran Khan will announce his entry into the political arena of Pakistan in Lahore, on April 21, the birth anniversary of Allama Iqbal, a highly informed sources close to Mr Khan told Dawn. The source said the ex-captain of Pakistan cricket team, has been pushed and cajoled into entering the foray by his well-wishers and Pakistanis abroad, who are willing to fund his campaign, to end the rampant lawlessness and corruption in the country. Mr Khan, who was in Dubai last week meeting Pakistani businessmen to test the waters for funding his political movement, has been given assurances of financial support by wealthy Pakistanis living in the United States. In an interview with the New York Times, Imran Khan indicated that he would form his own political party on a platform promising a crackdown on corruption. He feels that the United States is perhaps backing the wrong horse in the hope that it would hold off Muslim fundamentalism in Pakistan. He believes that Pakistani people s concern about lawlessness and corruption is at the core of the so-called Islamic fundamentalist movement in Pakistan. Most Pakistanis here feel that neither Ms Bhutto or her main rival Mian Nawaz Sharif, are capable of ending the scourge of corruption. The foreign media in Washington and New York has caught on to Mr Khan s ambitions and their interest in him and his wife Jemima has grown. Several Pakistani correspondents in the United States have been approached by the American media seeking to develop connections to interview the couple. When pointed out that perhaps the extraordinary interest shown in Imran Khan could be due to Ms Jemima s family connections, most here dismiss it, saying We know Imran Khan can deliver. He can strive to wipe out corruption and lawlessness which continues to undermine the integrity of the country. Imran Khan to enter politics this month Masood Haider DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 04 April 1996 Issue : 02/14 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1996/04Ap96.html#imra


TOBA TEK SINGH, July 12: The PPP high command has released a booklet Talking Points to counter anti-PPP remarks by Imran Khan. The PPP workers have been provided with such booklets. The booklet said: Imran Khan s cancer hospital was built with almost 90 per cent support of the government. The government contribution, included Rs 50 million donated by Mr Nawaz Sharif when he was in office, price free land in Lahore donated by Mr Nawaz Sharif, a medical camera worth more than US $2 million donated by a public
sector organisation during the Benazir Bhutto s government, and tax concession amounting to Rs 300-400 million for import of machinery given by the Benazir government. Free tickets were also given by PIA for fund raising efforts. It was only after eminent social worker Sattar Edhi alleged that Imran Khan wanted to rope him into an extra-constitutional overthrow of the Benazir government that the government stopped its support, the booklet says. It also claims that Imran Khan has never explained how many private patients are treated at full cost and how many patients are treated free at his cancer hospital nor has be explained why the cost is astronomically higher in his hospital than in government-owned hospitals. Regarding television advertising, the booklet says while Imran Khan complaints that the PTV does not allow ads for his hospital, he fails to mention that he was allowed ads on TV during and before the Benazir government. The ads were disallowed only after the Edhi episode. Imran Khan never refers to the PTV policy of not allowing ads to political parties or individuals in the name of a social cause. According to the booklet, Imran Khan says that he is against the VIP culture. Yet he insists on using the VIP lounge at airports, travels first class, holds his Press conferences in five-star hotels and drives expensive cars and jeeps. No-one would mind all this if Imran Khan did not lecture others on simplicity, the booklet says. PPP issues booklet to counter Imran Tariq Saeed DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 18 July 1996 Issue : 02/29  http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/1996/18Jl96.html#pppi