![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiiOzt087kixsTpKMVZpOBybEpggMpRfgl1HPSCWrQJXULq6P6RyDj2ghKGnnTg0tmHhKztlwoWQ_iQ_5O7dvy_FHhMuG2qaq8c89QEqyWyK67Ho2q-uIUilXL6IO18Vq6Wh8bPLq7-J24/s320/Maududi.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7ssqi3FFBggCKIBwlT_IZ1Ws-RYrXi2RS3wEJlEe2DT-pMRJq0zXA7RqMR6-ThKjDpcJ2B8Tm08wA4tOZvepHg898dEeZfG0dNBAqFEszxPD6nhUth1AupLiWVk6aHbRb8UbdOwz_tMw/s320/khomeini.jpg)
For example Khomeini once made a statement which was published in the Tehran times (Kitaab be Noujawanaan - P8) that if he conquers Madina Munawwarah, he will remove the two idols (Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) besides Prophet Mohammad (Peace be upon him). I am certain that no believer will accept such a statement against the great luminaries of Islam. Brother Amin, are we then to condemn only Khomeini and condone Mawdudi knowing well that Mawdudi was a close friend of Khomeini and was sympathetic to his course. In a book titled, 'Two brothers - Maududi and Khomeini' page 129, the following statement of Dr Ahmad Farouk Maududi (son of Abul-A'ala Maududi) was published in Roz Naame, Lahore - 29 September 1979, "Allama Khomeini had a very old and close relationship with Abba Jaan (father). Aayaatullah Khomeini translated his (fathers) books in Farsi and included it as a subject in Qum. Allama Khomeini met my father in 1963 during Hajj and my father's wish was to create a revolutionary in Pakistan similar to Iran. He was concerned about the success of the Iranian revolution till his last breath.'
ASA
Sorry I have no time to go in it. I know every word what Maulana wrote and there is nothing against the Qur'an and Sunnah. It must be your misunderstanding. Better correct yourself and understand Islam as a Deen and as a Movement. Then you will find your shortcomings in understanding Maulana and your approach to Allah's Deen
Shamim
=======================================
Dear Shamim Sahab,
This belief of yours that Mawdoodi didn't write anything against Quran and Sunnah is tantamount to saying that Mawdoodi was infallible and that it is itself is the negation of Quran and Sunnah.
Maulana Abu al Ala Moududi has written in his book Tafhumaat vol 1, "Muhaddithin may have also human weakness or errors.
Mawdoodi like any other human being, he was not infallible and free from error, especially when he spoke about things that he was not qualified to discuss and that were not his specialty, as is the case with the matter referred to Hadith [your favourite Ghair Matlu Wahi]. Mawdoodi made many mistakes with regard to his views on the Sunnah and the method of the scholars of hadeeth with regard to judging and distinguishing between ahaadeeth. Late Pakistani scholar Muhammad Ismael had written an important study entitled Mawqif al-Jamaa’at al-Islamiyyah min al-Hadeeth al-Nabawi (attitude of the Jama’at-e-Islami towards the Prophet’s hadeeth). See also – in Arabic – Zawaabi’ fi Wajh al-Sunnah by Salaah al-Deen Maqbool Ahmad (p. 117 ff).
Mawdoodi Jamat-e-Islami and Hadith:
Abu A`la Maududi is a man who reviled many of the Prophets of Allaah and the Companions of Allaah's Messenger as well as promoting un-Islamic revolutionary modes of thought.
This Article is complied with the help of Brother Shaikh Mustafa (India) There are still many article left in need of proper translation if any of our Brother comes forward for it will be appreciated because it is high time that our Ikhwani Brother Know that what Abu a'la Maududi has done, They are just Blindly Following him and taking his word as if he is a prophet of Allaah they are not aware of the serious mistakes he have made this is the man who reviled many of the Prophets of Allaah and the Companions of Allaah's Messenger as well as promoting un-Islamic revolutionary modes of thought.
You should know that Allaah, Most High says: {It is not for the believing man or woman, when Allaah and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision} (Soorah 33:36)
He, the Almighty also says: {And let those who oppose the Messenger’s commandment beware, lest some affliction befall them or a painful torment be inflicted upon them} (Soorah 24:63)
From the above Qur'ânic verses, it is clear that we are obliged to obey all the commandments of Allaah’s Messenger and he has ordered us in several authentic hadeeth to grow our beards and has forbidden us from shaving. He said: “Trim the moustache and grow the beard and be different from the Magiians (fire-worshippers)” (Narrated by Muslim)
This is what our beloved Prophet said and see what Maududi is saying to his followers
".......your approach that prophet (pbuh) used to keep the long beard so to keep that much long beard is the prophets sunnah. which meant that you considers that what prophet's habit is the same sunnah to which they (prophet Mohammed and the earlier prophets) came to establish. BUT from my way of thinking this is not the true defination of sunnah but i have a strong belief that if these things considered as sunnah and insisted to be implemented then it is one of the strong type of innovation (bida) and dangerous alteration in religion which resulted in bad results in past and can show bad results in future also ......" .{Tarjumanul Qur'ân part 26, no. 403, 605 page 274 edition may/june 1945} - ( jamaate-islami ko phachaniye - page 28).
When the Messenger of Allaah received two messengers from the Persian king, Kisraa, he observed that they had long moustaches and were beardless and said: “Woe to you! Who ordered you to do this?” So how would you feel, oh shaver, if the Messenger of Allaah were to turn away from you in disgust and say: “Woe to you! Who ordered you to do this?” what will you tell we were following Maulana Maududi's instructions when Allaah and his Messenger Muhammad has more right to be followed Allaah, Most High says: {It is not for the believing man or woman, when Allaah and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision} (Soorah 33:36)
Allaah also forbids us from wilfully changing His creation; He says: {So set you [oh, Muhammad,] your face towards the pure Religion, with the fitrah [natural state] in which He has created mankind. No change let there be in the creation of Allaah } (Soorah 30:30)
So, after this, oh, shaver, do you still cling to your belief that growing the beard is “ONLY A SUNNAH” ? May Allaah guide us all to the Straight Path.
Abdullah Ibn Abbaas said, "When "Bid'ah" is created then the Sunnah dies and this continues until that "Bid'ah" is living and the Sunnah is dead.
Hasan Ibn Attiya, one of the Ta'baeen said, "When the people accept the "Bid'ah" , Allah removes the Sunnah from among them and doesn't return it until the day of judgment."
Moreover, Disobedience to the Messenger is disobedience to Allaah, for he said: “Whoever obeys me, has obeyed Allaah, and whoever disobeys me, has disobeyed Allaah.” (Narrated by Al-Bukhaari)
Ibn Taimiyah, the great Muslim Mujaddid (Revivalist), scholar and Mujaahid said: “Shaving the beard is haraam (forbidden) - no scholar has ever permitted it.”
Allaah, Most High says: {We sent no Messenger but to be obeyed by Allaah’s leave } (Soorah 4:64)
This Ummah has been put to trial in current times is the emergence of a people like Maududi who in showing the people they are more knowledgeable, abrogate the Sharee’ah in the name of "revivalism" and facilitate all of the ways to corruption in the name of "understanding the ease and lenience of Islaam". And so they opened up evil and despicable avenues in the name of "ijtihaad". Then they belittled the affairs of the Sunnah in the name of the "Understanding of priorities"
See some of the sayings of Maududi's Religion
.... Religion is the name of ruling. shariah is the law of ruling system and worship is to follow the legacy of the system ...." {khutbat - page 217}- ( jamaate-islami ko phachaniye - page 49).
"People usually says that five pillars of islam, shahadah and prophethhood, salah, paying obligatory charity, fast in the month of ramdhan, pilgrimage and they have been in the confusion for long time that these are the things to be named as islam. The truth is that this is a big confusion which destroyed the way and practice of muslims." {kausar 9th february 1951 - speech of moudidi}- ( jamaate-islami ko phachaniye - page 61).
THIS IS TO SHOW THE NATURE OF MAUDUDI'S IGNORANCE OF FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES OF THE RELIGION.
Refer bukhari and muslim where five pillars of islam has been described as
1- shahadah
2-establishing salah
3-paying obligatory charity
4-fast in the month of ramdhan
5-pilgrimage
See what Maududi has to say about our Beloved Prophet 's statement about Dajjaal
Is the history of 1300 years is not proved that prophet mohammed's assumption (of dajjal) is not right" {tarjumanul quran part 28, no. 3}- (jamaate-islami ko phachaniye - page 80).
"the one eyed dajjal is just a telling there is no islamic ruling on that. there is no need to search for this type of thing. islam is not responsible for such a thing which is been popular among people. if this is been proved wrong it doesn't harm islam" { tarjumanul quran -ramzan and shawal addition hijri - 1364}- (jamaate-islami ko phachaniye - page 153).
You only Ikhwaani's tell us what is this Aqeedah of Maududi
"human may believe in Allah or refuse, prostate Allah or stone, worship allah or other or may worshipping by his will, but he is worhipping allah" {tafhimat - under heading 'islam me ibadat ka tassawur' - page 43} - (jamaate-islami ko phachaniye - page 150).
"The Angel in islamic terminology is nearly the same thing as been accepted in india, unaan and other country as the god (devta) and goddess (devi)" {tajdeed o ahaye deen - page 10} - ( jamaate-islami ko phachaniye - page 151).
See how Maududi guides his jamaa'at, that's why you'll find most of Ikhwani either Mutazalite's or Qutubiyyah
"No true person can tell that all 6 to 7 thousand ahadiths (of sahih bukhari) are totally correct" {the speech given by moudidi in barkat hali hall on 15th may 1955 noted by newspaper al-etesam dated 27th may 1955 and dated 3rd june 1955} - (source : jamaate-islami ko phachaniye - page 165).
See how he the temporary Nikah (mutah) which is declared as haram by prophet Muhammed is being made halal by Maududi creating hypothetical situation from his imagination. history of the world is unable to record a single situation till date as imagined by Maududi
"Lets assume that a boat got broken in the sea. only one male and female was able to escape and some how got floated to island where there is no human being. now they are bound to leave together. as per islamic ruling they can't do nikah also. for them no way left but to accept the terms between them and do the temporary nikah (mutah) till they reach the population or the population reach to them. temporary Nikah (mutah) is for this or for similar situations ." {tarjumanul quran -august 1955 - page 379} (jamaate- islami ko phachaniye - page 157).
Actually Maududi is compelled to say such things to maintain Harmony, As Every one is aware of Maududi's Relation with Raafidis (Shi'ites) even though his Imaam, Imaam Abu haneefah {rahima'ullah} often use to say "whoever doubts whether shi'ites are disbeliever has himself COMMITTED A KUFR
SEE THE PROPHET IN MAUDUDI
"we are in the search of people like khatija and abubakar who can listen to our call of truth and totally submit to that as that they are waiting for that only" {rawadad - jamaate islami part III page 23} - (jamaate-islami ko phachaniye - page 197).
Now any one can note that the person who is searching for the khatija and abubakr to follow him. what will be his position for himself .
Here are some More glimpses of the famous Maulana Maudoodi’s wisdom:
Please turn to page 340, vol. I of Tafheemul-Quran by Maudoodi. After discussing some silly details, Maudoodi comes with a brilliant conclusion:
Even today women captured in war should be distributed among soldiers and the soldiers be allowed to use them.
The Qur'ân in verse 47/4 states that: "the captives of war must be freed either for ransom or as a way of kindness. There is no other option."
It is permissible to marry little girls (before puberty). It is also permissible for the husband to have sex with them. (Mulla Maudoodi: Tafheem-ul-Qur’an Urdu, vol.5, p.571)
Hazrat Uthman burnt six volumes of the Qur'ân, which were all different tongues. Allaah and Rasool had not ordered him to do that. (Syed Maudoodi Tarjumanul Qura’n 1975, p. 39) How could Maudoodi be a witness to that?
Maudoodi had also suggested that interest from banks and Government funds should be designated as profit!
After declaring picture-taking ‘haram’, he says: “Photographs of leaders and public meetings do not qualify to be permitted or essential.” however His own, and his party’s pictures are a commonplace in the newspapers. (Rasail-o-Masail, Vol 1, page 120)
On the same page he termed pictures of the kings on the coins as idol-worshiping. However, when he himself was awarded the Shah Faisal Award, the medal had King Faisal’s image engraved on it and his pictures wearing it around his neck are a historical record.
Aout the hadith of Hazrat Sulaiman’s 100 wives Maudoodi explains: “Either Abu Hurairah made a mistake in hearing the Prophet, or he did not hear all of the narration.” (Rasail-o-Masail, Vol 2, page 27)
Responding to a question concerning praying to graves he says about the dead: “It is possible that you may be calling but they may not be listening. It is also possible that they may be able to listen but their spirit may not be there and you may be calling nobody. Or it may be that, that there soul may be there and praying to their Lord and you may tease them in your selfishness.” (Same, page 261)
Maudoodi quotes scholars from Hanafi Fiqh that if someone said ‘Divorce’ three times even before getting married, the woman he would marry will be divorced right away. (Same, page 188)
One of the early scholars, Al- Barbahaaree, one of the companions of Ahmed Ibn Hanbal , said, "Beware of "Bid'ah", because every "Bid'ah" started out as something small and resembling the truth and people were fooled by it and followed it until it became bigger and bigger and were trapped by it and it took them out of Islam."
Ibn Taymiyyah has a nice passage in one of his books showing that: "In fact, the kufr of Jews and Christians is because of "Bid'ah". They introduced new things into the religion and those things took them completely away from the true message of Musa (Moses) and Isaa (Jesus) Alaihumma Salam".
Imaam Ibnul Qayyim al-Jawziyyah: The war against the innovators is greater than the war against the Musrikeen.
Ahmad Ibn Hanbal once said, "The greatest sinner (faasiq) from the Ahl-Sunnah Wal Jamaah is better than the most pious person from Ahl-"Bid'ah".
After reading ALL these it should become clear to the one who is free from ta'assub and hizbiyyah that Maulana Maududi is most certainly not a mujaddid, or a scholar as is ignorantly propagated by many.
Regarding Abul Ala Maudoodi's Rejection of The Dajjal
Author :Jamaal Ibn Fareehaan al-Haarithee
Source : al-Ijwibatul-Mufeedah (p. 92) Translated By : Maaz Qureshi
Said Jamaal Ibn Fareehaan al-Haarithee in al-Ajwibatul-Mufeedah (p. 92), “Said al-Mawdoodee in his book Rasaa‘il wa Masaa‘il (p. 57), published in 1351H,
“The Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) used to think that the Dajjaal (Anti-Christ) would come out in his time, or close to his time. However, 1350 years passed away and many long generations came and went, yet the Dajjaal did not come out. So it is confirmed that what the Prophet (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) thought did not prove true!!”
And he added to the edition published in 1362H,
“Indeed, 1350 years have passed…yet the Dajjaal has not come out, so this is the reality.”
So this is clear rejection of the emergence of the Dajjaal, whose emergence has been narrated concurrently (tawaatur) in authentic ahaadeeth.
And he said (p. 55),
“It is confirmed that everything which is related in the ahaadeeth of the Prophet (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) concerning the Dajjaal is the opinion and analogical deduction of the Prophet (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam), and it is a doubtful misgiving from his affair.”
So is this not a rejection of the Dajjaal? Is this not a denial of the narration of the Messenger (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam), about which Allaah said,
“And he does not speak from his own desire. It is revelation inspired to him.” [Sooratun-Najm 53:3-4]
And he says in Arba’ah Mustalahaatul-Qur‘aanil-Asaasiyyah (p. 156),
“Allaah the Glorified commanded him (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) in Sooratun-Nasr to repent to his Lord due to what emanated from him in deficiencies and shortcomings in distributing the shares.”
Was not what Allaah described His Prophet (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) from the Attribute of al-’Uboodiyyah, which is from the most complete of human attributes sufficient for him? So He – the Sublime and Exalted - described him like that in many of the aayaat from His Book! Where is he from the statement of the Messenger (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) in the hadeeth of the three people who asked about his worship – and it is as if he is discussing this very affair – he said, “As for me, then I fear Allaah more than any of you…” To the end of the hadeeth.
No comments:
Post a Comment