Zaid Hamid, French Intelligence (SDECE) & History.

Zaid Hamid spews the same message as Aamir Liaquat but goes about it in a different way. Where Liaquat speaks deliberately and with an affected accent, preferring emotional appeals to facts, Hamid has a rapid-fire delivery and peppers his monologues with dubious statistics and frequent anecdotes. The major thrust of all of Hamid’s sermons is that the Muslim world in general and Pakistan specifically is being targeted by an unholy American-Indian-Israeli axis. In this worldview, the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan are the ‘bad’ Taliban who are agents of RAW and other nefarious intelligence agencies, while outfits like the Jamaat-ud-Dawa and Lashkar-e-Taiba are the ‘good’ Taliban fighting in Kashmir and taking the battle to the enemies. For a while Hamid’s entertaining but dangerous rants led to great TV ratings but soon the bottom fell out. Advertisers didn’t want to be associated with this brand of conspiracy theorising, and the novelty value of his act wore off. Rumours that he had once been associated with a man claiming to be a prophet and his appearance on an FIR for a murder case further sullied the Zaid Hamid brand. But his hiatus proved to be short-lived. On the occasion of Nawaz Sharif making unexpected peace overtures to India, Hamid was invited as an expert panelist on a talk show. By now his routine has become predictable; so much of what he said was tiresome but expected. He, however, decided to use this platform to launch a tirade against a new target: the South Asian Free Media Association (SAFMA). On a show hosted by Meher Bokhari on Dunya TV, Hamid accused SAFMA of being Indian-funded and called them RAW agents. Zaid Hamid, it must be noted, is criticised by Pakistani journalists and Islamic scholars alike for propagating conspiracy theories without an iota of truth in them. Currently, he is being sued by SAFMA. Meanwhile, Hamid’s protege and co-host in a show called Iqbal ka Pakistan, Ali Azmat, has returned to his roots to propagate his conspiracy theories. The former Junoon singer released a song “Bum Phatta” that encapsulated his and Hamid’s worldview in a three-minute rock song. The video featured Azmat in various guises meant to symbolise those who truly control the world, included among them a cabal of Zionist bankers (for more on Ali Azmat read a 2010 Newsline exclusive interview with the singer/songwriter). No amount of chemotherapy seems to be effective in eliminating this cancer that is worming its way and spreading through public discourse in Pakistan. REFERENCE: Questionable Preachings By Zain Ali 30 OCTOBER 2011 http://www.newslinemagazine.com/2011/10/questionable-preachings/

On February 22,2012, Zaid Hamid made a baseless allegation against Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi (Chairman Pakistan Ulema Council), posting a letter on his official Facebook page, written by UNESCO to General (R) Parvez Musharraf requesting him to send Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi to Mullah Omar to resolve the issue of destruction of the Bamyaan Monuments. Zaid Hamid claimed that Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi was a French Intelligence agent and was being sent by them to gather intelligence on Taliban before the invasion. Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi contacted ZHE immediately and we posted a note on our facebook page refuting what Zaid Hamid had claimed. Zaid Hamid was forced to remove the post from his official Facebook page after the rebuttal of Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi. On February 23,2012, a detail response was given to Zaid Hamid’s baseless allegations against Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi on ZHE Blog. Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi challenged Zaid Hamid to a public debate on the issue of calling him a French Intelligence Agent which Zaid Hamid never accepted. Now we have received an email from BT Volunteer Group, in which Zaid Hamid is claiming that it was Facebook that deleted the post and is asking his followers to spread the letter on all websites and blogs. Our question to Zaid Hamid is why didn’t he re-post the same letter on his official Facebook page? Why was he asking his followers to spread the letter when he himself could not re-post it? REFERENCE: Zaid Hamid fails to “Re-post” a post against Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi “Deleted” by Facebook. http://zaidhamidexposition.org/2012/04/09/zaid-hamid-fails-to-re-post-a-post-against-hafiz-tahir-mahmood-ashrafi-deleted-by-facebook/

Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi refutes allegations of Zaid Hamid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJxs-SmGybE

Zaid Zaman Hamid & General Hamid Gul

Tahir Ashrafi, on one hand claim to defend Mujahideen but on the other hand his dirty links are not just with RAW backed SAFMA but also with UN and French intelligence and he has been serving their interests for ages. Here we produce a confidential letter written by a UN officer just before the UN approved invasion of Afghanistan by the Zionists. Here, these UN Zionists are writing to Perzez Musharraf to send Tahir Ashrafi to Mullah Omar on the Bamiyan statue issues. This fasadi mullah was to plead the case of UN's french director, most probably to gather intelligence on Taliban before the US led invasion. Today, he works for SAFMA and RAW gathering intelligence on Mujahideen in Pakistan. This letter by UN clearly shows how much the crusaders trust this snake. Now he has also become the champion of Khatm e Nubuwwat also. Astaghfurullah! REFERENCE: Tahir Ashrafi - SAFMA - French intelligence - RAW Syed Zaid Zaman Hamid [Official] WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2012 http://brasstacks-media.blogspot.com/2012/02/tahir-ashrafi-safma-french-intelligence.html?m=1

Zaid Hamid - Lies and Deception Exposed


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8cOgUuu9kA

ISLAMABAD, Sept 16: Pakistan hopes to convince the Taliban to hand over Osama bin Laden in a last-ditch effort to ward off an impending US-led allied attack on Afghanistan, but deteriorating relations between the two leave very little hope that the initiative will be successful. The Musharraf government has absolutely no doubt in its mind that the US holds Osama and his protector, Mulla omar, fully responsible for the Sept 11 kamikaze attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. It is sending a high-ranking delegation to meet Mulla Umar, headed by General Mehmood of the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), to underline the point that the impending attack can destroy Afghanistan totally, and lead to a human catastrophe of unimaginable scale. General Mehmood, who was in Washington when the US faced its morning of terror, has been conveyed in no uncertain terms by the US officials what the mood in the United States is. Pakistan's plea is that while it is difficult choice for the Taliban but the costs of persisting with holding on to the line that proof of Osama's crime has to be produced before them to enable them to take a decision on the issue, will be death and destruction, and eventual fall of the Taliban government.

At present according to government sources, the US does not make a difference between Mulla Umar's men and Osama bin Laden unless the Taliban supreme leader severs his links with him and hands him over to the US. For Pakistan the considerations behind making the desperate effort to convince the Taliban to show flexibility are domestic, regional and global. Pakistani decision-makers are worried about a severe domestic backlash from the Taliban lobbies in the mosques and the bazaars. Sunday's rallies all over the country - more are planned today -- against the anticipated US strikes are just a tip of the iceberg of larger trouble that can erupt when the US military operation starts. That is why all the law-enforcement agencies have been given additional powers and a fully-fledged internal security plan, prepared at General Headquarters, and approved by President Gen Pervez Musharraf has been put in place. The governors of all four provinces, along with the respective area corps commanders, have been readied to meet with any exceptional law and order situation with standing orders to use force where necessary. Even more stringent measures have been taken for Karachi and the border areas of the NWFP and Balochistan, where the Afghan refugees are present in the thousands. Special monitoring and surveillance of the sectarian groups is being done and all possibilities of a nation-wide reaction by religious parties have been worked out. But still fears are that this may not be enough. The Taliban threat delivered by their ambassador to Pakistan, Mullah Abdus Salam Zaeef on Saturday of invading any regional country that will provide bases or air space to the American-led strike force, has been taken seriously by the government.

Pakistan officials say that they are extremely disappointed with this statement. They see this as audacious and uncalled for and a sad reflection on the sense of gratitude that the Taliban should have, considering that Pakistan, at grave risk to its own image, has been sticking its neck out for them. More than that Pakistani officials see in the threat a real potential for the Taliban in a moment of crisis using their Madaris links inside Pakistan to create upheaval and unrest. Pakistan officials also believe that there is a real danger of sectarian terrorism erupting in the wake of the strikes because the Taliban continue to harbor some of the most wanted sectarian criminals on their soil. The other danger to which the Musharraf government is paying attention to is that of random terrorism of the sort that Pakistan has experienced emanating primarily from Afghanistan. In the 80s and early 90s Pakistan cities and bazaars were repeatedly hit by bombs that went off in crowded places killing hundreds of people. However, Pakistan's biggest threat comes not from the ordinary Taliban or sympathisers of Osama bin Laden, but from that close circuit of friends who have the resources to carry out massive operations inside its territory. If the case that the US is building against Osama bin Laden has any factual basis, Pakistan is the most vulnerable state in the world to terrorism. That is why, some government military observers believe, intelligence sharing with the US is of vital importance. Because it will be Pakistan that will have to deal with the blow-back of the inferno that Afghanistan will become when the military operation starts against Afghanistan.

Just as worrying are regional concerns for the Musharraf government. Pakistan is mortally fearful of the possibility of the facilities that it will grant to the US troops being misused. Military analysts admit that Pakistan will bear the brunt of a fully-fledged military operation in its neighbourhood because of its geo-graphic proximity to Afghanistan. More precisely, when the operation starts the sheer scale of it and the confusion it may generate can afford, according to senior military officials, an opportunity to take the risk of sabotaging Pakistan's strategic assets - the nuclear installations. This is the reason why extra measures have been taken to guard these installations and the air force has been instructed to hunt down any aerial danger in Pakistan's air-space. The details of which air-path can be used by the US-led forces have been worked out and there are other routes that are out-bounds for any alien aircraft. Pakistan policy-makers are also concerned about the possibility of an accidental or misfired hit at any of Pakistan's vital installations. Modern weapons especially aerial weapons that can move in all the wrong directions. Pakistan is equally concerned over the new political arrangement in Afghanistan. The strikes are surely going to leave the Taliban totally destroyed. For decades Pakistan has invested in the policy of having a friendly government in Afghanistan, and the Taliban, when they had not become an international pariah, were the closest it could come to that idea.

However, with the Taliban likely to be destroyed as a political entity in the wake of the strikes and the movement disintegrating along its tribal and local lines, the emerging scenario can lead to a political arrangement that would not be according to the wish list of Pakistan. Pakistan officials still hope that they will be able to have a say in the final shape of the new Afghanistan government -- if it did come to that point. In fact this is one of the many issues that Pakistan has put forward to the US in its on-going discussions with Washington. However, it is not sure yet what will be the response of the international community, particularly the US, to Pakistan playing such a role because of late Islamabad has been, rightly or wrongly, seen by a majority of the countries around the world as part of the problem in Afghanistan. But the most immediate concern for the Musharraf government is the US pressure. Close associates of President General Pervez Musharraf say that he is under tremendous pressure because "events are moving at a bewildering pace." Saturday night's telephone call from the US President George Bush was not just to thank him on his support but to also ask what has Pakistan decided on providing logistical assistance to the military operation. The US is not keeping according to the schedule of Pakistan's final decision; it wants a decision and a final detailed yes according to its own plans - not all of which have been shared with Pakistan. Pakistan according to some officials wants the US to also provide it with some incentives: economic and military assistance, removal of sanctions, debt relief, active role in helping it to solve the Kashmir problem and no role of India and Israel in this military operation. However, the signals from Washington are that while these demands will be considered sympathetically, at this point in time the only incentive that is available to Pakistan is negative. "Pakistan has the option to live in the 21st century or the Stone Age" is roughly how US officials are putting their case. The pressure is being added by advice from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries that have sent message and emissaries to convey their sentiments to General Pervez Musharraf. Against this background, Pakistan's best hope is that its delegation will come back with the good news of Taliban changing its position on Osama bin Laden. REFERENCE: Last-ditch effort to ward off impending attack Special Correspondent DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 22 September 2001 Issue : 07/38 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/2001/sep2201.html#last

ISLAMABAD, Sept 18: The high-level delegation led by ISI Chief Lt. Gen. Mahmood came back, leaving Taliban behind mussing over tough choices which would be further discussed at a meeting of 600 Afghan clerics in Kabul. No official announcement about the outcome of two-days discussions with the Taliban in Kandahar and Kabul was made after the arrival of the delegation. When contacted a highly placed government source said no official announcement was expected till a decision was made from Afghan Shura which is reportedly meeting in Kabul. "The delegation went to Afghanistan not for negotiations but to impress upon the Kabul regime the gravity of the situation," Foreign Office Spokesman Riaz Ahmed Khan told a news briefing earlier in the day. Unconfirmed reports said the Taliban had set three conditions including lifting of UN sanctions, commitment of financial assistance for restructuring of war ravaged country and trial of Osama bin Lander in a neutral country for handing over the Saudi millionaire and alleged prime suspect in World Trade Centre and Pentagon incidents. The foreign office spokesman did not offer any comment on the outcome of the talks or the three conditions reportedly set by Taliban. REFERENCE: ISI team back from Afghanistan By Faraz Hashmi DAWN WIRE SERVICE Week Ending : 22 September 2001 Issue : 07/38 http://www.lib.virginia.edu/area-studies/SouthAsia/SAserials/Dawn/2001/sep2201.html#isit

Zaid hamid and yusuf kazab ka jalwa

On the morning of Sept. 11, Goss and Graham were having breakfast with a Pakistani general named Mahmud Ahmed -- the soon-to-be-sacked head of Pakistan's intelligence service. Ahmed ran a spy agency notoriously close to Osama bin Laden and the Taliban. A Goss aide handed a note to his boss. Goss read it and handed it to Graham. Soon they would evacuate the Capitol, but not before Goss, the designated speaker pro tempore, symbolically opened the House for one minute. The discussion that morning touched on Taliban links to terrorism, but Goss says his greatest worry was the dispute in Kashmir -- and the nuclear weapons possessed by feuding Pakistan and India. A few weeks earlier, Goss and other lawmakers had visited the region on a fact-finding tour, but he admits he wasn't focused on bin Laden at the time. "I had it wrong," he says. "I was looking east [toward Kashmir] instead of west [toward Afghanistan] when I was standing in Islamabad." He says this with no embarrassment or defensiveness. This is part of why people like Goss. When he gets it wrong, he doesn't dissemble. "Seek Ye the Truth" -- that's the CIA's motto. He would affix the same slogan to his investigation. "This is a professional, responsible, nonpartisan activity," Goss says. But as far as what kind of weaknesses, flaws or lapses (don't call them failures) he thinks the investigation will uncover -- and how to fix them -- there is little point asking. The chairman is an impenetrable target in a denied area. That's the way it is in the intelligence game. "You can spend two hours in here saying, 'I've talked to Porter Goss,' and still not have a clue what my plans and intentions are," the Company man says, before bidding farewell to his interrogator with a handshake and smile. REFERENCE: A Cloak But No Dagger An Ex-Spy Says He Seeks Solutions, Not Scapegoats for 9/11 By Richard Leiby Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, May 18, 2002; Page C01 http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A36091-2002May17?language=printer

Funny ZAID HAMID Exposed


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEvgXT1MLDE

On the eve of the 9/11 terror attacks, in a crucial National Security Council meeting at the White House, Colin Powell, the then U.S. secretary of state, strongly asserted: “We have to make it clear to Pakistan and Afghanistan, this is show time.” General Mahmood Ahmed, who was on an official visit to the United States as a CIA guest, and Maleeha Lodhi, Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, were asked to attend a meeting with senior American officials on September 12, 2001. To be fully prepared, Mahmood called Musharraf to discuss the emerging scenario and take instructions for the important meeting. Musharraf told him to report back immediately after the meeting and gauge how the wind was blowing. On the morning of September 12, the U.S. deputy secretary of state, Richard Armitage, in a “hard-hitting conversation,” told Mahmood that Pakistan had to make a choice—“you are either 100 percent with us or 100 percent against us—–there is no gray area.” In the words of Armitage, Mahmood “was immediately willing to cooperate.” In the afternoon, Mahmood was invited to CIA headquarters at Langley, Virginia, where he told George Tenet, the CIA director, that in his view Mullah Omar, the Taliban chief, was a religious man with humanitarian instincts and not a man of violence! This was a bit difficult for the CIA officials to digest. General Mahmood was firmly told that Mullah Omar and the Taliban would have to face U.S. military might if Osama bin Laden along with other Al-Qaeda leaders were not handed over without delay. To send the message across clearly, Richard Armitage held a second meeting with Mahmood the same day, informing him that he would soon be handed over specific American demands which are “non-negotiable”, to which Mahmood reiterated that Pakistan would cooperate. Having gone through the list that was provided to him on September 13, Mahmood declared that he was quite clear on the subject and that “he knew how the President thought, and the President would accept these points.” Mahmood then faxed the document to Musharraf and in a subsequent call conveyed his impressions. Mahmood was of the view that the words used by Armitage about Taliban were in fact meant for Pakistan and he didn’t consider it necessary to emphasize this point. Musharraf genuinely believed that such a direct threat was given. While Musharraf had hardly gone through the list of demands, his aide de camp informed him that Colin Powell was on the line. Musharraf liked and respected Powell, and the conversation was not going to be a problem, he thought. He told him that he understood and appreciated the U.S. position, but that he would respond to the U.S. demands after having discussed these with his associates. Powell was a bit perplexed at this response and thought it necessary to inform him that General Mahmood had already assured them that these demands would be acceptable to the government of Pakistan. It is not certain if Musharraf bit his lip when he heard this, but he did grit his teeth, and his relationship with Mahmood suffered a crack. Interestingly, Mahmood on his return from the US, also informed Musharraf about his visit to the Pentagon after the tragedy and argued that there were no traces of any commercial plane having hit the Pentagon. He also made a case that in his assessment, the attacks were an inside job! Some senior generals surrounding Musharraf at that time were convinced by this line of argument largely based on Mahmood’s “first hand” narrative. On September 16, 2001, Musharraf sent a delegation to the Taliban with the mission to convince them to hand over Osama bin Laden. It included Lieutenant General Mahmood, and a group of religious figures known to have good relations with the Taliban. The mission failed, but more worrisome was the revelation that Mufti Shamzai of the Binori mosque in Karachi, instead of conveying the official message, encouraged Mullah Omar to start a jihad against the United States if it attacked Afghanistan. Musharraf came to know of this fact through an ISI official who had accompanied the team and had loyally reported the matter to Musharraf. After this, Mahmood, whose arrogance and presumption had come to grate on Musharraf’s expansive tolerance by now, was offered the ceremonial slot of chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, because Musharraf was still grateful to him for what he had done for him on the eve of October 12, 1999. Mahmood refused the offer thinking that he was indispensable and a possible successor to Musharraf. But things were changing fast and Musharraf now had the support of most of his corps commanders about his new alignment with the US (except Generals Usmani, Mahmood and Mohammad Aziz who had advised caution). Gauging the mood of changing circumstances and knowing that Musharraf was about to make some important changes in the military, Mahmood, through a close friend of Musharraf, a retired brigadier based in Islamabad, put in a request to be retained as director general of ISI, even if an officer junior to him was to be promoted to the rank of four star general for the post of CJCSC. This time Musharraf refused and Mahmood had to go home. This sudden departure of Mahmood led to many rumors. Mahmood went into a low profile and started working on his favorite project – a book on the 1965 war. When he finished the work, he sent the manuscript to GHQ for permission to publish. Interestingly the title of the work was “Myth of 1965 victory”. Musharraf himself looked at the manuscript and noted on the file that Mahmood should re-consider the title – especially use of the word myth in relation to the 1965 war. This was enough of a hint and Mahmood almost shelved the idea of publishing the book for a while. Mahmood had already requested Musharraf for a job and thought that he should not annoy Musharraf on any count. He was right - he did get a job soon. And instead, Musharraf started working on his book project. REFERENCE: Inside story of Musharraf-Mahmood tussle By Hassan Abbas Tuesday, September 26, 2006 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006\09\26\story_26-9-2006_pg7_13 What happened between Musharraf & Mahmood after 9/11 attacks MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 http://watandost.blogspot.com/2006/09/what-happened-between-musharraf.html

Pious Patriot Zaid Hamid VS Treasonous Heretics in SAFMA - PART - 2

Now these snakes will be dragged to the court and confronted with their crimes against Pak Sarzameen InshAllah. Thousands of Pakistanis have joined hands alhamdolillah to expose and confront these snakes and now the Petition has been filed in the Supreme Court! By Allah, we will defend our Medina e Sani, its sacred ideology, its geography, its armed forces and our freedom! [Sic].” The petition itself, though littered with spelling mistakes and grammatical errors, is poisonous drivel supposedly to terrorise into silence the journalists, media persons and activists associated or thought to be associated with SAFMA. It takes a convoluted approach to basically posit that the respondents have allegedly been undermining M A Jinnah and Allama Iqbal’s message, the two-nation theory, the ideology of Pakistan and above all the ‘glory of Islam’, at the behest of India, and thus portend an existential risk to Pakistan’s national security. It makes full use of the Ziaul Haq-inducted clauses of the constitution and asks for first restraining these journalists and activists and then trying them for sedition. While not explicitly sought, the implication of invoking Article 6 is that the named and unnamed individuals thus be physically eliminated. Hamid has specifically asked the court that under Article 19 of the constitution, the free speech of the individuals he has named should be restricted in the “interest of the glory of Islam, integrity, security or defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court.” On his blog and in his various media appearances, Hamid has expressly described what he means by the “glory of Islam”. He wrote on his blog: “Our destiny is Ghazwa e Hind NOT aman ki asha! They spread vulgarity, filth, Hinduism, pornography, Hindu culture, dance and music within our youth.” Hamid has based this on a single Hadith, which appears in the only an-Nasai compilation of the Hadith: “A group of you will conquer India, Allah will open for them (India) until they have come with its kings chained — Allah having forgiven their sins. When they return back (from India), they will find ibn Maryam (Jesus) in Syria.” Interestingly, it is not just the secular elements of SAFMA who differ with Hamid’s concept of the glory of Islam by waging war on India in the purported ‘Ghazwa-e-Hind’. Respected Islamic scholars have a broad range of points of view on this Hadith. Some like Javed Ghamidi consider it a weak narration, which like many other fabricated ones was inducted in the corpus of Hadith to suit the political plans of the Ummayads when they wanted to invade India. The late Dr Israr Ahmed held another view that the Muslim invasion of India prophesied in the narration has already taken place. He had stated in his lectures that the Ghazwa-e-Hind could have been either Mahmud Ghaznavi or Muhammad Bin Qasim’s invasion of India. Allama Dr Tahirul Qadri holds yet another view that the tradition is part of the signs of the end of time and the forecast invasion will actually be by armies originating not in Pakistan but from the Arab lands. Then there is the view of the Ahl-e-Hadith, expressed some time back in the periodical Muhhaddis, which categorically rejects this narration as concocted. The Shia books of Hadith make no mention of such a prophecy at all. I am confident that the seasoned ulema of the various schools of thought would feel duty-bound to appear before the court to present their expert opinion when asked by the court and/or SAFMA. REFERENCE: COMMENT: Zaid Hamid goes to court — Mohammad Taqi Thursday, April 05, 2012 http://archives.dailytimes.com.pk/editorial/05-Apr-2012/comment-zaid-hamid-goes-to-court-mohammad-taqi

Zaid Zaman Hamid & General Hamid Gul

Ghazwa-e-Hind By Dr Israr Ahmed


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCjYGoMC-4g


Ghazwa-e-Hind Hadith by Shaykh-ul-Islam Dr Tahir ul Qadri


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR9QI8PuITU


KAYA GAZWA E HIND KA AHADIS MAIN ZIKAR HAI?Al-Shaikh Al-Mufti Mohammad Ashraf ul Qadri


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnV_EMj9KV4

SAFMA should raise this in SC that Zaid Hamid and Kasuri are alleging that Treacherous and Treasonous SAFMA are a Threat to Glory of Islam obviously SAFMA being supporters of Pak-India Friendship but are these Two Muslim Madressahs and one is based in Holy City of Varanasi (Banaras) and that too a Salafi Madressah  http://www.aljamiatussalafiah.org/arabic/about_us.html  and another is Daarul Uloom Deoband in Muzzaffar Nagar UP  http://www.darululoom-deoband.com/  . If SAFMA is Kaafir and Ghaddar then the status of the Faith of these Two Madressah must be clarified by the SC and Shariat Bench of Pakistan that whether these Two Madressahs in India are violating Glory of Islam or not above all Pakistan should break ties with Saudi Arabia because Saudi Arabi is also India's Friend.

Pak CYBER Force, ZAID Hamid EXPOSED, ANNIHILATED


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxTVgUoqouM

We (I will use we because Zaid Sb love to use "we" when he speaks) must respect Zaid Hamid Sb views and views of Mr. Ahmed Qureshi but we are all declared "Faasiq and Fajir (Flagrant sinners) and it has also been alleged in the petition of Mr. Zaid Hamid/Kasuri that "Treasonous, Treacherous SAFMA and Gang of Hoodlum in Safma" are giving bad name to the Glory of Islam therefore this matter should be dealt forthwith. Men are ordered to grow beard and trim mustaches in Islam and I accept these command literally and also believe in these command in letter and spirit and declare that in the life hereafter those who have not followed these two commands would be punished but shaving a beard regularly or keeping Mustahces like Magians (Zoroastrian) as I have is one thing but trimming the beard after growing is Insult of Sunnah, please note that Mr Zaid Hamid, Mr. Ahmed Qureshi and Lawyer of Zaid Hamid i.e. Mr Kasuri all three are violating Islam ultimately damaging Glory of Islam Zaid Hamid trim his beard and has pony tail (another Pagan tradition used to be the practice of Kaafir Mongols), Mr Kasuri is totally clean shaved and wears Kaafir Clothes like Three Piece Suit with a Cross (Necktie) in his neck and Mr. Ahmed Qureshi roam around like a Twink., here are the commands Ruling on trimming the beard because it looks scary. REFERENCE: Ruling on trimming the beard because it looks scary Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid http://islamqa.info/en/ref/9977

Pakistan in views of Sufis part 1_2


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_bzvkv3VWE

Country was Made by Allah, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and Companion Ali (May Allah be pleased with him) - This demented quack has no shame Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) & Companion Ali (May Allah be pleased with him) are dead and passed away centuries ago and buried in Medina and Kufa respectively then how come they made Pakistan. Question about a strange Sufi way of worship http://islamqa.info/en/ref/11938/sufis Are the Sufi shaykhs really in contact with Allaah? Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid http://islamqa.info/en/ref/4983/sufis

Pakistan in views of Sufis part 2_2


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGviF8hApL4

Zaid Hamid freely mix with Women without Hijab and he raise finger on SAFMA's violation of Glory of Islam:) about Hijab Verses and hadeeth about hijab http://islamqa.info/en/ref/13998/hijab

Iqbal Ka Pakistan 14th August Special Imran khan and zaid hamid Part 3/9


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8KZiyBA6lc

Iqbal Ka Pakistan 14th August Special Imran khan and zaid hamid Part 4/9


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wm3RjYOqtyU

It looks like a revenge scene from a movie but it has actually happened. After eight long years, Dr Tanvir Ahmed Khan, a former foreign secretary, reclaimed the title of Director General Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad (ISSI), a post he lost to Dr Shireen Mazari in August 2002. Despite the fact that Dr Shireen has been unceremoniously removed from the post at least 15 months before the expiry of her contract in August 2009, she has earned the distinction of being the longest serving DG of the Foreign Office-controlled think tank. Dr Tanvir's held the post between 1998-2000. He was appointed around the time of the May 1998 nuclear detonation, and was in the lead of the pro-bomb lobby in Pakistan. However, after Gen Musharraf took over he lost favour with the military and was replaced by the hawkish Shireen Mazari. Shireen Mazari reacted angrily on the termination of her contract on May 14. She told the media that the news of her removal was conveyed to her by the new foreign secretary Salman Bashir. She likened her removal to the sacking of former foreign secretary Riaz Muhammad Khan. She claimed the United States government had influenced her removal as she was writing hard-hitting articles highlighting US intervention in internal Pakistani affairs. Riaz Mohammad Khan who took over as the Foreign Secretary in Feb 2005 was sacked by the PPP government last month. His term in office was due to end on Oct 1, 2008. Mazari also claimed that on May 15 she was ordered to leave the office in 15 minutes as the new DG was to take over. Clarifying, a foreign office spokesman said: "Dr Shireen Mazari had been Director General of ISSI since August 2000. She has been the longest serving Director General of the Institute. There is no particular reason to replace Dr Mazari. Dr Mazari was a contract employee and had served with great distinction. All her contract terms will be honoured. Dr Tanvir Ahmed Khan, who is a distinguished scholar and former Foreign Secretary, will take over as the new Director General (ISSI)." During her stint in ISSI, Mazari was more recognised for her hard-hitting views reflecting some portions of the establishment. She has close relations with Mushahid Husain Syed, PML-Q secretary general and his wife Dushka Syed, a professor in Quaid-e-Azam university. Mushahid, a confidante of Nawaz Sharif was briefly detained after Sharif's removal but later he became an ardent supporter of Musharaf's regime. Along with Dushka Syed, Shireen was also seen leading civil society protests in 2006 against conversion of a public park into a mini-golf court by the Capital Development Authority and in 2007 against Jamia Hafza dubbing it 'MullaGardi'. Recently she was seen openly criticising US policies and visits of PPP co-chairperson to the residence of the American ambassador. Dr Tanvir, who had served in Benazir Bhutto's first government as foreign secretary in the late 1980s, has gradually shifted from his PTV-friendly hawkish views to a more diversified outlook on security issues. In fact after his removal as DG ISSI he gradually became a leading critic of the military-led government. Last year he was present at the launch of Ayesha Siddiqa Agha's controversial book Military Inc. at a time when the government forbade all hotels and clubs not to give a place for the function. In December last year, while opposing the Musharraf emergency, he was part of 20 former ambassadors and foreign secretaries who called upon Musharraf to restore the rule of law and reinstate senior judges. Later, he also supported the PPP position that Benazir Bhutto's murder investigations should be done under UN. Dr Khan said the government had offered him four positions including that of DG ISSI. Out of those, he must have preferred going back to his old job. Islamabad has three think tanks -- Institute of Regional Studies (IRS), ISSI and Islamabad Policy Research Institute. Their functions are not much different from each other. Over the years these think tanks have failed to produce any original work that could influence or change the country's regional or domestic policy. Most of the research done by these institutes is based on secondary sources. They are mainly following the official line on controversial issues. ISSI is mainly seen as a think tank made for retired foreign secretaries who are accommodated as its DGs and Chairmen. During Dr Tanvir's first stint, there was no chairman but later Aga Shahi became its chairman. After his demise now former foreign secretary and minister Inamul Haq has been serving as its chairman. ISSI has two directors and seventeen research fellows. IRS, controlled by federal information ministry, is considered a post-retirement place for military officers. Since its inception in 1982, many retired military men have served it as its president. Many of them developed the required academic credential while on the job. The incumbent president Maj Gen. (Retd.) Jamshed Ayaz Khan took over in April 2002. Before joining the Institute, he served as Additional Secretary Defense Production (DP) Division of the Ministry of Defense from 1999-2001. The nascent IPRI was established by a group including Shireen Mazari, Mushahid Husain and Gen Syed Rafaqat, who was also the founder president of the Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI). But soon controversy struck and the president was replaced by Brig (Ret) Sahukat Qadir who was also forced to resign. Since Oct 2000, Dr. Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema, a academician who previously served as the Chairman of International Relation's Department as well as Defence and Strategic Studies Department of Quaid-e-Azam University, has been working as IPRI's President. It has been a tradition that with the change in the government the head of these institutes are also changed. No wonder Shireen's ouster was seen as the first in line. REFERENCE: Non-thinking tanks With the change in the government, the head of govt institutes are also changed. Dr Shireen Mazari's ouster is a case in point By Nadeem Iqbal http://jang.com.pk/thenews/may2008-weekly/nos-25-05-2008/dia.htm#2

Jihadis will have no place in Pakistan: PM Imran Khan


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBYeOI_7V5c


Army, ISI will be under me if I'm the PM: Imran Khan


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alPlGKx47gU

Karan Thapar: Let me press this like this, the LeT was supposedly declared a militant group and prescribed way back in 2002. But it simply re-morphed and re-appeared as Jamat ud Dawa and Falat-e-Insaniyat and it operates freely as you know. Hafiz Saeed, its leader, regularly makes anti-India hate speeches. Will you put a stop to that?

Imran Khan: Well, I again repeat, that if there are no militant groups operating from within Pakistan, which should be our statement policy, and as things stand today, Pakistan has no choice but to go this route.

Karan Thapar: But when you say no militant groups does that specifically include not just LeT, but also Jamat ud Dawa, Falat-e-Insaniyat, Jaish e Mohammad, in other words those groups that target India?

Imran Khan: Well not just India. There are groups that are targetting people within Pakistan. We have a number of militant groups.

Karan Thapar: But you are not answering my question. The Indians will think you are evading it.

Imran Khan: No. When I say no militant groups, it means no militant groups.

Karan Thapar: Including Jamat ud Dawa?

Imran Khan: Exactly. There would not be any militant groups operating within Pakistan. How can I be more specific than that?

Karan Thapar: Would you name Jamat ud Dawa, Falat-e-Insaniyat and Hafez Saeed and say that you will put a check to these three people? Will you name them?

Imran Khan: Look, I am living in Pakistan. Pakistan at the moment is the most polarised country in the world. A governor gets shot, his assassin becomes a hero. There’s no point in becoming a hero right now in this country where there’s no rule of law. Life is very cheap here. So, just let me put it as a policy statement. Don’t just go into details. As a policy statement, it should answer your question. No militant groups operating from within Pakistan.

Karan Thapar: Let me raise a second concern that India had. They believe, and the Americans agree, and similarly believe that the ISI has been involved in carrying out terror attacks against India, whether its through the Haqqani group targetting the Indian embassy in Kabul or whether its through the LeT targetting Mumbai in 2008. Will you reign in the ISI?

Imran Khan: Well, in your last interview I said as the Prime Minister of a country where the responsibility lies on me, so should the authority be on me. Its not going to happen that here’s me holding responsibility and some group is operating independently, whether its ISI or any other group. So the answer is ISI and the Army would be under a civilian governmental control. And if I can’t do it, I would much rather resign. But if I take responsibility it would mean that whatever policies made by our Cabinet will have to be enforced at every section, with every institution. Now when you come to Afghanistan, I just have one tiny comment to make. To blame Pakistan where 140, 000 troops of the United States and NATO have failed, the greatest military machinery ever has failed and to blame a few thousand Haqqani group from Pakistan, not allowing them to win in Afghanistan, not only is this completely not plausible but its defying history. Afghans have never accepted foreign invaders. REFERENCE: Will stop terror groups if elected PM: Imran Pakistan | Updated Nov 13, 2011 at 07:28pm IST http://ibnlive.in.com/news/build-trust-put-kashmir-on-back-burner-imran/201956-56.html

Pious Patriot Zaid Hamid VS Treasonous Heretics in SAFMA - PART - 1

The petition itself, though littered with spelling mistakes and grammatical errors, is poisonous drivel supposedly to terrorise into silence the journalists, media persons and activists associated or thought to be associated with SAFMA - Never a dull moment in the land of the pure, is there? Just as one is about to look past a real or made-up disaster, new tomfooleries appear on the horizon. A certain Syed Zaid Zaman Hamid has now declared war on the Pakistani liberal intelligentsia. More specifically, Sir Zaid — as his followers affectionately and reverently call him — has announced a legal battle against the South Asia Free Media Association (SAFMA) though a constitutional petition filed in the Supreme Court (SC) of Pakistan. Ordinarily one might have shrugged and moved on but then Sir Zaid is no ordinary human. In the petition, filed through that champion of constitutional and judicial supremacy, Sahibzada Ahmad Raza Khan Kasuri, Hamid identifies himself as one of the 500 most influential Muslims around the world. His 164-word introduction enumerates Hamid’s accomplishments as a defence analyst, geopolitical strategist, an intellectual and a scholar of international repute who, inter alia, has ‘very actively worked in the Afghan Jehad from 1986-1992’. Studies produced by his think-tank Brass Tacks are “read and acknowledged by friendly countries, national and international media and national security organisations like Pakistan armed forces and Intelligence agencies.” Now who exactly and in what armed forces agency acknowledges whatever is put out by Brass Tacks is for the ISPR to clarify. Timed to appear along with the petition was the following salvo on Hamid’s blog and Facebook page: “Allahu Akbar!!!! Today, we have filed a Petition in the Supreme Court against SAFMA for High Treason against Pak Sarzameen (land), its sacred ideology, its beloved founding fathers and waging a war against Pak Sarzameen, armed forces and our freedom on behalf of the enemies. We have demanded Death Penalty under article 6 High Treason law for All SAFMA leaders, members and supporters like Imtiaz Alam, Marvi Sermed, Najam Sethi, Hamid Mir, Asma Jahangir, Hasan Nisar, Khaled Ahmed, Beena Sarwar, Nusrat Javed and Ali Chishti! REFERENCE: COMMENT: Zaid Hamid goes to court — Mohammad Taqi Thursday, April 05, 2012 http://archives.dailytimes.com.pk/editorial/05-Apr-2012/comment-zaid-hamid-goes-to-court-mohammad-taqi

Zaid Hamid : Petition Filed Against SAFMA in Supreme Court (Urdu version) !!!

Zaid Zaman Hamid & General Hamid Gul

Allama Tahir Ashrafi's open challenge to Zaid Hamid for a debate


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2HwxEvuorM

KARACHI: As thousands of people attended the funeral of Mufti Saeed Ahmed Jalalpuri here on Friday, police booked Zaid Hamid, who claims to be a security consultant and strategic defence analyst, for the murder of the prominent religious scholar, his son and two associates. Mufti Saeed Jalalpuri of Aalmi Majlis-i-Tahaffuz-i-Khatm-i-Nabuat, his son Huzaifa Jalalpuri and close associates Fakhruz Zaman and Abdul Rehman were returning from Jamia Masjid Khatman-un-Nabi in Gulshan-i-Iqbal on Thursday night when four to five gunmen sprayed their car with bullets, killing all of them. SSP Javed Mahar of Gulsha-i-Iqbal Town said the FIR had been registered under Sections 302 (premeditated murder), 324 (attempt to murder), 109 (punishment of abetment if the act abetted committed in consequence and where no express provision is made for its punishment) and 34 (common intention) against Zaid Hamid (Zaid Zaman Hamid) on the complaint of Mufti Jalapuri’s close aide Hafiz Shabbir. He said that although the text of the FIR did not mention the profession of the accused, the investigators were told by the complainant that they had nominated Zaid Hamid who appeared in TV shows and delivered lectures mainly on security and defence issues. Anwaar Ahmed, another aide of Mufti Jalalpuri, told Dawn that the scholar used to actively expose Zaid Hamid who, he alleged, was a close associate of ‘a person who had laid claim to prophethood’. Anwaar Ahmed said: “In late 1990s a man named Yusuf Kazzab emerged and claimed prophethood, who was aided and assisted by Zaid Hamid. At that time he was known as Zaid Zaman Hamid but currently he has cut his name short to Zaid Hamid”. He said he had insisted that both names be mentioned in the FIR, because his organisation suspected his role in the killing of Mufti Jalalpuri. REFERENCE: Daily DAWN – Zaid Hamid named in Jalalpuri murder FIR, March 13 2010 http://www.dawn.com/news/887019/zaid-hamid-named-in-jalalpuri-murder-fir

Zaid Hamid : Petition Filed Against SAFMA in Supreme Court !!!

Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi Talks About Fitna Of Zaid Hamid At Gol Masjid Faislabad.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag5HKvvp8jI

LAHORE: Pakistan Ulema Council Chairman Hafiz Muhammad Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi has challenged Zaid Hamid to hold a dialogue over allegations he made in a TV programme. In a letter to Zaid Hamid on Tuesday, Ashrafi said that he should talk sensibly and prove his allegations. He said that Zaid should tell the nation about himself and his thoughts about Khatm-e-Nubawwat first. Later, talking to Daily Times, Mahmood Ashrafi said that Zaid was a self-styled paragon of the ultra-right and was using Islam and patriotism as a tool for his ulterior motives. He said that he had no right to label charges against people. He said that he had labelled SAFMA as an extension of the Indian intelligence agency RAW, which was altogether baseless. Recalling the Yusuf Kazab case, Ashrafi said that Zaid had gone to Imtiaz Alam and had asked him to rescue Kazab but Alam had refused to help him. Zaid had also been nominated in Maulana Saeed Jalalpuri murder case, he added. He said that Zaid was now targeting those people who had refused to help him in Kazab case. He said that nobody knew what Zaid was, whether he was a right-winger, the army’s representative, a holy warrior, an intellectual or a saint. staff report REFERENCE: Tahir Ashrafi challenges Zaid Hamid to dialogue Wednesday, September 07, 2011 http://archives.dailytimes.com.pk/national/07-Sep-2011/tahir-ashrafi-challenges-zaid-hamid-to-dialogue

Qur'an on SAFMA & Anti-Pakistan Media War - Operation Green Fog


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZaHAJbcGYs

The targeted attacks on Aalmi Majlis-e-Tahafuza-e-Khatam-e-Naboowat (AMTKN) Chief Mufti Saeed Jalalpuri and leader of banned outfit Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP), Maulana Abdul Ghafoor Nadeem, were aimed at inciting sectarian violence across the city, investigators probing the attacks told The News. Investigators believed that a group of six to 10 men are involved in the attacks, in which AMTKN chief Mufti Saeed Jalalpuri was gunned down on late Thursday night along with three associates, while SSP leader, Maulana Nadeem, was also attacked earlier the same day. Maulana Nadeem survived the attack, but his son, Maviya, perished in the attack while trying to save his father. The investigators asserted that both Mufti Jalalpuri and Maulana Nadeem were targeted because they were active in their respective organisational work. DIG-East Zone Abdul Khaliq Sheikh, when contacted by The News, said that in the case of Mufti Jalalpuri, an FIR has been lodged on the complaint of Hafiz Shabir, Jalalpuri’s relative, at Sachal Police Station. The FIR nominates noted media evangelist Zaid Hamid as a suspect, and claims that some days ago, Hamid had threatened Maulana Jalalpuri over the phone. “We have suspicions that Zaid Hamid may be involved in the murder of Mufti Jalalpuri,” Sheikh said, while pointing to the altercation that occurred between the two men. Sources meanwhile told The News that two official investigation teams were subsequently formed by the Sindh police, one led by Senior Superintendent Police (SSP)-Investigation Niaz Ahmed Khosa, while the other was headed by Special Investigation Unit (SIU) Chief SSP Raja Umar Khattab to probe the targeted attacks. Moreover, sources said, another Criminal Investigation Department (CID) probe team was also formed, which is functioning under the direct supervision of Additional Inspector General Saud Ahmed Mirza. Senior investigation officers, speaking to The News on condition of anonymity, said that statements of eyewitnesses in both cases, including the injured, have already been recorded. However, no authentication in the attack on Mufti Saeed Jalalpuri has been made as yet. The eyewitnesses in the attempted murder of Maulana Nadeem include a constable of Nazimabad Police Station, who has told the probe teams that he can identify and help making sketches of two suspects who attacked Maulana Nadeem. The constable narrated that the two men, aged between 26 and 30 years, attacked Maulana Nadeem’s convoy, and then escaped towards Golimar. They got trapped in a traffic gridlock, but then resorted to aerial firing to make way for themselves. The weapons used in both attacks were the same and of three kinds, investigators said, which included 9mm pistols. The empties recovered from the scene of crime are also the same, they argued. This has given rise to the reasoning that the assailants in both cases were from the same group. REFERENCE: ‘Attacks on religious leaders aimed at inciting sectarian violence’ Salis bin Perwaiz Saturday, March 13, 2010

 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=27760&Cat=13&dt=3%2F13%2F2010

KARACHI, March 11 Panic gripped the city when a senior cleric of a religious organisation, his son and two associates were gunned down on Thursday night. In another attack earlier in the day, another prominent cleric, Maulana Abdul Ghafoor Nadeem, was wounded and his son was killed. Police said that Mufti Saeed Ahmed Jalalpuri of Aalmi Tahaffuz-i-Khatm-i-Nabuat, his son Huzaifa Jalalpuri and close associates Fakheruz Zaman and Abdul Rehman were returning from Jamia Masjid Khatman-un-Nabi on Metrovill Road in Gulshan-i-Iqbal area when four to five gunmen on motorcycles sprayed their car with bullets. Police found the casing of spent bullets of 9mm pistol at the scene. Gulshan-e-Iqbal SP Javed Meher said the attackers had opened fire from two directions. “The assailants appeared to be waiting at a place for the cleric and ambushed the car when it reached there,” a police officer said. They were taken to Patel Hospital where Mufti Saeed and his son were pronounced dead while their associates died some time later. Tension gripped the area after the incident and unknown people started firing in the air, forcing shops to close. A large number of people and students of a seminary gathered at the hospital. The bodies were later taken to the Aalmi Tahaffuz-i-Khatm-i-Nabuat in Gurumandir. In the morning, Maulana Abdul Ghafoor Nadeem, a central leader of Ahl-i-Sunnat Wal Jamaat (formerly Sipah-i-Sahaba Pakistan), was injured in what appeared to be an assassination attempt in the city`s Nazimabad area. The attack, however, claimed the life of his youngest son. Maulana`s two other sons and a security guard and a driver were injured. Police said that Maulana Nadeem and his two sons, Rashid Nadeem and Zubair Nadeem, were going in their car to the city courts for a hearing of cases registered against them on August 17 last year during disturbances which followed the killing in Khairpur of Maulana Ali Sher Hydari, chief of the defunct Sipah-i-Sahaba. When the car was near Annu Bhai Park, two men on a motorcycle opened fire. Maulana`s younger son Mauvia Nadeem, 25, who was following the car on a motorcycle suffered fatal bullet wounds, Liaquatabad SP Abdul Hameed Khosa told Dawn. The injured were taken to Abbasi Shaheed Hospital. Additional Police Surgeon Dr Liaquat Memon said that one of the injured had been brought dead to the hospital. Maulana Nadeem received two bullets in his right and left hands and one in the abdomen. Mauvia suffered multiple bullet wounds in the head and torso and died on the spot. Maulana Aurengzeb Farooqi, the organisation`s Karachi president, told Dawn that funeral prayers of Mauvia Nadeem would be offered outside the Chief Minister`s House on Friday. REFERENCE: Panic in Karachi after murder of scholar By Our Staff Reporter March 12, 2010 http://www.dawn.com/news/850351/panic-in-karachi-after-murder-of-scholar

Zaid Hamid:Highly nostalgic,emotional,soul shaking Azan on Sahir Lodhi Show 23rd March 2009


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRY6gHgmXyU

The targeted attacks on Aalmi Majlis-e-Tahafuza-e-Khatam-e-Naboowat (AMTKN) Chief Mufti Saeed Jalalpuri and leader of banned outfit Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP), Maulana Abdul Ghafoor Nadeem, were aimed at inciting sectarian violence across the city, investigators probing the attacks told The News. Investigators believed that a group of six to 10 men are involved in the attacks, in which AMTKN chief Mufti Saeed Jalalpuri was gunned down on late Thursday night along with three associates, while SSP leader, Maulana Nadeem, was also attacked earlier the same day. Maulana Nadeem survived the attack, but his son, Maviya, perished in the attack while trying to save his father. The investigators asserted that both Mufti Jalalpuri and Maulana Nadeem were targeted because they were active in their respective organisational work. DIG-East Zone Abdul Khaliq Sheikh, when contacted by The News, said that in the case of Mufti Jalalpuri, an FIR has been lodged on the complaint of Hafiz Shabir, Jalalpuri's relative, at Sachal Police Station. The FIR nominates noted media evangelist Zaid Hamid as a suspect, and claims that some days ago, Hamid had threatened Maulana Jalalpuri over the phone. We have suspicions that Zaid Hamid may be involved in the murder of Mufti Jalalpuri's Sheikh said, while pointing to the altercation that occurred between the two men. Sources meanwhile told The News that two official investigation teams were subsequently formed by the Sindh police, one led by Senior Superintendent Police (SSP)-Investigation Niaz Ahmed Khosa, while the other was headed by Special Investigation Unit (SIU) Chief SSP Raja Umar Khattab to probe the targeted attacks. Moreover, sources said, another Criminal Investigation Department (CID) probe team was also formed, which is functioning under the direct supervision of Additional Inspector General Saud Ahmed Mirza. Senior investigation officers, speaking to The News on condition of anonymity, said that statements of eyewitnesses in both cases, including the injured, have already been recorded. However, no authentication in the attack on Mufti Saeed Jalalpuri has been made as yet. The eyewitnesses in the attempted murder of Maulana Nadeem include a constable of Nazimabad Police Station, who has told the probe teams that he can identify and help making sketches of two suspects who attacked Maulana Nadeem. The constable narrated that the two men, aged between 26 and 30 years, attacked Maulana Nadeem's convoy, and then escaped towards Golimar. They got trapped in a traffic gridlock, but then resorted to aerial firing to make way for themselves. The weapons used in both attacks were the same and of three kinds, investigators said, which included 9mm pistols. The empties recovered from the scene of crime are also the same, they argued. This has given rise to the reasoning that the assailants in both cases were from the same group. REFERENCE: Zaid Hamid nominated in FIR by Mufti Jalalpuri's family By Salis bin Perwaiz Karachi Saturday, March 13, 2010 (The News International) http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=27760&Cat=13&dt=3/13/2010 Attacks on religious leaders aimed at inciting sectarian violence Zaid Hamid nominated in FIR by Mufti Jalalpuri's family http://www.paktribune.com/news/print.php?id=225494

Zardari's Knack For Issuing Ordinances

On Mon, 3/2/09, Hasan Shabbir wrote:

From: Anas Mahmood

وسعت اللہ خان
بی بی سی اردو ڈاٹ کام، اسلام آباد

صدر زرداری کے اس تاریخی جملے سے اور کچھ ہو یا نہ ہو جسٹس محمد منیر ، جسٹس مولوی مشتاق حسین، جسٹس انوارالحق اور جسٹس ارشاد حسن خان کے فیصلے متنازعہ نہیں رہے۔یوں مولوی تمیز الدین اور بیگم نصرت بھٹو کے مقدمے اور ذوالفقار علی بھٹو کے ساتھ جو ہوا وہ عین انصاف تھا۔
تھینک یو پریذیڈنٹ زردادی۔۔۔۔تھینک یو ویری مچ۔۔۔۔


http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/miscellaneous/story/2009/03/090301_baat_say_baat_nj.shtml

====================================

Dear Hasan Sahab,

Karl Heinrich Marx (May 5, 1818 – March 14, 1883) was a German philosopher, political economist, historian, sociologist, humanist, political theorist and revolutionary credited as the founder of communism. [Courtesy: Wikipedia]

Karl Marx had said , "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.

Aziz Narejo A freelance writer currently living in USA. Editor quarterly Sangat. Ex Editor daily The Chronicle, Islamabad.

A very dear and learned friend of mine, Mr Aziz Narejo had commented in August 2008 regarding our current President Mr Asif Ali Khan Zardari

"QUOTE"

I am sure Zardari will make his two predecessors proud with his work. Also if any one thinks that Pakistan has seen its worst or is going through the most terrible crises of its life, should wait until Zardari assumes presidency. As it is said in USA , “you ain’t seen nothing yet”! Good luck to the luckless people in Pakistan.

"UNQUOTE"

Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari

President Asif Ali Zardari on Sunday promulgated an ordinance to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, authorising setting up of mobile courts and appointing district magistrates. [1]

Parliament has become irrelevant because in view of President Zardari knack for Issuing Ordinance [what was the need of General Election 2008 when the country is to be run through Ordinances instead of debate and legislation in the Parliament]. Lest we froget that during General Musharraf Military Regime the National Assembly passed 51 bills/ordinances in five years, compared to 134 ordinances promulgated by the President. Twenty-seven bills were passed without debate, including the first two annual budgets. In a display of parliament’s irrelevance Musharraf issued four ordinances in July, one day before the NA was to meet. [Courtesy Human Rights Commission of Pakistan - the text in bracket above is written by myself and not of HRCP].

General Musharraf’s preference for ruling by presidential decree instead of legislation by parliament led to some Relative Democracy US President George W. Bush said that democracy was a “lot more stable in Pakistan” than in some other countries. “Well,democracy is – it’s a lot more established in Pakistan than someof the other nations I mentioned,”Bush said in Heiligendamm,Germany.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto

When late Zulfikar Ali Bhutto ascended the throne after 1971 election, he appointed Ghous Bux Raisani as Balochistan governor and Hayat Khan Sherpao as NWFP governor. This decision sowed the seeds of misunderstanding between Bhutto and the two ruling parties in both Balochistan and NWFP, which were then governed by National Awami Party (NAP) and Jamiat Ulema Islam (JUI-Mufti Mehmood). [2]

Bhutto attempted reconciliation with these two parties when the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) started the implementation process of the 1973 constitution. An amicable resolution to the matter was eventually reached, as the previously appointed governors were replaced by Ghous Bux Bezenjo in Balochistan and Mufti Mehmood in NWFP. [2]

However, the establishment wasn’t happy with this political reconciliation, and tried to create schisms between Bhutto and NAP-JUI alliance by blaming the Balochistan government for creating problems. A drama was staged in Islamabad in 1973 where a larch cache of arms and ammunition was recovered from the Iraqi Embassy, and it was claimed that weapons were going to be routed to Balochistan to create trouble. [2]

Later on, disturbance broke out in Lasbella and despite repeated request by Balochistan government for sending armed forces to help, it was rejected by the federal government. As a protest, both provincial governments resigned and an army operation was launched in Balochistan. Similarly, when ZA Bhutto had to ban NAP after the Supreme Court’s verdict declaring the party as anti-Pakistan, Bhutto continued to make reconciliatory efforts. [2]

Barrister Ahmed Raza Kasuri [Murderer of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Toady of Military Dictators like General Zia and General Musharraf and now a toady of Asif Ali Zardari son-in-law of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto]

The present scenario evokes shades of similarities with the past, as Ahmed Raza Kasuri is turning out to be the protagonist in creating misunderstandings between President Asif Zardari and Nawaz Sharif. It was Kasuri who lodged an FIR for murder against ZA Bhutto on the advice of establishment, which led to the arrest, and later on hanging of the PPP founder. This time round, Kasuri was the lawyer in the case against Mian Nawaz Sharif in Supreme Court. [2]

References:

1 - Mobile courts to conduct summary trials Monday, March 02, 2009 Ordinance promulgated; district magistrates to be appointed; lawyers smell a rat on timing of ordinance [1]

http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=20666

2 - Is history repeating itself? By Tahir Hassan Khan Sunday, March 01, 2009 Karachi [2]

http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=165133