Saudi Fatwa Against Tableeghi Jamat but Jang Group Promotes Kufr/Shirk/Bida'at.

LONDON: Interior Minister Rehman Malik has said that Tablighi missionary centre in Raiwaind is the breeding ground of extremism and terrorism in Pakistan as the centre has a major role in brainwashing the extremists. Senator Rehman Malik told the audience at the security think-tank International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS) while speaking on the topic of “Countering Extremism in South Asia”.

Rehman Malik said that all the terrorists arrested in Pakistan had three elements in common: they have visited the missionary Tablighi centre in Lahore’s Raiwind; their close family members have taken part in Afghan war of the Soviet era and they have been to one of the more than 25,000 madrassahs which have mushroomed in Pakistan following the USA and Pakistan’s joint war against the Communist USSR. Malik spoke at length about the rise of religious and ethnic extremism in Pakistan and India, nexus of Al-Qaeda, Pakistani Taliben and sectarian groups such as Lashkare-e-jehangvi and Lashkar-e-Jehnagvi from the mainland Pakistan and how Al-Qaeda couldn’t operate in Pakistan without the help of Pakistani originated groups. He said the terrorism inside Pakistan was being financed from outside and named both India and Afghanistan as the sponsors of terrorist mayhem in Pakistan but claimed that relations with Afghanistan had improved a lot in the last few months and that Afghanistan had listened to the concern of Pakistan - and some international friends - and asked Baloch leader Bharmdagh Bugti to leave its soil.“We have signatures. We know that it’s coming from outside because a mullah cannot use laser guided missiles, internet and other sophisticated weapons. There is a support and this support was identified to us during our probe into Bombay blasts. The entire IT work telephonic emails were used from the outside in Afghanistan,” Malik said in reference to the anti-Pakistan elements, especially the Indian factor, were involved in proxy war inside Pakistan. He appealed to the world to help Pakistan in this fight and don’t hurt Pakistan by refusing to acknowledge its role in the war on terror and instead express doubts on Pakistan’s commitment. REFERENCE: Tablighi Jamaat centre breeding ground for extremists, says Malik Murtaza Ali Shah Friday, July 29, 2011 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=7736&Cat=13&dt=7/29/2011 

http://ejang.jang.com.pk/pic.asp?npic=08-01-2011/Karachi/images/03_16.gif

WASHINGTON : Richard Armitage, Daily Times can confirm, did not use the words attributed to him by President Pervez Musharraf in a CBS 60 Minutes interview, namely that unless Pakistan did American bidding, it will be bombed into the “stone age”. However, neither the President of Pakistan, nor Richard Armitage, who has denied using such language, nor President Bush who said he was “taken aback” when he learnt what had been said, is being untruthful. What actually happened was that after his meeting with Richard Armitage, Lt Gen Mahmood Ahmed – who now wears a long, white beard and has reportedly gone Tableeghi – called Gen Musharraf from the Pakistan embassy in Washington. The conversation took place in Urdu and when the president asked him what the bottom line of the American message was, Gen Mahmood replied in Urdu that the Americans were intent on the removal of the Taliban regime and would not let Pakistan stand in their way and if Pakistan did not fall in line and cooperate, “wo hamari eent se eent baja dey gain” or words to that effect. That being so, President Musharraf’s recollection of the conversation with Gen Mahmood, who was then the director general of the ISI, is accurate, only he translated into English what he had been told in Urdu. It is time for Gen Mahmood to go on record and reproduce exactly the words in which he conveyed the Armitage message to Gen Musharraf on that September day five years ago. khalid hasan. REFERENCE:  'Wo eent se eent baja dein gay’, ISI DG told Musharraf Monday, September 25, 2006 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006/09/25/story_25-9-2006_pg1_4

ISLAMABAD: Former ISI chief General Mehmood has simply vanished from the media which is trying hard to get his comments on the Musharraf-Armitage controversy over the wording of the post-9/11 threat hurled at Islamabad by Washington to win its unconditional support for the so-called war on terror. Mehmood, who has already retired from the Army, is settled in Lahore but despite repeated attempts since Saturday last he is not available to offer his comments on the issue on which his statement really matters a lot. Every time the former ISI chief was approached at his Lahore residence telephone number, the home servant-cum-operator, who identified himself as Banaras Khan, gave the ready response, ‘General Saab is out of the city, he will Inshallah call you upon his return.’ On Saturday afternoon when initially contacted, Banaras said Mehmood would be back by the evening. However, later attempts the same evening and again on Monday and Tuesday, showed that Mehmood is still out of the city. Banaras has no answer when asked where exactly has the general gone. He also claims to have no contact number of Mehmood, who Banaras insists, doesn’t carry a cell phone after it was lost recently. President Musharraf in a recent interview with CBS News magazine show “60 Minutes,” charged that after 9/11 the then deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage told the then DG ISI General Mehmood to “be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the Stone Age”. According to a report, Mehmood, who had seen ups and downs with Musharraf in the post Oct 12, 1999 coup, has joined the Tableeghi Jamaat after he was relieved of his post-retirement assignment to head Fauji Fertilizer. Mehmood is amongst those few top generals (all retired now) including General Aziz, General Usmani and General Jamshed Gulzar, who had strongly opposed Musharraf’s siding with America in its attack on Afghanistan. REFERENCE: General Mehmood ‘vanishes’ By Ansar Abbasi The News International http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=3286 Sunday, October 01, 2006, Ramzan 7, 1427 A.H.

 

SAUDI SCHOLARS ISSUED FATWA AGAINST DEOBANDIS

"QUOTE"

Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh (Tablighi Jamat) http://www.fatwa-online.com/deviantgroups/jamaaahattableegh/0010101.htm

Name of group – Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh, also known as Tablighi Jamat

Adherent to group – Tableeghee, also known as Tablighi, or T.J.

The da’wah of the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh is based upon spreading the merits of Islaam to everyone they are able to reach. This entails it’s adherents to give up some of their time to go out and spread and propogate the da’wah keeping well away from political and partisan issues.

It’s members are compelled into going out (khurooj) to give da’wah and mix with the Muslims in their masaajid, houses and businesses and give words of advice and encourage them to come out with them to give da’wah. They advise that no members should get themselves involved in any quarrels with the Muslims or the government.

Foundation and major personalities

- The founder was called Shaykh Muhammad Ilyaas al-Kaandahlawee who was born in Kaandahlah, a village in the region of Sahaaranfoor in India in 1303 A.H. (1887 C.E.) (died 1364 A.H. / 1948 C.E.).

Initially, he sought knowledge in this village, then later travelled to Delhi where he completed his studies at the Madrasah Deoband which is amongst the biggest Hanafee schools in the Indian sub-continent, which was setup in the year 1283 A.H. (1867 C.E.).

He also sought knowledge under the guardianship of his older brother, Shaykh Muhammad Yahya, who was a teacher at the Madrasah Mathaahir al-’Uloom in Sahaaranfoor.

Later, he studied under Shaykh Ashraf ‘Alee Thanwee (1280 A.H. (1863 C.E.) – 1364 A.H. (1943 C.E.)), who was known to them as ((Hakeem al-Ummah)).

Likewise, he also studied under Shaykh Mahmood Hasan (1268 A.H. (1851 C.E.) – 1339 A.H. (1920 C.E.)) who was amongst the major scholars of the Madrasah Deoband and the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh.

As for Shaykh Rasheed Ahmad al-Kankoohee, born in 1829 C.E. (died 1905 C.E.); Shaykh Muhammad Ilyaas actually gave bay’ah (oath of allegiance) to him in 1315 A.H. (1899 C.E.).

He later renewed his bay’ah (oath of allegiance) to Shaykh Khaleel Ahmad as-Sahaaranfooree who was one of the scholars of the Deobandiyyah group.

- Shaykh ‘Abdur-Raheem Shaah ad-Deobandee at-Tableeghee spent alot of time in organising the affaris of the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh along with Muhammad Ilyaas and his son Shaykh Muhammad Yoosuf after him.

- Shaykh Ihtishaam al-Hasan al-Kaandahlawee married the sister of Muhammad Ilyaas, and spent a long time commanding the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh whilst in the companionship of Shaykh Muhammad Ilyaas, its founder.

Thoughts and beliefs

The founder stipulated six maxims which he established as the fundamentals of his da’wah, with all members taking care to memorise them and propogate them in their da’wah efforts:

1) al-Kalimah at-Tayyibah (declaration of faith – ((Laa ilaaha il-Allaah Muhammad Rasool-Allaah))) ;

2) al-Khushoo’ fis-salaah (offering prayers with full concentration);

3) al-’Ilm wadh-Dhikr (knowledge and remembrance);

4) Ikraam al-Muslimeen (honouring the Muslims);

5) al-Ikhlaas (sincerity);

6) al-Khurooj fee sabeel-Allaah (going out in the path of Allaah).

Their manner of propogating their da’wah is as follows:

A group from amongst them is designated to go to a particular area/town/country, whereby each member of the goup takes with them basic means upon which to sleep and other basic items which shall suffice.

When they arrive at their destination, they organise themselves in a manner whereby some of them begin cleaning the place where they shall be resting during their stay in the area; Whilst others amongst them will go out to the market places and the like remembering Allaah and calling the people to listen to their talk (bayaan – as they call it).

When the time for the bayaan arrives, they all gather together to listen to it. And after the bayaan has finished, they request members of the gathering to come out with them in the path of Allaah. And after Salaat al-Fajr, they divide the group of people who are present into groups where a group leader is appointed for each group. Then the group leader undertakes the responsibility of teaching his group members Soorah al-Faatihah and other small Soorah’s of the Qur.aan. They continue in this way day in day out.

Before their period of stay is over, they encourage the people of the area to come out with them to spread their da’wah, such that some people volunteer to join them for three days or a week or a month. Each one according to his ability and circumstances, their giving up their time in accordance with the saying of Allaah:

{You are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind}, [Soorah Aal-'Imraan, Aayah 110].

And the preferred time for going out is a day in a week, and three days in a month and 40 days in a year and 4 months in a lifetime.

- They refuse invitations to attend social functions made by the people of the area they have settled in for their period of da’wah; their intention being not to busy themselves with anything other than issues of da’wah and remembrance, and that their actions are soley for the sake of Allaah.

- They do not interfere in issues of forbidding the evil, believing they are at the stage of establishing an appropriate climate for Islaamic living, and that if they were to involve themselves in such issues, then this would place obstacles in their way and turn the people away from their da’wah.

- They believe that if they correct their individuals (members) one-by-one then the evil will be automatically eradicated from amongst the masses.

- That going out and propogating their da’wah da’wah to the people helps in nurturing the da’ee and cultivating his actions, such that he feels he is an example for others to follow and that he adheres to that which he is calling the people to.

- They believe that blind following a madhhab is obligatory, and they do not permit ijtihaad, believing that the conditions of a mujtahid (one who is qualified to make ijtihaad) are not present amongst the scholars of this time.

- They have been affected by the ways of the Soofiyyah, whose da’wah is widespread in the Indian sub-continent. For example:

- It is imperative for every member of the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh to have a Shaykh to whom he makes bay’ah (oath of allegiance) to, and whoever was to die whilst not having made bay’ah, then he has died the death of those in pre-Islaam. And often is the case that the bay’ah takes place in a public gathering so as to encourage all present to do likewise and give them all an impression that they are all in this together as one group. And the same is done amongst the women also.

- Excessive love and respect is shown to the Shaykh to whom bay’ah has been given, as is excessive love shown to the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam), that which often takes them out of the fold of displaying appropriate respect to the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam).

- Their belief that the way of the Soofiyyah is the closest way to taste the sweetness of eemaan in the heart.

- Their being taught the names of the major personalities of the Soofiyyah such as ‘Abdul-Qaadir al-Jeelaanee, who was born in Jeelaan in 470 A.H., and also as-Sahrooree, and Abu Mansoor al-Maatureedee who died in 332 A.H., and Jalaal ad-Deen ar-Roomee who was born in 604 A.H., who wrote the book al-Mathnawee.

- They have been affected by the way of the Soofiyyah, in particular the Chishtiyyah, the Qaadiriyyah, the Naqshbandiyyah and the Sahroordiyyah in India.

- There are some members who claim to have adopted the thoughts of the Jamaa’ah an-Noor of Turkey.

- Their da’wah is based upon the arousal of interest and intimidation combined, and thereby causing emotive and affective feelings. They have, thereby managed to enlist in the name of eemaan, many who have immersed themselves into sins and desires, and have directed them to worship and remembrance.

- They do not speak about political issues, and discourage their members from getting involved in these problematic issues, criticising those who do get involved. They say that politics is to leave politics.

- They misinterpret the ahaadeeth pertaining to jihaad, claiming it means to go out and give da’wah, this being to such an extent that their members quite possibly have forgotten about the real meaning of jihaad in the path of Allaah.

- They are very lenient when it comes to narrating weak ahaadeeth.

- Their main points of reference appear to be the Qur.aan and the Sunnah, however, in terms of ‘aqeedah, they turn to the understandings of their founding Shaykhs of the Indian sub-continent, and that being the ‘aqeedah of the Maatureediyyah upon the Hanafee madhhab.

- In the Arab lands they make a point of referring to Imaam an-Nawawee’s Riyaadh as-Saaliheen, whereas in non-Arab lands they refer to the Tableeghee Nisaab (Tablighi Nisab) and Hayaah as-Sahaabah (Hayat Al-Sahabah), and this being full of incorrect information and weak ahaadeeth.

Their da’wah began in India, and then spread to Pakistan and Bangladesh, then later spreading to the rest of the Islaamic world, even in Arabia – such that they now have followers in Syria, Jordan, Palestine, Lebanon, Egypt, Sudan, Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

They also have followers in Europe, America, Asia and Africa. Their worldwide headquarters is in Nizaamuddeen in Delhi, where they administer their da’wah affairs worldwide. Their headquarters in the western world is in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, UK.

Further reading

al-Mawsoo’ah al-Harakiyyah – Fat.hee Yakun;

Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh, aqeedatuhaa wa afkaar mashaayikhihaa – Mian Muhammad Aslam al-Pakistaanee (research paper submitted to the Faculty of Sharee’ah at the Islaamic University of Madeenah in 1976 C.E.);

at-Tareeq ilaa Jamaa’ah al-Muslimeen – Husayn ibn Muhsin ibn ‘Alee ibn Jaabir;

Mushkilaat ad-Da’wah wad-Daa’iyah – Fat.hee Yakun;

as-SIraaj al-Muneer – Dr. Taqqee ad-Deen al-Hilaalee;

ad-Da’wah al-Islaamiyyah fareedah Shar’iyyah wa daroorah bashariyyah – Dr. Saadiq Ameen; Haqeeqatud-Da’wah ilaa Allaah Ta’aala wa maa ikhtassat bihi Jazeeratul-’Arab – Sa’d ibn ‘Abdur-Rahmaan al-Husayn (introduction by Shaykh Saalih ibn Fowzaan);

Ra.yu aakhar fee Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh – Sa’d al-Husayn.

Fatwa of the Shaykh Muhammed Naasiruddeen al-Albaanee regarding the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh http://www.fatwa-online.com/fataawa/creed/deviants/0010326_5.htm 

Question: What is your opinion concerning the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh? Is it permissible for a student of knowledge or other than him to go out with them under the guise of inviting to (the path of) Allaah?

Response: The Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh does not uphold the manhaj of the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and that which our Pious Predecessors were upon.

And if the situation was such, then it is not permissible to go out with them because it defies our manhaj in calling to the manhaj of the Pious Predecessors. So in the path of inviting to Allaah, then an ‘aalim can go out with them but as for those (ignorant – without knowledge) who go out with them, then it is obligatory upon them to remain in their countries and (study Islaam) seek knowledge in their masaajid until there graduates from amongst them people of knowledge who hold study circles inviting to the path of Allaah.

As long as the situation is like that, it is upon the student of knowledge to invite these people (those from Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh) to study the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah and invite people to it.

And the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh, with respect to da’wah to the Book and the Sunnah, do not intend by it a starting point, rather they consider that to be a divided call (da’wah)/approach; And because of this, they most resemble the Jamaa’ah of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen.

They say their da’wah is based upon the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah, however this is mere idle talk for certainly they have no ‘aqeedah upon which they are united (which unites them) – so you find some are Maatureedee, others are Ash’aree, whilst others are Soofee and even some who have no madhhab (affiliation to any particular ideology).

This is because their da’wah is built upon amassing (the people), then gathering together and culturising/instructing them, and in reality they do not really have any culture. More than half a century has passed and there has not appeared from amongst them a scholar.

As for us, then we say instruct them, then gather together, such that the gathering together is based upon a foundation in which there is no doubt. So the da’wah of the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh is that of the Soofiyyah, they call to good manners, as for correcting the differing ‘aqeedah of the group, then they do not exert themselves one iota. This is because they believe this will cause differences (and splitting apart).

It came to pass that a brother, Sa’d al-Husayn had much correspondence with the leader of the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh in India or Pakistan and it became clear from that they acknowledge (belief in) intercession and seeking help (from other than Allaah) and many other such things. And they require their people (members) to make bay’ah (oath of allegiance) based upon four issues: amongst them the Naqshbandiyyah methodology. So it is upon every tableeghee (one who ascribes to the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh) to make bay’ah of these fundamentals (issues).

A questioner may ask: Indeed this group has corrected its faults (returned to Allaah) as a result of the efforts of many individuals and quite possibly many non-Muslims have accepted Islaam at their hands. Is this not sufficient (proof) for the permissibilty of going out with them and participating in that which they call to?

So we say: Indeed we know these words and hear them a lot and know them to emanate from the Soofiyyah! For example, there is a Shaykh whose ‘aqeedah is incorrect and does not know anything about the Sunnah. Instead they deceitfully take from the wealth of the people, so together with this, many open sinners seek forgiveness from them!

So every group which invites to good, then it is imperative they should be in adherence (to the Qur.aan and the Sunnah), and (this) our approach is pure, so what are they (others) calling to?

Are they calling to adherence to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and the ;aqeedah of the Pious Predecessors, abandoning blind following of the madhhabs to such an extent that they adhere to the Sunnah over and above their madhhab!? So the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh do not have a knowledge-based (manhaj), rather, their manhaj is according to the place where they are to be found, so they change their “colours” to suit themselves.

The Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh and the Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen are amongst the 72 sects http://www.fatwa-online.com/fataawa/creed/deviants/0010326_2.htm

Question: May Allaah grant you the best (of His favours). In the hadeeth of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam), relating to the splitting of the Ummah, he says:

((…and my Ummah shall split into 73 sects…)).

So, is the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh, with what they have in terms of shirk and innovations; and also the Jamaa’ah al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen, with what they have in terms of partisanship and revolting/rebelling against the leaders and lack of obedience; from the 72 sects?

Response: They are from the 72 (sects). Whoever opposes the ‘aqeedah of Ahlus-Sunnah enters the fold of the 72 (sects). The meaning of the Prophet’s (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) statement ((My Ummah)) is: the Ummah of Ijaabah, i.e. the Ummah of response; those who responded to the Prophet’s call and revealed their allegiance to him. And the meaning of 73 sects: the victorious sect which adhered to him and was upright in their religion and 72 of those sects – amongst them the kuffaar, the sinners and various innovators.

So, the questioners asked: Are these two groups (Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh and Jamaa’ah al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen) from amongst the 72 sects?

And the Shaykh responded: Yes, they are from the amongst the 72 sects, along with the Murji’ah and other than them; the Murji’ah and the Khawaarij – some of the people of knowledge regard the Khawaarij from amongst the kuffaar, out of the fold of Islaam although amongst the 72 sects.

Taken from the recording of the Shaykh Ibn Baaz’s lessons in Sharh al-Muntaqaa in Ta’if approximately 2 years or less before his death.

Fatwa of Shaykh ‘Abdul-’Azeez ibn Baaz regarding the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh http://www.fatwa-online.com/fataawa/creed/deviants/0010326_3.htm

Question: I went out with the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh to India and Pakistan. We used to congregate and pray in masaajid within which there were graves and I heard that the salaah in a masjid within which there is a grave is invalid. What is your opinion of my salaah and should I repeat them? What is the ruling about going out with them to these places?

Response: Indeed, the Jamaa’ah at-Tableegh do not have real knowledge pertaining to issues of ‘aqeedah so it is not permissible to go out with them except for the one who has real knowledge of the correct ‘aqeedah of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah. In this, he can enlighten them, advise them and co-operate with them in good because they are active in their affairs. However, they are in need of more knowledge from those who can enlighten them amongst the scholars of Tawheed and Sunnah. May Allaah grant everyone understanding of the religion and firmness upon it.

As for the salaah in the masaajid within which are graves, then it is incorrect and it is obligatory upon you to repeat all that you did (in those masaajid) due to that which the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) said:

((Allaah has cursed the Jews and the Christians who have taken the graves of their Prophets’ as places of worship)) – it’s authenticity is agreed upon.

Also, his (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) statement:

((Indeed those before you used to take the graves of their Prophets’ and pious people as places of worship, so do not take the graves as places of worship, for certainly I prohibit you from that)), transmitted by Muslim in his Saheeh. And the ahaadeeth on this subject are numerous – and with Allaah lies all success and may Allaah send prayers upon our Prophet Muhammed, his family and his companions.

Fatwa dated 2/11/1414 A.H.

Tablighi Jamaat - Teachings of Shirk in the book - Fazail Amaal

"UNQUOTE"

References: http://www.sahihmuslim.com/sps/downloads/pdf/GRV020004.pdf
http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/downloads/pdf/GRV020006.pdf
http://www.spubs.com/SPS/sp.cfm?subsecID=GRV02&articleID=GRV020005&articlePages=1

http://ejang.jang.com.pk/pic.asp?npic=08-01-2011/Karachi/images/06_04.gif

When I see the greed of our rulers who speed around in bullet-proof cars with large security entourages under the illusion that nothing will happen to them, I remember a story narrated by the famous waliullah Fariduddin Attar (RA). Once a ruler (or king) built a grand, expensive palace. Its pillars were covered with gold leaf, costly Persian carpets covered the floors and it had beautiful gold-plated furniture and chandeliers. He invited many rulers from nearby countries, hosted a grand reception and asked his guests for their opinion about his palace and whether they could find any fault with it. All the guests were full of praise for the palace, saying that they had never seen one like it before and probably no one would see another like it in the future. However, a Sufi remarked that there was indeed a defect, a very fine crack in the wall. The ruler became annoyed and thundered that there was no crack anywhere. The Sufi said that there was indeed a crack in the wall through which Hazrat Izrael, the Angel of Death, would come to take the ruler’s life when his time came and the ruler would not be able to stop him. All this wealth and grandeur will be of no avail, he told the ruler. Within a few years you will be a handful of dust. I was talking of that crack, so please do not rely on the grandeur and strength of something temporary, as nothing can turn a temporary thing into a permanent thing. Do not pin your hopes on it and be haughty in your behaviour. If a person does not express his views honestly to the ruler, it is definitely a misfortune for both of them. In the light of the above, my request and advice to the rulers is to learn from it and remember that all this greed and effort to amass wealth and property will be of no avail. After some time they will be taken care of by Hazrat Izrael and then they will be just a handful of dust after a short time, just like their ancestors. REFERENCE: Dirty politics, failed government Dr A Q Khan Monday, August 01, 2011 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=60573&Cat=9&dt=8/1/2011 

SAUDI (Muslim) FATWA AGAINST THE SCHOLARS (Muslim) OF DEOBAND  AND DEOBANDIS (Muslim) - The Necessity For the Imaam To Have Correct Aqeedah Author: Shaikh Badee ud-Deen Shah as-Sindee (Pir Jhanda of Pakistan) Glimpses of some of the beliefs and practices of the Deobandite Hanafis which are not free from great deviations in Aqeedah, Tawheed and Manhaj. An excellent article. http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/downloads/pdf/GRV120001.pdf

Nawaz Sharif and Lt. General (Retd) Javed Nasir.

Mubashir Inayet wrote:

People get fed up with fighting that has zero reults and Nawaz Sharif was perhaps trying to turn a new chapter by inviting Vajpayee for peace talks. No matter how bad the enemy is since when initiating a peace dialog become a crime. Nations do it all the time with worst of their enemies? Nawaz Sharif is no angel, but we need some sanity and honesty here folks!!

Mubashir
===================================

Another Blast from the Past on Nawaz Sharif [Twice Elected Prime Minister of Pakistan]

Discussing these issues are called Treason in Pakistan so let me cast the first stone.

Even the silliest amongst the Intelligence Officers/Psychological War Experts never discuss their Operations, they don’t even have dream about their Operations [only on need to know basis] but since ours have been suffering from acute fever of bragging they make it a part of public record. Any sane officer wont allow an agent who is involved in across the border insurgency, in opening their head office anywhere in Pakistan but this has happened in our Land of Pure from 1988 till 9/11. We actually prepared a Case of Terrorism against the Government of Pakistan with our own hands in doing such foolish things. How would you justify Maulana Masood Azher [Jaish-e-Muhammad], Hafiz Muhammad Saeed [Lashkar-e-Tayyaba] and other such MAFIA ROGUES riding in double cabins totting RPGs, Klashnikovs.etc so openly in the streets of Pakistani Cities and not only that they used to hold press conferences in Press Clubs in the supervision of such armed guards behaving like Latin American Cali and Gacha Cartels. Whereas political forces were not even allowed to hold a public rallies. Who was supporting them after 12 October 1999? Such braggarts be tried for the violation of Secret Service Act for making such suicidal policies and then making it public which has made people and this country’s existence in doldrums. One such example of bragging by Javed Nasir:

Lt. General (Retd) Javed Nasir

Lt.Gen. (retd) Javed Nasir, who was the Director-General of the ISI during Mr.Nawaz Sharif's first tenure [1990-1993] as the Prime Minister and who was sacked by Mr.Sharif along with many other ISI officers in the first half of 1993 on the demand of the US because of his involvement in the training of foreign terrorist groups and his non-cooperation with the CIA in buying back the unused Stinger missiles from the Afghan Mujahideen. He was appointed by Mr.Sharif, in his second term, as his Intelligence Adviser and, concurrently, as the President of the Pakistan Gurudwara Prabandak Committee (PGPC), which manages the gurudwaras, the Sikh places of worship in Pakistan, thereby breaking with the tradition of always appointing a Sikh religious leader as its President. In the last months of Mr.Sharif's regime, he removed Lt.Gen.Nasir as his Intelligence Adviser because of his public criticism of the withdrawal of the Pakistani troops from Indian Territory in the Kargil area. However, Lt.Gen.Nasir continues to be one of the trusted unofficial advisers of Gen.Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's Chief Executive, and Lt.Gen.Mohammad Aziz, till now the Chief of the General Staff (CGS), who is very close to the Islamic extremist organisations and is generally known in Pakistan as the Mullahs'General. Lt. Gen. Syed Mohammad Amjad, the Chairman of the Accountability Bureau, had started an investigation not only against a former Chief of the Naval Staff, who was removed from office by Mr.Sharif on charges of corruption and who has since taken shelter in the US, but also into the cases of the unpaid bank loans of Lt.Gen.Nasir, the close friend of Gen.Musharraf, and his alleged involvement in the smuggling of heroin. Annoyed by this, Gen. Musharraf has removed Lt.Gen.Amjad from his post and sent him to Multan as the Corps Commander. Lt.Gen.Khalid Maqbool, who has now been appointed as the Chairman of the Accountability Bureau, is also a close personal friend of Lt.Gen.Nasir. Lt.Gen.Maqbool is a Punjabi belonging to the Baloch regiment. He was GOC 4 Corps till his transfer to the Accountability Bureau. He is one of the Noriegas of the Pakistan Army.

He was all praise for Former COAS Mirza Aslam Baig of him being a professional soldier and not imposing Martial Law after the death of Zia in 1988. How would Javed Nasir Sahib justify General Baig’s alleged involvement in behind the scene Political Maneuvering to corrupt the political system of this country in the name of Strategic Depths? How would he justify the role General Baig played in a No-Confidence Movement against the first Benazir Bhutto Government during 1989 when he himself ‘arranged’ the crucial 14 MQM votes against the first PPP government when PPP and MQM were in treaty, above all who made the situation unbearable in Sindh for PPP? How would he justify the Mehran Bank Scandal? Was that scandal in any way professional?

Everybody knows how the newspapers publish denials after they publish something damaging and that too if it is against any Army Officer. As per news reports that Mr. Javed Nasir [in capacity former chairman of the Evacuee Trust Property Board (ETPB)] was involved in the bungling of Rs 3 billion through sale of precious ETPB lands at rock bottom prices and financial bungling in the board's buildings in Islamabad. The ex-chairman relinquished his charge on July 16, 2001, as he was not accorded extension in service. Since then, files containing record of his corruption have been rotting in the cupboards of the ministry of religious affairs and NAB. The grand sleaze started during Gen Zia ul Haq's time when its corrupt managers were allowed to sell the properties and even give away to his favorites in charity. Lt Gen (retd) Khawaja Javed Nasir of Engineering Corps, who was a friend of Mian Mohammad Sharif, father of former prime minister Mr Nawaz Sharif and former chief minister Mr Shahbaz Sharif, was appointed Chairman, ETPB. The later rendered expert services to Sharif family, one of which was conversion of Rs 4 billion under a Trust known as Sharif Medical and Educational Complex, (now) Jati Umra (Raiwind).

The ISI role in Bosnia, Afghanistan and in keeping Sikh militancy alive has now been brought to public notice by no less a person than the former chief of the ISI, Lt. Gen. Javed Nasir (Retd), who has boasted of these "achievements" in a petition filed by him before a Lahore Terrorist Court seeking the death sentence for four top journalists responsible for a report accusing him of embezzling Pakistani Rs 3 billion. Lt. Gen. Nasir has confirmed, perhaps for the first time before the Pakistani courts, the ISI role in Afghanistan, Bosnia and in Punjab. He has touched on just some incidents that might have been rightly or wrongly projected to highlight his achievements as the chief of the ISI, but in the process he has ensu-red that the role of Pakistan's intelligence agency in neighbouring countries, including India, have been placed on the record. Lt. Gen. Nasir, in the petition that has been published by the South Asia Tribune, has claimed that the ISI under him decided to curb the "free hand" acquired by RAW since 1948 in the "manipulation and control of Sikh yatris" travelling to Pakistan to attend religious functions. He said he had set up the Pakistan Sikh Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee to wrest control from the Indian intelligence agency and had succeeded in gaining control over the management of the festivals within a year for the first time. The former ISI chief, in his petition, has claimed that this matter had so incensed the Indian government that Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee had been moved to raise the issue with then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in their one-on-one meeting during the famous Lahore yatra. He said the Punjab chief minister had accompanied Mr Vajpayee and that eventually the Pakistan government ensured that the Indian plan to regain control was "aborted." Interestingly, Lt. Gen. Nasir has cited this to substantiate a claim that RAW, along with the CIA, was behind the effort to discredit him through the newspaper.

The intention, he insisted, was to discredit him and tarnish and destroy his image as a "Sikh Friendly (sic) next to Guru status that the Sikhs had started giving him" in Pakistan. He said he had set up the Pakistan Sikh Committee during his first year as chairman of the Evacuee Trust Property Board. Lt. Gen. Nasir, moved by the newspaper allegations to establish his credentials as an "efficient" officer, has also disclosed that Pakistan defied a United Nations ban on the supply of arms to Bosnian Muslims and airlifted sophisticated anti-tank guided missiles to help the Bosnians fight the Serbs. "Despite the UN ban on supply of arms to the besieged Bosnians, he successfully airlifted sophisticated anti-tank guided missiles which turned the tide in favour of Bosnian Muslims and forced the Serbs to lift the siege, much to the annoyance of the US government," the petition extolling the general states. "He thus became the target of US, Indian and secular minded lobbies both inside and outside Pakistan. Having failed to buy him, the US government started a fabricated and mendaciously false propaganda against him and demanded his removal as ISI chief, failing which Pakistan would be declared a terrorist state," the petition stated. It went on to claim that in April 1993 the US threatened to declare Pakistan a terrorist state unless Lt. Gen. Nasir was removed. "It was therefore at the behest of the US government's official demand that he was prematurely compulsorily retired from service by the caretaker government of Mir Balkh Sher Mazari on 13 May, 1993," it added. Lt. Gen. Nasir was the ISI chief from March 1992 till May 1993. He was re-accommodated later by Gen. Pervez Musharraf but the wording of the petition filed against the Jang/News group journalists reveals a mind that does not appear to be particularly stable. He has listed a series of "achievements" that appear to come in the realm of Pakistan state secrets although, interestingly, this trial has remained largely out of the local media.

For instance, he has also taken credit for putting together a mujahideen government in Kabul in the April of 1992 after the ouster of the Soviet-backed Najibullah government. "On March 14, 1992, I was appointed as DG, ISI, and became an instant international figure when in April 1992 (and here the I becomes he), through his persuasive power and motivational talks he brought all the warring factions of the Afghan Mujahideen to agree to the famous Peshawar accord and successfully installed the Mujahideen's first government under (President) Mujadadi in Kabul," the petition states. The former ISI chief has also spoken at length in the petition of his close links with the Tablighi Jamaat. Describing him as an active member of the Jamaat, the petition goes on to insist that the "target is the non-militant non-violent Tablighi Jamaat, which stands for unification of all sects all over the world. By weakening it sectarianism will be strengthened indirectly."

The petition seeks to point out that the reports casting doubts on the integrity of Lt. Gen. Nasir were basically aimed at promoting sectarian violence by attacking the Jamaat. This is a highly conservative organisation seeking a purist theocratic state with no rights for women and no room for secular and liberal thought. In fact, Lt. Gen. Nasir's petition refers frequently to the Tablighi Jamaat, endorsing his status as an active member committed to promoting and preaching Islam. Hence the attack on him from all outside the pale, including the US, RAW and the secularists.

Reference:

1- South Asia Analysis Group Papers

PAKISTAN'S NORIEGAS: An open letter to US Congressmens

http://www.saag.org/papers2/paper143.html

2- Agenciyon Ki Hukoomat by Late. Azher Sohail.

3- Ex-ETPB chief flees country with Rs 3bn in pocket

http://www.paknews.org/php/flash.php?id=24&date1=2002-08-23

4- ISI brags about role in Punjab, Bosnia Author: Seema Mustafa Publication: The Asian Age Date: December 27, 2002.

http://www.hvk.org/hvk/articles/0103/34.html

for further reading:

P. R. Kumaraswamy Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies (JCSS)

http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/memoranda/memo55.pdf

new left review 19 jan feb 2003 5 tariq ali THE COLOUR KHAKI

Now each day is fair and balmy, Everywhere you look: the army. Ustad Daman (1959)

http://www.newleftreview.net/NLR25301.shtml

Memories of Barbarity: Sharonism and September By Vijay Prashad April 9, 2002 in COUNTERPUNCH. Viijay Prashad teaches political science and international studies at Trinity College. He is the author of Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting: Afro-Asian Connections and the Myth of Cultural Purity and The Karma of Brown Folk. Prashad can be reached at: Vijay.Prashad@trincoll.edu

Barelvis and Deobandi Tableeghi Jamaat - 3

Sultan Shahin wrote:

TABLEEGHI JAMAAT - IMPLICATIONS OF THE WORDS OF THE HOLY PROPHET (SALLALLAHU ALAYHI WASALLAM)

Maulvi Husain Ahmad Sahib, the Founder Patron of the ‘Tableeghi Jamaat’ describes the appearance of Mohammed bin Abdul Wahab as follows:

by Maulana Arshadul Qadri

http://newageislam.com/ArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=901

======================================================

Dear Sultan Sahab,

Reply Number 3 C: Barelvi and Deobandi Tableeghi Jamaat

"QUOTE"


Jamaa'ah at-Tableegh: Teachings of Shirk in the book -"Fadhaa.il A'maal" - Part 3

Tableeghi Jamaat: Teachings of Shirk in the Book -"Fadhaa.il A'maal" (popularly referred to as - " Fazail Amal")

Part 3: Readings in "Fadhaa.il Hajj" (virtues of hajj)

Editors Introduction

All praise is due to Allaah. We praise Him, seek His help and forgiveness. And we seek refuge in Allaah the Most High from the evils of our own selves and from our bad deeds. Whomsoever Allaah guides none can misguide him and whomsoever Allaah misguides there is none to guide such an individual. I bear witness that there is no true god worthy of being worshipped except Allaah alone, without partner or associate. I further bear witness that Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) is His slave and Messenger. May Allaah the Exalted bestow his peace and blessings on the final messenger Muhammad, upon his family, his noble companions and all those who follow them.

To Proceed:

That the most truthful speech is the Qur'aan, the word of Allaah and the best of guidance is that of Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam). And the worst of affairs in this religion of ours are the innovations and every innovation is a bid`ah and every bid`ah is misguidance and every misguidance is in the hell fire.

Alhamdulillah, this is the third paper in the series of exposing the teachings of Shirk and bid`ah in the book Fadha'il 'A'maal (also known as Tableeghi Nisaab). I would like to remind my brothers and sisters that the intent of these papers is not to curse anyone.The author of Fadhaíl A'maal is dead and his affair is with Allaah the Mighty and Majestic. The real intent of this research is to warn all Muslims of the deviations in 'Aqeedah, Ibaadah, Manhaj that have crept into the Ummah of Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) through fabricated narrations and false stories of auliya which unfortunately forms nearly 80% of Fadha'il 'A'maal. It is to warn and call the Muslims at the same time to leave bigoted partisanship, to correct their 'Aqeedah and to hold on to the clear path that the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) left us upon. Anything else is total destruction in this world and in the hereafter.

Verily Allaah the Most High has said in the Qur.aan (meaning of which):

{And whoever contradicts and opposes the Messenger (Muhammad) after the right path has been shown clearly to him, and follows other than the believers' way. We shall keep him in the path he has chosen, and burn him in Hell - what an evil destination}, [Soorah An-Nisa., Aayah 115]

In this paper we will concentrate of Fadha'il Hajj (virtues of Hajj). This is the final chapter in Volume II of Fadha'il 'A'maal. It also contains the most awful and horrendous teachings of major shirk. Any reader will be shocked to read the narrations that the author, Muhammad Zakaria Kandalvi has brought out which are nothing but plain Hinduism, Qadianism and paganism and we seek refuge in Allaah the Most High. The great Shaikh al Hadith, the so called knower of Allaah and pivot of the world goes at length on explaining the virtues of sticking to the Sunnah but he himself failed to practice to what he preached!

And unfortunately Kandalvi has combined all the major deviations that have struck this Ummah in his book. From distorting the meanings of the attributes of Allaah to preaching major shirk and innovations in its worst forms, Fadha'il 'A'maal without doubt is the most false, fabricated and "shirk story book" of our times.

Why did not Zakaria Kandalvi stop where our Pious Predecessors stopped? Why were the narrations not sufficient for him when they were sufficient for the first generation? Why did not the "Shaikh al-Hadith of Deobandh" refer to the authemtic narrations in Bukhaaree, Muslim and other collections of ahadith? Why in the name of love and Ibaadah the tenets of Sufism and Hinduism are being propagated? Why is the 'Aqeedah of the Rafidee Sh'ia being smuggled under the guise of Sunnah? And why is shirk taught and Tawheed suppressed? We seek an answer from our brothers who are involved in Jamaa'at ut-Tableegh. "Shaikh al-Hadith" Kandalvi Sahib himself says, "…it is important to note that whenever I quoted a 'hadit' without mentioning the name of the book, it should be deemed to have been taken from one of the five books, viz., 'Al-Mishkat', …'Sharah Ihya al-Ulum'

Ihya ulum ad-Deen? He could not find a better collection? Why are not Saheeh al-Bukhaaree, Saheeh Muslim or any other sound collection of narrations were chose by the Muhaddith?

It will be beneficial to know what the scholars have said about this book over the years:

AT-TURTOOSHEE (d.520H)

He said in writing to 'Abdullaah Ibnul-Mudhaffar about al-Ghazzaalee:

"When he wrote his book, he called it Ihyaa 'Uloomud-Deen, and talked about the sciences of the states of things and ways of the Soofees in it, but he was neither well acquainted with them nor well-informed about them, so he fell headlong, and thus did not fall either among the scholars of the Muslims or within the conditions of the Soofee ascetics.

He filled his book with lies upon the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam), and I do not know of any book upon the surface of the earth which attributes more lies to the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) than this one! He molded it with the opinions of the philosophers and concepts held in the Rasaa'il Ikhwaanis-Suffaa. They (the Ikhwaanus-Suffaa) are a people who regard Prophethood as a level that can be acquired, and the Prophet is in their view no more than a noble person with excellent character who avoided what is ignoble and took hold of his own soul until he had it under control so that no desire overcame it, nor bad manners overtook it, then he took control of nature with those manners."

AL-MAAZAREE (d.536H)

Al-Haafidh adh-Dhahabee says in Siyar A'laamun-Nubalaa (19/340) ...and Imaam Muhammad Ibn 'Alee al-Maazaree as-Saqilee speaks about al-Ihyaa in a way that shows his prominence as an lmaam. He says:

'There have been repeated requests to know our position regarding the book called Ihyaa 'Uloom ud-Deen and I said that the opinions of people differ about it. A group seeks to publicise it and stick blindly to that, a group warns the people against it and causes them to flee from it, and a group who burn it.

The people of the East have also written to me, asking about it, and I have not previously read except parts of it. So if Allaah extends my life, I shall spend time upon it and remove the confusion the peoples hearts. Know that I have seen the students of it, and all of them relate to me a part of its condition which take the place of seeing with ones own eyes, so I will briefly mention his condition and that of his book, and some of the positions of the people of Tawheed and of the Soofees, and the people of allusions and philosophy, since his book wavers between all of those!"

AL-QAADEE 'IYAAD (d.544H)

He said:

"And Shaykh Aboo Haamid (al-Ghazzaalee) possesses -repugnant information and in producing shocking works he went beyond bounds in the way of Soofism, and devoted himself to supporting them, and became a caller to that, and wrote well-known books on that (He refers to al-Ihyaa as is shown by what comes after).

He was reproached for parts of that and the minds of the Ummah came to have a low opinion of him. Allaah knows that which is hidden about him, and here in the West the order of the Sultaan (ruler) and the ruling of the scholars is that it should be burnt and kept away from, so that was done..."

IBN AL-JAWZEE (d. 597H)

He says in al-Muntazim (9/169-170):

"He began to write the book al-Ihyaa in al-Quds and finished it in Damascus, however, he wrote it upon the way of the Soofis and did away with the rules of Fiqh in it. For example, regarding effacing of honour and fighting the self, he mentions that a man wished to efface his own honour, so he entered a public bath and put on someone else's clothes, then he put his own clothes on top of them and went out walking slowly so that the people could catch him. So they took them back from him and called him 'The Thief of the Public Baths'.

Mentioning such things as this for followers to learn from is disgusting because it is judged so according to Fiqh. When there is a guardian for public baths and a person steals, his hand is cut off, and it is not permissible for a Muslim to offer an action for which they would be sinful if they did it!

He mentions that a man bought some meat and found that his soul felt shy to carry it to his house, so he tied it round his neck and walked to his house. This is also totally repugnant and there are many similar things for which this is not the place.

I have gathered together the mistakes of the book and called it "A Notification to the Living Regarding the Errors of al-Ihyaa", and I have pointed some of them out in my book Talbees-Iblees!

(Also) what he mentions in the book of marriage that 'Aa'ishah said to the Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam), "You are the one who claims that you are the Messenger of Allaah!"

That is impossible! Verily the reason for his turning away from the requirements of Fiqh in that which he quotes is that he accompanied the Soofis and regarded their condition to be the goal, and he said, "Indeed I have taken the way from Aboo 'Alee al-Farmadhee and I followed what he directed me to as regards daily worships and continual dhikr (remembering Allaah) until I passed those difficulties and became burdened with heavy tasks, and I did not attain that which I sought."

And further, there are many, many other scholars of Ahlus Sunnah who have strongly criticized this books and its likes. But Kandalvi takes from it extensively. Is this not a deviation?

And we call all the Muslims to Islaam. Not the Islaam of a group or any Jamah' or to any personality. But we call you to Islaam where the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) left us. Where the night is like its day. He left us on the straight path but shiataan took us to paths on the left and the right. The shayateen amongst the men and jinn took the Muslims to those crooked path at the head is a bigger devil calling to the fire.

From 'Abdullaah Ibn Mas'ood (radiyallaahu 'anhu) who said:

"The Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) drew a line for us, then he said: "This is the Path of Allaah." Then he drew lines from it's right and it's left, then he said:

((These are scattered lines, upon each of them is a devil calling to it)). Then he read:

{And verily this is My Straight Path, so follow it and do not follow the other paths because they will separate you from His Path}, [Soorah al-An'aam, Aayah 153]" [Related by Nisaa`ee (no. 184) and Ahmad (1/435) and this wording is by him. It is also related by ad-Daarimee (1/67-68) and at-Tabaree in Jaami'ul Bayaan (8/65), it was authenticated by Shaykh Saleem al-Hilaalee in Basaa`ir Dhush-Sharaf (p. 82).]

This is the worst disease that today every Muslim has attached himself to a party or a personality making Taqleed and trading his intellect for no gain. The agenda of the party is placed even above the Sunnah of Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and the word of the leader is final. Anyone opposing it is expelled and ostracized. How can we establish the Sharee'ah of Allaah when we don't even know it. All the groups hate knowledge. They don't call to it and neither do they instruct their followers to seek it. Every group today claims to be working to establish the law of Allaah on earth but each group claims the other to be Jaahil and misguided. How can, in the midst of such multiple parties, groups and sects achieve unity of the Muslims. What is the solution to bringing us into one brotherhood?

Allaah the All Wise has said in the Qur.aan (meaning of which):

{And hold fast altogether to the rope of Allaah and do not be divided.And remember the favour of Allaah upon you, in that you were once enemies to one another, but He joined your hearts together, so that by His Grace you became brothers}, [Soorah Aali-'Imraan, Aayah 103]

{Indeed this Ummah of yours is a single Ummah and I am your Lord, so worship Me alone}, [Soorah al -Anbiyaa., Aayah 92]

{And He has united their (i.e. believers') hearts. If you had spent all that is in the earth, you could not have united their hearts, but Allâh has united them. Certainly He is All-Mighty, All-Wise}, [Soorah Anfal, Aayah 63]

And how is this joining of he hearts to be achieved? What are the means of achieveing this miracle that is possible only with Allaah the Most High? By the example of Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam). And what is said about Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam)?

{He it is Who sent among the unlettered ones a Messenger (Muhammad) from among themselves, reciting to them His Verses, purifying them (from the filth of disbelief and polytheism), and teaching them the Book (this Qur'ân, Islâmic laws and Islâmic jurisprudence) and Al-Hikmah (Sunnah: legal ways, orders, acts of worship, etc. of Prophet Muhammad). And verily, they had been before in mainfest error}, [Soorah Jumu'ah, Aayah 2]

We can only bring the Muslims together through Tasfiya wa Tarbiya (purification and cultivation) If the Sharee'ah of Allaah can join a hundred hardened tribes 1400 hundred years ago and make them into one brotherhood, why can't the same happen today with hundreds of parties? But this education involves exposing the innovators; their figureheads and their books. It is to warn all Muslims of their deviations so that they save themselves and their families from the evil and return to the Jamaa'ah. The Jamaa'ah that the Sahaba were upon and which today is best embodied by those who are on the Manhaj of the Pious Predecessors and all praise be to Allaah the one worthy of praise.

Following the principles of Tasfiya wa Tarbiya, this is a continuing effort inshAllaah to expose the books of Jamaa'at ut-Tableegh headed by Fadha'il 'A'maal. And I hope that it becomes a source of guidance for any Muslim who reads it. And in the footsteps on the noble Imaam, teacher, defender of the Sunnah, al Barbaharee (d.329H) I use his noble statement that the purpose of writing of these papers is "…perhaps Allaah will bring a confused person out of his confusion, or an innovator out of his innovation, or a misguided one out of his misguidance and he may be saved through it."

Reading through Fadha'il Hajj, it is difficult to deicde where to start from? From the Taweel of the Sifat of Allaah? Or open teachings of grave worship? The "above the Prophet" status of the auliya? Lies on the Sahaba? Or worshipping the auliya themselves? But as we read we will have some uniformity inshAllaah in the refutations and not an unorganized mess.

Before we actually dive into Fahdail Amaal let us take heed from the following pure narrations:

Abu Hurayrah (radhi-yallaahu 'anhu) narrates that the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) said:

((It is sufficient to render a man a liar that he narrates everything he hears)), (Reported by Muslim)

And he also narrated from Allaah's Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam):

((There will come at the end of time, Dajjaals, Liars, who will come to you with ahaadeeth that neither yourselves nor your forefathers will have heard of. So beware and beware of them, lest they cause you to go astray and be put to trial)), [Saheeh Muslim and Musnad Ahmad, it is Saheeh]


The Open Sanctioning of Grave Worship in Fahda'il 'A'maal.

Zakaria Kandalvi has presented a cocktail of 'Aqeedah in Fadha'il Hajj. He borrowed from the Ashaira shifting to Raafidah then morphing to Soofiya with traces of Qadiyyaniyah and finally ending with Hinduism! And protecting is sought with Allaah from all these faces of Kufr. Kandalvi starts with making Taweel of the attribute of the descending of Allaah in the manner of the Ash'arees.

He writes on page 15, Fadha'il Hajj, Volume II:



"The issue of Allaah being near or descending or any such type of narrations that are mentioned its knowledge is only with Allaah; He is always near but the apparent meaning that the majority of the scholars have taken is that it is the special mercy of Allaah"

Allaahu Mus'ta'aan! Which scholar from Ahlus Sunnah and upon the Manhaj of the Pious Predecessors said this? This is only with the conformity with the wretched 'Asha'irah that they make figurative interpolations of what they refuse to understand of the Sifat of Allaah the Most High and Blessed. They do not stick to the basic principles regarding the attributes of Allaah and argue about what is forbidden. And why has not the statements of the Pious Predecessors quoted on the issue of the descent of Allaah the Mighty and Majestic? Are they lost in history or did Kandalvi chose not to quote them, bringing out the 'Aqeedah of the wretched Ash'arees?

Those who make ta'weel and attribute meanings to the words of Allaah, that they themselves have devised, then they are lying upon Allaah, as they do not know whether Allaah intended that meaning they devised or not! And the way of the Pious Predecessors was to accept the attributes, with their meanings, but negate their likeness to those of the Creation.

Imaam Abul-Abbaas ibn Suraij known as 'ash-Shaafi'ee the second' and he was a contemporary of Al-Ash'aree, said: "We do not speak with Ta'weel (interpretation) of the Mu'tazilah, the Ash'arees, the Jahmiyyah, the apostates, the anthropomorphists (Mujassimah and Mushabbihah), the Karraamiyyah and those who declare Allaah to be like His creation (Mukayyifah - those asking about the modality of His attributes). Rather we accept them [the texts about Allaah's attributes] without interpretation (Ta'weel) and we believe in them without declaring any likeness with the creation (Tamtheel)." Ijtimaa ul-Juyoosh il-Islaamiyyah (p.62)

It will be beneficial to know the statements of our Pious Predecessors regarding this matter their consensus.

Al-Waleed Ibn Muslim (d.194H) - rahimahullaah - said:

"I asked Maalik, al-Awzaa'ee, Layth Ibn Sa'd and Sufyaan ath-Thawree - rahimahumullaah - concerning the reports related about the Attributes, so they all said: Leave them as they are, without asking how." (Related by al-Aajurree in ash-Sharee'ah (p. 314), al-Bayhaqee in al-Asmaa' was-Sifaat (p. 453) and also in al-I'tiqaad (p. 118) and the chain of narrators is hasan.)

Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d.241H) - rahimahullaah - said:

"These ahaadeeth should be left as they are…We affirm them and we do not make any similitude for them. This is what has been agreed upon by the Scholars." (Related by Ibnul-Jawzee in Manaaqibul-Imaam Ahmad (p. 155-156))

Imaam at-Tirmidhee (d.279H) - rahimahullaah - said:

"It has been stated by more than one person from amongst the People of Knowledge about such ahaadeeth, that there is no tashbeeh (resemblance) to the Attributes of Allaah, and our Lord - the Blessed, the Most High - descends to the lowest heavens every night. So they say: Affirm these narrations, have faith (eemaan) in them, do not deny them, nor ask how. The likes of this has been narrated from Maalik Ibn Anas, Sufyaan ath-Thawree, Ibn 'Uyaynah and 'Abdullaah Ibnul-Mubaarak, who all said about such ahaadeeth, ''Leave them as they are, without asking how.'' Such is the statement of the People of Knowledge from Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah. However, the Jahmiyyah oppose these narrations and say: This is tashbeeh! However, Allaah - the Most High - has mentioned in various places in His Book, the Attributes of al-Yad (Hand), as-Sama' (Hearing) and al-Basr (Sight) - but the Jahmiyyah make ta'weel of these aayaat, explaining them in a way, other than how it is explained by the People of Knowledge. They say: Indeed, Allaah did not create Aadam with His own Hand - they say that 'Hand' means that Power of Allaah." Sunanut-Tirmidhee (3/24)

And the narrations are numerous.

Coming back to our topic of grave worship, Kandalvi stated 80 years ago in very explicit words the virtues and benefit of grave worship of grave worship. Not just the grave of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) but the grave of any wali. But the sanctioning required the prerequisite of labeling great virtue and honour on the graves of the auliya in general Prophet in particular. So the fabrication machines of Deobandh go into overtime and come out with the following:

Fadha'il Hajj, Page 138:



"When you see the green dome then it should be with awe and reverance and you should take care of the honour of the Huzoor and reflect that in that pure dome is he who is the best of creation, leader of the Prophets and virtuous the angels. The place of the holy grave is superior than any other place and that place which touches the holy body of the Huzoor is superior to the Ka'bah, superior to the Arsh, superior to the Kursi in fact superior than everything in the heavens and earth."

Did Kandalvi leave anything? In his extreme and false exaggeration of the grave of the Prophet he did not even spare the Arsh and Kursi of Allaah the Most High. Indeed the Allaah and his Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) are free from what they say.

Now that Kandalvi established the merit of the grave the only thing that remained was to worship there and make pilgrimage to the grave of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam). But the poor and ignorant mass of the Subcontinent and elsewhere would not waste their life savings on a lifeless prophet. Nay, when the Ummah of Muhammad leave the narrations stupidity and humiliation is placed upon them. The people want a Prophet who is alive. So enter the Shaikh al Hadith Kandalvi and his books!

On page 144, Fadha'il Hajj:



"Allamah Qastalaani writes in Muwahib that you should present yourself to the Prophet proper conduct such that was due to him in his lifetime because the Prophet is alive in His grave"

What kind of heresy is this? The Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) alive in his grave? Are we to believe Kandalvi and conclude that the Sahaba of the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) buried him alive? Was the historic speech of Abu Bakr (radhi-yallaahu 'anhu) mere jest? When he, Abu Bakr (may Allaah be pleased with be) said that whoever worships Muhammad then Muhammad is dead was a figure of speech and mockery? And Kandalvi wants us to believe in an 'aqeedah diametrically opposite to that of the Noble Sahaba?

Allaah the Mighty and Majestic said in the Qur'aan (meaning of which):

{And we granted not to any human being immortality before you (O Muhammad), then if you die would they live forever? Everyone is going to taste death, and We shall make a trial of you with evil and with good. And to Us you will be returned}, [Soorah al-Anbiya., Aayaat 34-35]

And,

{Verily, you (O Muhammad) will die, and verily, they (too) will die}, [Soorah Az-Zumar., Aayah 30]

The Prophets are alive in their graves but this is the life of the Barzakh that we do not know about. The hands of the Prophets do not come out of their graves, they cannot hear us, they cannot rescues us from harm or any other nonsense that Fadha'il 'A'maal records in this regard.

But this is not the end to open preaching of grave worship. Furthermore, a complete manual is presented in explicit detail on how to present yourself to the grave of a "wali."

On page 141, Fadha'il 'A'maal, Fadha'il Hajj, Volume II:



"When you visit anyone's grave, you should proceed from the direction of the feet because if Allaah has given the dead the power of Kashf then it is easy for him to see you because when the dead turns to his right in his grave then his sight falls towards your feet. And when anyone approaches the grave from the head side of the dead then the dead has trouble and difficulty in seing you."

Astaghfirullah! What kind of 'aqeedah is this? If we are to believe in Kandalvi, then would it be permissible to bury a wali alive? The only example of burying alive we know is that of the Arabs at the time of Ignorance. And today this practice is still found alive in Fadha'il 'A'maal. And how many brothers who are in Jamaa'at ut-Tableegh have buried their loved ones alive?

And for that matter, is Kandalvi alive in his grave?

There is not a single authentic narration found in any reliable books that state of any wali being alive in his grave and looking at the visitors of his tomb. And Kandalvi, who was given very lofty title such as "Knower of Allaah", "Pivot of the world" and "Shaikh al-Hadith" did not even know the authenticity of such incidents or was it that he did not care? Another question of the Tableeghi Jamaa'at.

So far what Kandalvi has sought to prove is the high merit and value of visiting graves and that the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and the auliya are alive in their graves and they see and listen to the visitor. The objectives of the school of Deobandh and Kandalvi will not be complete up until they cheat the unsuspecting Ummah into grave worship completely. And this would require worshipping and supplicating at graves. Since the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and the noble Pious Predecessors have always opposed this heresy, there was no option left but to lie. And lie they did. They lied on the Sahaba and the Messenger and ridiculed them to satisfy their lust for shirk and Allaah's curse be upon the liars.

So Kandalvi fabricates on page 176-177, Fadha'il Hajj:



"Hadhrat Ayesha said that when my father Hadhrat Abu Bakr was ill he willed that after his death his body should be taken to the grave of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and should be said that here is Abu Bakr and he wishes to be buried next to you. If you receive permission from there then bury me there and if not then bury me in Baqee'. Therefore, after the death of Abu Bakr and according to his will his funeral procession was taken towards the grave of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and permission was sought. Then we heard a voice from inside and there was no speaker in sight. The voice said, Send him in with honour and dignity.

"Hadhrat Ali said that when the time of death approached Hadhrat Abu Bakr he called me to his side and said, 'Wash me with the hands with which you washed the Prophet and apply on me perfume and take me to his room and ask for his permission. If upon asking his permission the doors of the room open then bury me there and if not then bury me in the common graveyard of the Muslims.'"

"Hadhrat Ali said that after the preparations of the funeral I was the first one to step forward and ask the Prophet that Abu Bakr wants your permission to be buried here. I then saw that the doors of the room where the Prophet is buried flung open and a voice said, "Send the friend to the friend.""

Let all Muslims know that the above is a lie and is not found in any authentic collections of ahadeeth. Rather, such enormous lies can only come from Tableeghi Jamaa'at who were rightfully called the Soofis of the era by the Muhaddith al-Albaanee (d.1420H). Kandalvi has not even spared the most noblest of the Sahaba and ascribed wholesale shirk to them. He wants the Muslims to believe that even the companions held the 'aqeedah that the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) listens to us from his grave!? And far removed are the Noble Companions (may Allaah be pleased with all of them). Kandalvi only wants to sanction his filthy and perverse 'aqeedah of grave licking and to do that he abused and lied on the companions. A great crime indeed!

There are hundreds of other instances of grave worship in Fadha'il Hajj (should be called Fadha''il Quboor wa Shirk al-Ibaadah). But there are other points of false 'Aqeedah that are to be exposed. We shall, inshAllaah, mention them in brief so that the reader can be warned from such lies and disown himself from the Tableeghi Jamaa'at forever.

1). A Soofi prays at the Prophet's grave and is forgiven all his previous and future sins. (page 162, Fadha'il Hajj)



2). All the Prophets, Pious Predecessors and the auliya use the Wasila of the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) in their supplication.



3). The 'Aqeedah of Auliya worship

The belief of hero worship is totally from the pagans and Shaitaan first deceived the Ummah of Adam (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) by coercing them into making images of righteous people, remembering them in their gatherings and later worshipping them. The pagan Romans used to worship their emperors, the Magians there kings, Hindus still worship heroes and heroines of their mythical folklore (and also worshipping their private parts). So Kandalvi, not finding the worship of Allaah sufficient, creates Pirs in His books who do not even have a name and to them he gives the attributes of Allaah. But this would again require some "Fadha'il" or virtues to be labeled on such auliya. They had to be so miraculous, so awesome and so noble that even the Prophets of Allaah are humbled before them! They must possess the attributes so noble and so high which belong to Allaah alone! Their station must also be superior to the Prophets and angels and the companions! In
short they must be so awesome, so stupendous that they demand unrestricted awe, love and finally worship! And with no hesitation this is what we find in Fahdail Amaal.

Fadha'il Hajj, page 164, Fadha'il 'A'maal Vol I:



"One person asked Khidr that,"Have you ever seen any wali who is better than you?" Khidr replied, "Yes, I have. I once visited the mosque of the Prophet. I saw Imaam Abdur Razzaq Muhaddith and he was teaching ahadith. The crowd and I listened to the ahadith from him. In one corner of the masjid there was a youngster sitting who had kept his head between his knees away from the crowd. I said, Do you not see that ahadith of the Prophet are being taught? Why don't you also attend the circle? He neither lifted his head nor did he look at me and said, "In that place are those who listen to ahadith from the slave of Razzaq and here are those who listen to ahadith from the Razzaq!" Hadhrat Khidr said that, "If you are indeed speaking the truth then tell who am I? He raised his head and said that, "If I am not mistaken, then you are Khidr." Hadhrat Khidr then said, "From this I came to know that there are such wali of Allaah whom even I cannot recognize.""

Allaahu Akbar! The pir (please notice that he has no name, no history and no background whatsoever. Just wild imaginations of Tableeghi Jamaa'at) in the above fable did not even raise his head and answered the questions of Khidr! And he listens to the Hadith from Allaah? The revelations comes down upon him? If Mirza Ghulam Qadiani makes such a claim all the scholars of Deobandh label him a kafir but what about the Kufr that is in their own books? To this Pir is attributed the knowledge of the unseen and kalam with Allaah. He has been raised to the status of Moosa and even more. He has been portrayed superior to Khidr (alayhi salaam)! Khidr? To whom Moosa (alayhi salaam) himself was sent by Allaah the Most High to seek knowledge?

To one who adheres to the way of the Pious Predecessors, who follows the 'aqeedah and understanding of the Sahabah, the above passage is just a pathetic laughable lie but to the ignorant Tableeghi such wali demands utmost respect, honour and reverance. But the poor Muslims who is being deceived by the Tableeghi Jamaa'at does not even realize that such a wali never existed except in the imagination of the Sufis of Deobandh and brought to life in Fadha'il 'Amaal.

But this was not enough to throw the ignorant Muslim into worshipping the creation. The elite of the Tableegi Jamaa'at needed some more spice to make the auliya all the more colourful. So the complete and absolute and independent knowledge of ghaib is attributed to the Pirs of Fadha'il A'maal.

On page 241, Fadha'il Hajj, Kandalvi writes:



"Hadhrat Abu Sa'eed Khazaz said,"I once visited the Masjid al-Haram and saw a Fakir. He had two old and tattered pieces of cloth on his body and was begging the people. I thought in my heart that such are the ones who become a burden on the people. He looked at me and recited the ayat "Know that Allaah knows what is in your hearts so beware" Abu Sa'eed then said that I repented upon the evil thought that had arisen in my heart. The fakir then called out to me and recited "He is the one who accepts the repentance of His slaves and forgives all sins".

What is being said here is that this Pir knows all the thoughts that arise in a person's heart. He has a share in the knowledge of the unseen. In very clear terms the 'Aqeedah of the Shi'a, the Qadiani and the Hindu is being propagated.

Verily Allaah the Most High has said in the Quraan(meaning of which):

{And with Him (Allaah) are the keys of the Ghayb (all that is hidden), none knows them but He}, [Soorah al-An'am, Aayah 59]

{Say: None in the heavens and the earth knows the Ghayb (Unseen) except Allaah, nor can they perceive when they shall be resurrected}, [Soorah an-Naml, Aayah 65]

{Say (O Muhammad): I have no power over benefit or hurt myself except Allaah wills. If I had the knowledge of the Ghayb (Unseen), I should have secured myself an abundance of wealth and no evil should have touched me. I am but a warner, and a bringer of glad tidings unto people who believe}, [Soorah al-A'raaf, Aayah 188]

But the last lie, the one remaining fabrication that will confirm the lordship of the auliya of Jamaa'at Tableegh is that they should be free from any need whatsoever. They should be also free and independent of Allaah Himself! May the curse of Allaah the All Powerful be on the liars.

So on page 290, Fadha'il Hajj:



"Imaam Ghazali says that the third level (of Tawakkul) which is the most highest is that a person remains such with Allaah like a dead in the hands of its washers. He has no action of his own. He reaches on such a level that he is no longer required to ask anything from Allaah."

If we are to believe Kandalvi for a fraction of a second then that will negate all the attributes of Allaah the Most High. It will negate the attribute of Allaah being All Knowing because the auliya of the Tableeghis also have a share in that. It will negate the attribute of Allaah being the Sustainer of the Universe because there are such individuals according to Kandalvi who sustain themselves and have no need of Allaah. It will negate the attribute of Allaah being the Ever Living because the Pirs of Fadha'il 'Amaal do not die (as we will read later). It will throw us into that pit of absolute Kufr that even the Arabs of Jaahiliyaa did not reach.Even they believed that Allaah was the Creator and the Sustainer. As such 'aqeedah has murdered nations of the Muslims and hundreds of millions of Muslims are being deceived, it will deprive a Muslim of what he values the most-his pure Tawheed. Such is the price of cooperating and joining hands with the Tableeghi Jamaa'at.

Stange! The Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) was sent to take out mankind from the worship of false gods and to worship Allaah alone. To take out man from worshipping the creation, to take out man from worshipping man. But Kandalvi and all of Jamaa'at Tableegh takes a person from worshipping Allaah and makes him worship the dead Pirs! May Allaah the All Powerful hasten the destruction of the Tableeghi Jamaa'at.

4). Deadless in Deobandh

The Hindu belief of Karma and the Buddhist belief of Mokti are quite the same. It means when a man dies, he does not die! That is, he is instantly reborn in another form. This cycle will continue until he hoards enough good deeds to get himself freed from this birth-rebirth process. So a man can be donkey in one life and a king in the next or a brick in the next or a woman in the other. But the main point is that there is no after life. No Munkar Nakir, no Day of Judgement and no Hellfire or Paradise. In a layman's words, death is not dying. It is reliving.

This is only a brief explanation of such mythical pagans. But the Tableeghi Jamaa'at has been propagating such beliefs to the unsuspecting Muslims for the last 80 years. The fabulous Sufis of India under the influence of centuries of Hinduism and Buddhism came up with some very interesting yet pagan beliefs. And for the first time in the History of Sufism in the subcontinent these naked beggars who performed all sorts of depraved acts with animals and young boys in public preached their fantasies under the guise of Sunnah. Today their unholy alliance with the Shaitaan is known to all Muslims as the Jamaa'at at-Tableegh.

Before we proceed, we should remind ourselves about death and what Allaah the Most High has said (meaning of which):

{And we granted not to any human being immortality before you (O Muhammad), then if you die would they live forever? Everyone is going to taste death, and We shall make a trial of you with evil and with good. And to Us you will be returned}, [Soorah al-Anbiya. Aayaat 34-35]

{Verily, you (O Muhammad) will die, and verily, they (too) will die}, [Soorah Az-Zumar, Aayah 30]

{Muhammad is no more than a Messenger, and indeed (many) Messengers have passed away before him. If he dies or is killed, will you turn back on your heels (as disbelievers)? And he who turns back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allaah, and Allaah will give reward to those who are grateful}, [Soorah Aal-'Imraan, Aayah 144]

Kandalvi, the "Shaikh al-Hadith" wrote on page 271-272, Fadha'il Hajj, Fadha'il Amaal Vol I:



"Hadhrat Abu Sa'eed Khazzaz asid that, "I once went to Makkah Mukkarrama and passed through the door of Bani Shabbir. I saw the corpse of a young man who had a very beautiful face. I looked at his face carefully to which he replied, "Abu Saeed! Don't you know that lovers do not die? They remain alive, even though they appear to be dead. Their death takes them from one world to another.""

This was and is the belief of the elite of Deobandh. The pagan Egyptians had exactly the same beliefs that their pharaohs do not die but transfer from one world to another. Hence they used to mummify them and keep all important items in their caskets. Five thousand years later the pagan belief is still being propagated en masse!

But this is just the tip of the ice berg on the dead-less Pirs of Fadha'il Amaal! There are also such Pirs who even know when and where they are going to die.

On page 272, Fadha'il Hajj, Fadha'il Amaal Vol I:



"Sh. Abu Yaqoob Sanoosi said,"Once a mureed of mine approached me in Makkah and said,"Ustaadh, I will die tomorrow at the time of Dhuhr. Take these gold coins. Spend half on digging my grave and half on my shroud." On the next day when the time of Dhuhr approached, he entered the masjid, performed the Tawaaf and went to a nearby spot and died! When he was put into the grave, he opened his eyes!! I asked that Is there a life after death? He replied, "Yes! I am alive and every lover of Allaah does not die.""

The Shi'a 'Aqeedah: The Imams know when they will die, and they only die by their choice. (Al-Kafi (a book of the Shi'a containing ahadith attributed to the Prophet) p.258)

So if every lover of Allaah never dies, then what is the difference between the mureed and Allaah? Allaah is Hayy and does not die and the mureed does not die. And furthermore, these mureed also know when they die. Allaahu Musta'aan! Where is the Tableegh Jamaa'at taking the Ummah of Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam)?

The Imaam of evil, Ibn Arabee, poisoned with such beliefs said:

The Lord is a slave and the slave is a Lord. I only wish I knew which one was Mukallaf.

As we read investigate further into Fadha'il Amaal, not only are time and death under the exploitation of the Pirs of Sufiya but also the Ka'bah comes to the rescue of certain damsels in distress in Fadha'il Amaal. Yes! Kandalvi did not even spare the House of Allaah from insults and belittlement.

And it is authentically ported in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree and Saheeh Muslim from Abu Hurayrah (radhi-yallaahu 'anhu) that Dhus Suwaiqatain from Ethiopia will destroy the Ka'bah, stone by stone.

If the Ka'bah cannot save itself from annihilation then how can it grow hands and come to the rescue of women who walk around attracting attention by wearing anklets?

On page 105, Fadha'il Hajj, Fadha'il Amaal Vol I:



"Moosa bin Muhammad says that once an Ajmee (a non-Arab) person was performing the Tawaaf; was a good and religious man. During the Tawaaf, the sound of the anklets of a beautiful woman fell on his ears. He began to stare at the woman. From the Yemeni Corner a hand emerged and slapped the man as a result of which his eye came out and from the wall of the House of Allaah came a voice saying, "You make Tawaaf of our house and look at our women. This slap was in return for that look. If you repeat such behaviour again, we will slap avenge you harder."

Where was the hand of the Ka'bah when the Sahaba of the Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) were being tortured? Where was the Ka'bah when filth and camel intestines were put on the back of the Messenger (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam)? Why did not the Ka'bah grew a hundred hands and save Ibn Zubair? Why did not the Ka'bah mutate into an octopus and destroy every idol that the Mushriks of Makkah had kept therein? Or does the Ka'bah comes only to rescue the women of Fadha'il Amaal? Has the mutation of the Ka'bah stopped? Does it still continue today?

Such are the lies that come out from the fabrication machines in Deobandh! Such stupidity and corruption of 'aqeedah has caused the downfall of the Muslims. Believing in grave worship, hero-worship, associating partners with the Noble names and attributes of Allaah had caused the cow worshipping, monkey supplicating Hindu to gain ascendancy over the Muslims in the sub-continent? And who is to blame for such filthy stupidity? The Jamaa'at Tableegh and their books!

But this is not an end to the insults that the House of Allaah, the House built by Ibraheem (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) had to face by the elite of Jammat Tableegh. Not only does the Ka'bah grows hands but sometimes it also pays the great auliya of Fadha'il Amaal greeting visits!?!

Page 111, Fadha'il Hajj, Fadha'il Amaal Vol lI:



"And it has been reported from certain buzurgs that some people live in Khurasaan but are close to the ones who perform the Tawaaf. And yet there are some to whom the Ka'bah itself goes to visit them…"

Astaghfirullah! Why did not the Ka'bah visit the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and the Noble companions who lived in exile for 10 years in Madinah? Where was the Ka'bah when the Sahaba were turned back empty handed and prevented from performing Hajj? Why did not the Ka'bah come to visit the greatest of the people? And Kandalvi wants us to believe that the Ka'bah visits pathetic Pirs of Sufism? What justice is this?

Indeed, when the Ummah of Muhammad (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) left the narrations and the way of the companions, humiliation and stupidity is placed upon them. So much so, anyone calling to Tawheed is labeled a Wahabi, anyone calling to detaching oneself from deviated organizations and parties a Madhkhali and the callers to shirk, bid`ah, grave worship are given the titles of Imaams of guidance and Shaikh al Hadith! What can be more stupidity than this?

4). Jesus Saves!!!! (And so do the Pirs in Fadha'il Amaal)

Have you ever argued with Christian and he will always end the talk with the term "But Jesus Saves" or "Jesus died for us" The auliya portrayed in Fadha'il Amaal do similar things. Not that they will die for you (are you kidding, who will then reap the profits from the tombs and graves?) but they will provide you with heavenly faxes, gush water out of nowhere, perform Hajj naked, and occasionally travel faster than the speed of light. Such are the greats of Deobandh and the entire Tableegh Jamaa'at believes it! (And scientists say that fish have small brains).

Page 232, Fadha'il Hajj:



Hadhrat Dhun Noon Misri said," I saw a young man near the Ka'bah shareef who was performing much rukoo' and sujood. I asked him why was he praying so much (Sufis not pray so it was strange for this pir). He replied, "I am asking permission to return to my country." I then saw a piece of paper drop from the sky. It was written, "From Allaah the Most Majestic the Most Merciful to His thankful slave that return to your country. All your previous and future sins have been forgiven."

Is this lie even worth a second thought? Who is this young man? Why is not such a great event recorded in any authentic book except Fadha'il Amaal and other books of Sufism? Is this "fax" present? Does such events, paper or books drop out of the heaven still? Or is this just another fabrication to prove the high station of fictitious Pirs ? Every Muslim who values his Tawheed will no doubt shun and hate such evil teachings and label it so be from the conspiracy of the Kuffar but to our dismay such evil is recorded with great pride in Fadha'il Amaal; perhaps the most widely read book in the Ummah today.

The above lie reminds me of another liar who also claimed of paper and Allaah. All the Muslims know this liar as the Dajjal of the east, Mirza Ghulam Qadiani. The following story is a stark resemblance and further proof that the fabrications in Fadha'il Amaal are from Qadiyaniyyah and have nothing to do with the authentic Sunnah and Islaam as a whole.The following passage is taken from the book "Ahmadiyyat of True Islaam" by Mirza Bashiruddin.

"He (Ghulam Ahmad) saw in a dream that he had prepared a chart which related to some future events in his own life and in the lives of some friends, which he desired God to approve. He then saw God personified. He placed the chart before Him for His signature. God signed the chart with red ink. Before signing He flicked the surplus ink from the end of the pen with a movement of His Hand. Some drops of ink thus flicked fell on the clothes of the Promised Messiah. A realization of he love and graciousness of God in granting his request filled his eyes with tears and with a slight spasm he woke up. A disciple of his, named Mian Abdullah Sinnouri, who was at that time massaging him, drew his attention to some wet drops of red on his clothes. The Promised Messiah then related the Kashf to him in detail." (Page 86)

I ask every reader that to decide whether the Sunnah is being propagated or Qadiyaniyyah?

This is how the Shayateen amongst the men and Jinn deceive the people. InshAllaah, future studies will expose the already dead and exposed Qadiyaniyyah faith in the light of Qur.aan and Sunnah. But the point of mentioning the above heresy is to explain the similarities in the dreams and visions that both the Pirs of Qadian and Deobandh experience. In both schools of stupidity events that happen in dreams last after the dreams are over. Both claim to be divinely inspired and have something of alleged revelation within them. Tableegh Jamaa'at claims papers drop out of heaven with words of Allaah on them and the Qadiyaniyyah claim Allaah himself writes on papers. Can this be the work of one Devil? Allaah knows best. And far above is Allaah with what the liars attribute to Him. The Most High will avenge His honour on he day when none will talk except whom He allows. With Allaah belongs All Glory and Might.

Coming back to Fadha'il Amaal and Tableeghi Jamaa'at, there is a mention of such a noble Pir who not only sets out for Hajj with nothing but performs it naked! I wonder how many brothers who are fooled by Jamaa'at at-Tableegh have performed the Hajj naked and taken their families, wives and daughters in that state. My advice to them is that not only is it haram to run around the Ka'bah with your awraa exposed (and being the imitation of the early pagan Arabs) but the Saudi authorities also have strict regulations about the attire during Hajj. Please my brothers! The Sunnah explicitly clarifies the clothing one should wear during Hajj and it is certainly not being naked as being propagated by Fadha'il Amaal.

Page 221, Fadha'il Hajj:



"Hadhrat Malik after listening to his talk offered him his Kurta but he refused and said that it is better to stay naked than to wear the clothing of this world. You will have to answer for the Halal things of this world and receive punishment for the haram. After that he made a dua, "O Allaah! With sacrificing the Udhiyah your nearness is achieved. I do not have any thing except my life. I present it in your domain. Please accept it." After that, he uttered a scream and died. Then came a voice from the ghaib saying, "He is the friend of Allaah." Malik said that the whole night I was thinking about him. I then saw him in my dream. I asked him "How were you judged?" He said, "Like the martyrs of Badr, and even better." I asked,"How?" He replied,"They were martyred by the swords of the Kuffar and I by the sword of the love for Maula."

This is the love Kandalvi and Jamaa'at Tableegh had for their Pirs. They loved them and adored them even more than the martyrs of Badr. And who is this Pir? Nameless, dateless, clothless, suicidal and insane. What was this voice from ghaib? Are we to believe that Allaah the Most High took a naked and suicidal Sufi for his friend? Why was there no voice heard for martyrs of Uhud? What kind of miracles are these that only happen to the elite Sufis and not to the most Noble Companions?

All the Prophets, their companions and scholars died or were murdered unjustly, why was there no voice from the heavens, why did not any paper or book drop from the sky and attest to their wilaya or is this prestige reserved for the Pirs in Sufiya only? Who are more deserving of receiving such extraordinary and miraculous help? The Prophets or nameless and naked Pirs? Again, my Muslim brother and sister should reflect on the insanity and extremism being openly preached in Fahdail Amaal. The extremism in Adab and awe finally led to worship!

Tableegh Jamaa'at in reality have no love for the Messenger of Allaah (sal-Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) and his companions. They only love and adore their auliya who are lost in history and are most often figures of imagination by the authors of their books.

There are still other insults to the intellect that are to be found in Tableeghi Nisaab, better known as Fadha'il Amaal (officially banned in Saudi Arabia, alhamdulillah), such as:

1). A Pir by the name of Moosa Darir travels 2700 miles in a part of a night to pray Fajr in Makkah. (Even the F-16 Falcon cannot travel this fast, page.233, Fadha'il Hajj)



2). Khidr feeds "Baqilla" (a type of food) to a wandering Sufi in a jungle. (page. 245)



3). A mureed who was did not eat for 40 days supplicates to Junaid Baghdadi in the Jungle for water and is granted his wish. (page. 242-243, Fadha'il Hajj, Fadha'il Amaal, Vol II)





Such are the paganistic beliefs contained in Fadha'il Amaal. It has retarded the Muslims en masse, murdered whole nations of Islaam, have cast the evil cloud of shirk and grave worshipping over no less than 200 million Muslims worldwide. It has divided the hearts of the Muslim and instead of guiding the Muslim to the Qur.aan and pure Sunnah, it attaches them to some ignorant personality, making taqleed of him and taking him as absolute authority in all affairs of life. This is the book, Fadha'il Amaal, the book that another Hizb, Ihyaa Turaath and in particular the Urdu section in Kuwait openly claimed it is fine to take the good and leave the evil from it.

Woe unto you Ihyaa Turaath! You gather the people under the false garb of the Sunnah and your only aim is to swell your numbers! So you do not have any regard for Sunnah or Tawheed but your only concern is the crowd. And it was the crowd that the callers in Ihyaa Turaath feared. They feared that it would lessen their number if they spoke out against Jamaa'at Tableegh so they lied and guided them to the worst manual of shirk, bid`ah and Khurafaat that has ever come upon the Ummah in the last 1400 years.

It has given the genitalia worshipping Hindu ascendancy over the Muslim. Fadha'il Amaal and the Tableeghi Jamaa'at have stolen Tawheed and Sunnah from every home replacing it with stories and fables that resemble those of the Hindu scriptures laden with shirk, bid`ah and Khurafaat. A hundred versions of Islaam exist today. Some fuelled by the Ikhwan al-Mufliseen, others by the likes if Hizb at-Tahreer and Jamaat e-Islaami and some by the likes of Qardawee (the lover of female singers and enticers) and Qutb. The common trait in all these diseases is that they are devoid of Tawheed, Sunnah and the understanding of the Pious Predecessors. Verily they were the best but the people have left them for something inferior. Just like the fornicators in Hell will leave fatty tasty meat for the rotten one, the Muslim Ummah has been given rotten, smelly personalities and books and the pure Sunnah is hidden and suppressed.

Why have we allowed the Tableeghi Jamaa'at and their likes to fool us, to deceive us in the name of prayer and fasting? Why are they getting away by murdering and raping no less that 200 million Muslims worldwide of their 'aqeedah? This is the greatest genocide ever perpetrated against the Ummah. The Tartar murdered and looted but the Tableegh Jamaa'at murder the Sunnah and steal our Tawheed! Is this not a greater crime? Is it not better that a Muslim is murdered while he us upon sound 'aqeedah than live for even 1 year with Jamaa'at Tableegh and commit the worst form of shirk ever unleashed? Why have we allowed them to play with our noble deen, removing what they feel and adding what they feel?

They have also stolen the children of the Muslim Ummah. Stealing them from mosques and study circles and dumping them like corpses into their Sufi Khanqahs, stealing the Ibaadah of Allaah alone and giving them to worship man made auliya!

This is the time we wake up! We wake up to get back what was stolen from us. We get back to rid ourselves from the Tableeghi Jamaa'at, get rid of their shirk, their bid`ah and their stories. And I swear by Allaah the Most Worthy of Praise that the only way is through Knowledge. Through knowing what is shirk and what is Tawheed, through knowing what is Sunnah and what is bid`ah. This is the only way we will be able to save ourselves and our families from the Fire the fuel of which is men and stones.

The time is now to wake up and break the shackles of blind following, of extremism and returning to the Pure Deen revealed by Allaah the Most High to His Prophet Muhammad and that which he preached to his noble companions.

We seek help from Allaah for it is only Him the Most Merciful who can help us and rid us of our humiliation and this can only be done by returning to practising Islaam as understood by our Pious Predecessors.

And with this we end the third part of the series. To Allaah we belong and to Him is our return.

Wassalam alaikum

The Slave of Allaah
Abu Mu'awiyah

Morning of Dhul-Qi'dah 11, 1422H
Thursday, 24th of January, 2002

"UNQUOTE"