Showing posts with label General Mahmud Ali Durrani. Show all posts
Showing posts with label General Mahmud Ali Durrani. Show all posts

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Excellent "IQ" of Syed Talat Hussain (Dawn News)

Some members of the Pakistani establishment and especially those agencies (nowadays this role has been taken over by the TV Anchors specifically Jang Group of Newspapers), which have assumed the role of determining what is ‘national interest of Pakistan’, and who is loyal, and who is anti Pakistan, have perhaps done more damage to Pakistan than known enemies of Pakistan. It is unfortunate that every blunder, be it at national level or in foreign affairs, is made in the name of ‘national interest of Pakistan’. People of Pakistan are perplexed as they fail to understand what is ’national interest of Pakistan. People are further bewildered when some of these leaders, perceived and declared as ‘anti Pakistan’ or ‘security risk’ are sworn in to hold some kind of office in Pakistan. There are many examples where people declared as an ‘Indian agent’ or ‘traitor’ had taken high public office; even those who had no Pakistani nationality or rescinded it, had an opportunity to become Prime Minister of Pakistan. Once these people have decided that something is in the ‘national interest of Pakistan’, they will pursue that agenda without having any system of check and balance and appraisal. If any one dares to criticize what they do in the name of ‘national interest of Pakistan’, he/she is declared as ‘anti Pakistan’. Similarly if a Pakistani person criticizes Pakistan government, or holds demonstration against the government policy, he is declared as ‘anti Pakistan’.

Malik Riaz Fiasco:  On 9th June 2012, Mr Talat Hussain (PTV, ARY, AAJ TV and Dawn News) replied to the allegations on News Night with Talat - Ep 414 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I35jMmnRib0  of Mr. Najam Sethi (The Friday Times, Farooq Laghari Cabinet, Daily Times, Dunya TV and now GEO TV) on Mr. Talat in Aapas ki baat - 6th june 2012 part 4, had the program of Mr. Talat been only restricted to a reply to Mr. Najam's allegations then it would have been fine but Mr Talat Hussain took a giant step unnecessarily and inserted Islam in a worst possible way to defend himself and Alleged TV Channel Dawn News. I have used several episodes of Mr. Talat Hussain and Mr. Najam Sethi programs for my blog because both of these gentlemen are far better than other Jokers in Media e.g. Kamran Khan, Javed Chaudhry, Dr Shahid Masood, Anal Retentive Nadeem Malik, Official Haji "Asma Shirazi", Murderous Meher Bukhari w/o equally obnoxious Kashif Abbasi, list goes on and on.I wonder what was the need of showing personal Bank Accounts and Property Details on TV Show which Syed Talat Hussain did and making a joke of himself, one can raise a question that people don't hide "Black Money" in an open Bank Account. ---- Way back in 2009 : - If anyone needs evidence that Pakistan’s most popular TV anchors just reel off nonsense without checking facts, please watch the interview given by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to a group of Pakistani anchors. Talat Hussain of Aaj TV, who often speaks as if he knows everything, wanted to embarrass Hillary by “proving” that the U.S, does not give Pakistan enough. In his recent shows he has been mouthing off against the “insulting language” in the Kerry-Lugar-Berman aid bill, which triples non-military assistance to Pakistan to $ 1.5 billion per year for five years. Talat claimed that the U.S. was paying Kyrgyzstan $ 700 million as rent for a military base in that country. Hillary corrected the arrogant and self-righteous Aaj TV anchor and said the rent was not that high but was in the range of $ 50 million. Not one to ever digest facts, especially those that prove him wrong, Talat Hussain continued on to say that must be the rent “per month.” The US Secretary of State remained polite and left the Kyrgyzstan base rent figure unresolved. None of the other “famous and popular” anchors, including Moeed Pirzada, Nasim Zehra, Naveen Naqvi, Mubashir Luqman and others, knew the figure themselves to be able to step in and correct their colleague. So, what does a simple google search reveal to be the fact? The US agreed in June 2009 to triple the rent of its base in Manas, Kyrgyzstan to $ 60 million, up from $ 17 million, PER YEAR. The US also agreed to pay an additional $ 37 million to Kyrgyzstan to build new aircraft parking slots and storage areas, plus another $30 million for new navigation systems. That adds up to a grand total of $ 127 million in the first year and a recurrent payment per year of still $ 60 million only! Here’s the link to a CBS news story one of many stories on the subject available on the internet http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/06/23/world/main5105784.shtml , beyond the crazy right-wing dominated Pakistani blogs. Where did Talat Hussain of Aaj get his figure of $ 700 million per year? Nobody knows. Maybe from his friends Shireen Mazari or Ahmed Quraishi—all purveyors of anti-US opinions with little regard for facts. REFERENCE: Talat Hussain makes a $640 Million Mistake Friday, October 30th, 2009 http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2009/10/30/talat-hussain-makes-a-640-million-mistake/

Bahria Town Advertisement for Dawn 11 June 2012 - Talat Hussain Alleged Rough Programs on Malik Riaz gets Advertisement from Mailk Riaz PAGE 2 Dawn 11/6/2012 http://epaper.dawn.com/Advt.php?StoryImage=11_06_2012_002_006






December 20, 2008 NEW DELHI: Senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal on Friday welcomed former Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharifís acknowledgement that Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving terrorist in the Mumbai terror attacks, is a Pakistani, says Hindustan Times. “We welcome Sharif’s statement acknowledging that Ajmal is a Pakistani. We already had that knowledge like every one does,” Sibal, who is also the science and technology minister, told reporters. “All big democracies in the world agree that resources in Pakistan were used for the dastardly terrorist attack on Mumbai,” he said. Sharif told Geo News that he checked and found out that Ajmal Kasab’s native village has been cordoned off and his parents shifted out to an undisclosed location to evade the media. REFERENCE: Congress welcomes Nawaz’s remarks on Kasab News Desk Saturday, December 20, 2008 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=19096&Cat=13&dt=12/20/2008

Nawaz Sharif Openly Admits Kasab is Pakistani



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QskmhhABTLk


ISLAMABAD, Jan 7 2009 Pakistani authorities, during the course of their own investigations into the Mumbai carnage, have established that the only surviving terrorist Ajmal Kasab is a Pakistani national. After a series of conflicting statements by various officials representing different sections of the government, it was officially acknowledged that DawnNews TV`s news item about the official investigation report regarding Ajmal Kasab`s identity was correct. Earlier, a high-ranking government official had told Dawn that the preliminary finding had provided enough information to conclude that the man at present in India`s custody was from a Punjab village, and perhaps belonged to a militant group that was bent upon destabilising the region by undermining the peace process. The official, who requested anonymity, said the authorities were examining all parts of the puzzle on the basis of their own investigation, as well as the information provided by India and the Americans. However, he said there was no doubt in the minds of the investigators that the captured terrorist was a Pakistani. “Sadly, it has been established that Kasab is a Pakistani national.” But within minutes of the revelation, confusing, and somewhat conflicting, statements started emanating from different sections of the government in Islamabad. While the Indian television channel CNN-IBN quoted Pakistan`s National Security Adviser Mehmud Ali Durrani as saying that Ajmal Kasab`s identity as a Pakistani had been established, Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir told the same channel that it was premature to say anything because the investigation was continuing. In the midst of all this, American news agency APTN quoted Information Minister Sherry Rehman as confirming that Ajmal Kasab in fact was a Pakistani national. The minister later confirmed it to Dawn that “he is Pakistani” and that investigations are ongoing. Similarly, the Foreign Office which at the initial stage appeared either detached from reality or completely out of the loop, admitted by broadcasting through the state-run PTV that Ajmal Kasab was indeed a Pakistani national. During the course of Dawn`s own investigation, a number of senior officials in the interior ministry and police said that investigations were started soon after initial reports had suggested that Ajmal Kasab might be a Pakistani national. But the authorities wanted to be doubly sure about his identity because there was no record of Kasab and his family in the national database maintained by Nadra. Details of preliminary investigations submitted to the government have still not been made public. The official who confirmed to Dawn about the preliminary investigation report said Kasab was son of Amir Kasab and Mrs Noor Illahi. But the identity of other militants killed in Mumbai is yet to be established. Senior security officials, however, said that preliminary investigations had established that the militants were operating on their own and had absolutely no link with any section of the country`s security apparatus. A top ranking western diplomat also confirmed to Dawn that there was no linkage between the terrorists who carried out the Mumbai carnage and the Pakistani security agencies, particularly the ISI. “There is ample evidence to prove that most of the terrorists belonged to Pakistan,” the diplomat said. “But there is not even a shred of evidence to suggest that the ISI or any other Pakistani intelligence agency had any links with these terrorists,” the diplomat said. “And this is not based on what the Pakistanis have been telling us, as we have double checked it on our own,” the diplomat added. The remarks belie the latest claim by Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh who on Tuesday had tried to up the ante by directly accusing the Pakistani security apparatus of being involved in the Mumbai carnage. Pakistan has already rejected the Indian accusation in strongest terms. In a related development, a statement by Prime Minister Yousuf Gilani also said the Pakistan`s investigations into the Mumbai attacks had made progress. He said that some information of an interim nature on Indian investigations had been received. He did not elaborate. Punjab`s dusty town of Faridkot became the centre of attention soon after the deadly Mumbai attack as the Indian authorities captured Kasab and claimed that he belonged to Faridkot. The town was thronged by local and foreign media and conflicting reports came out about the identity of Kasab. At that time the government had, for obvious reasons, decided to adopt a tight-lipped policy, maintaining that only a thorough investigation, based on concrete information, could establish whether Kasab was a Pakistani national, and a resident of Faridkot. Answering a question about consular access to Kasab, a senior official said the militant had damaged Pakistan `like no other`. “We are not yet sure when to ask for consular access. We may not ask for it. He is involved in a heinous crime,” the official said. Kasab also wrote a letter to the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi. Pakistani authorities said they were examining the letter. REFERENCE: Ajmal`s nationality confirmed By Mubashir Zaidi Dawn (Pakistani Newspaper). 8 January 2009 http://archives.dawn.com/archives/42931

Live with Talat on Mumbai Tragedy - 1 (AAJ TV 2009)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWpxp7N3oBA

China backed ban Amir Mir Friday, December 12, 2008 LAHORE: The United Nations Security Council’s decision to ban the Jamaat-ud-Daawa (JuD) as a global terrorist organisation could only become possible after China, which had thrice blocked similar attempts, finally gave its crucial yes vote for the UN resolution. Diplomatic analysts said this change came apparently in the aftermath of the pressure created by the Mumbai terror attacks. The Al-Qaeda and Taliban Sanctions Committee of the UN Security Council approved on December 10, 2008 the addition of† four entries to its consolidated list of individuals and entities subject to the assets freeze and travel ban, including the JuD and its Ameer Hafiz Mohammad Saeed. According to well placed Foreign Office sources, three resolutions seeking a ban on the JuD, tabled before the UN Security Council since 2003, had been simply put on technical hold by Beijing, while using its veto right being one of the five permanent UNSC members. Each time the Al-Qaeda, Taliban Sanctions Committee of the Security Council tabled a resolution to include the Jamaat-ud-Daawa in the list of terrorist groups, China blocked the move, while seeking credible evidence from the United Nations indicating JuD’s terror links. Technical hold requires information demanded by any permanent member of the UNSC before processing a resolution to declare someone a terrorist organisation. The Chinese authorities reportedly used to intervene in the past on the request of the Musharraf regime. However, it had become hard for Beijing to vote against the move in the aftermath of the Mumbai terror attacks and the evidence furnished by the Indian authorities.The Al-Qaeda and Taliban Sanctions Committee has the mandate to impose economic sanctions on the individuals and entities associated with al-Qaeda, its chief Osama bin Laden or with the Taliban wherever located. The Committee, comprising 15 members, also entertains requests made by any member state on whose territory any terrorist organisation exists. The committee had previously declared the Lashkar-e-Taiba a terrorist outfit on May 2, 2005, while acting under a US request. The UN move was followed by the US State Department’s decision to brand Jamaat-ud- Daawa a terrorist organisation, saying it was a front for the Lashkar-e-Taiba.

Much before that, in December 2001, the US State Department had designated the Lashkar-e-Taiba a foreign terrorist organisation, following the attack on the Indian parliament on December 13, 2001, prompting the Musharraf regime to ban the group and freeze its assets on January 13, 2002. However, a few weeks before that, Hafiz Saeed announced his stepping down as the LeT chief besides launching of the Jamaat-ud-Daawa. Addressing a press conference in Lahore on December 24, 2001, Hafiz Saeed announced his resignation and the appointment of Maulana Abdul Wahid Kashmiri as the new LeT chief. Hafiz Sahib further announced that the Lashkar has wrapped up its organisational set-up and moved its base from Pakistan to Srinagar in Kashmir. Since then, the JuD has denied having any links with the LeT, making Hafiz Saeed to go to the extent of denying that he had ever been the Lashkar Ameer. The Pakistan government had been resisting the US pressure in the past to ban the JuD as a terrorist†outfit on the grounds that it was a charity-cum-humanitarian relief organisation, having nothing to do with the Lashkar-e-Taiba. As the US treasury department accused the Jamaatud Daawa in its Anti-Terrorist Financing Guidelines for the US-based charities on September 29, 2006 of supporting and financing terrorists under the guise of relief work for the October 2005 quake victims, the Musharraf regime decided to place the JuD on the watch list of the Pakistani interior ministry on August 20, 2006, instead of declaring it a terrorist group. A Pakistan government spokesperson subsequently stated on May 3, 2006: “The government has no intention of designating the Jamaatud Daawa and its affiliate organisations as terrorist entities as done by the US”. However, Pakistan would be legally bound to take action if they were placed on the consolidated list of United Nations Security Council Sanctions Committee. But in the aftermath of the UNSC decision to brand the JuD a terrorist group, well placed government circles in Islamabad do not rule out the possibility of Islamabad finally clamping a ban on the group. REFERENCE: China backed ban Amir Mir Friday, December 12, 2008 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=18900&Cat=13&dt=12/12/2008


Live with Talat on Mumbai Tragedy - 2 (AAJ TV 2009)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiOMrVNbdl8



Govt cracks down on Daawa after UN ban News Desk Friday, December 12, 2008 : LAHORE: Pakistan launched a countrywide crackdown on Thursday against Jamaat-ud-Daawa as the police in all the four provinces and Azad Kashmir raided Daawa offices, nabbed many of its activists and put its chief Hafiz Saeed under house arrest following the UNSC sanctions against the organisation and its four leaders. The UNSC committee Wednesday added four leaders of Jamaat-ud-Daawa to a list of people and groups facing sanctions for ties to al-Qaeda or the Taliban, including a freeze on assets and a travel ban. The four Jamaat leaders are Hafiz Saeed, the group’s chief; Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the group’s chief of operations; Haji Muhammad Ashraf, its chief of finance; and India-born Mahmoud Mohammad Ahmed Bahaziq, described as a financier for the group who served as its chief in Saudi Arabia. The same four were hit with US Treasury Department sanctions in May. The UN sanctions, covered by Security Council resolution 1267 from 1999, include the mandatory freezing of assets and travel bans. The sanctions also covered what the committee said was a new alias for Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jamaatud Dawa. An Indian government minister asked the council during a special session on terrorism to include Jamaatud Dawa  on the UN blacklist. Meanwhile, Lahore Police has detained Ameer Jamaatud Daawa Hafiz Muhammad Saeed at his house in 116-E Block, Johar Town for three months and heavy contingent of police have been posted outside his residence. SSP Operation Lahore Ch Shafiq Ahmad has confirmed the house arrest of JD Ameer and said that Jamia Qadisia, the headquarters of the organization at Chowburji Chowk has also been sealed. Meanwhile, government moved to shut down Jamaatud Daawa offices throughout the country and ordered its leaders be placed under house arrest. Police began closing the Daawa offices across the country on orders issued by the central government after the UN Security Council declared the charity a terrorist group. “Instructions have been issued to seal Jamaatud Daawa offices in all the four provinces as well as Azad Kashmir,” said Interior Ministry spokesman Shahidullah Baig. Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani confirmed the arrest of two leaders belonging to Lashkar-e-Taiba. The two men are senior members of the banned Islamist group and have both been named by Indian media as key planners of the devastating attack on Mumbai.

Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi and Zarar Shah were in detention and an investigation was underway, Yousuf Raza Gilani told the journalists. Meanwhile, the police are conducting raids and arresting the Jammatud Daawa activists besides sealing its offices throughout NWFP following the government announced to ban the Daawa. Soon after the announcement made by the federal government, the Peshawar police raided the office of the outfit located at Fawara Chowk in the cantonment area of the provincial metropolis. Two officers and a few constables went into the office of the organisation that bore the sign board of a monthly magazine, ‘The Voice of Islam’ on its front gate. Sources told The News that the activists of the organisation had already sealed the office before the police did so. The sources said that before the federal government made the formal announcement to ban JuD, its activists came to the office, shifted necessary goods and sealed it. The security forces, meanwhile, raided the office of Jamaatud Daawa situated at Parhana in Manshera district and arrested five of its activists. In another raid, the security personnel stormed the relief office of the Daawa in Ghazikot Township a day before Eidul Azha and sealed it. During the raid carried out by the personnel of the security agencies early Thursday at JuD’s relief camp-cum-office at Parhana, five of its members were taken into custody who were then shifted to an undisclosed location. The security personnel, the sources said, had also picked six activists of Daawa from the main relief camp of the organisation, located at the main Karakoram Highway near Ghazikot Township, and the raid was conducted at Parhana on the information extracted from these activists. Meanwhile, the authorities sealed the offices and establishment of Jamaatud Daawa in Hazar Division. Sources said the security forces raided office of the organisation in Abbottabad late in the night and sealed the office. The offices of the organisation were also sealed in Haripur. REFERENCE: Govt cracks down on Daawa after UN ban News Desk Friday, December 12, 2008 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=18899&Cat=13&dt=12/12/2008

Live with Talat on Mumbai Tragedy - 3 (AAJ TV 2009)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RrgsHtgzi8


UN ban on Daawa Friday, December 12, 2008 ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood has said that under the UN Security Council Resolution 1267, certain individuals and entities have been designated by the Al-Qaeda and Taliban Sanctions Committee on December 10, 2008. He said in a statement issued here on Thursday that an official communication from the UN in this regard had been received by the government. He said that the government had initiated the process to comply with the listing of the Jamaat-ud-Daawa, certain other trusts and individuals by the Sanctions Committee. Following is the text of the statement; “Under the Security Council Resolution 1267, certain individuals and entities have been designated by the Al-Qaida and Taliban Sanctions Committee on 10 December 2008. An official communication from the UN in this regard has been received by the Government of Pakistan. These entities and individuals include Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jamaat ud Daawa. It is obligatory for all states to comply with international obligations arising from Security Council decisions. Accordingly, the Government of Pakistan has initiated the process to comply with the listing of Jamaat ud Daawa certain other trusts as well as individuals by the Sanetions Committee.

As regards the spate of allegations concerning the involvement of certain individuals of Pakistani origin in Mumbai terrorist attacks, the Government of Pakistan has already initiated investigations on its own. It is the firm conviction of Pakistan not to allow its territory to be used for any act of terrorism. Pakistan itself has been a victim of terrorism. However, our own investigations cannot proceed beyond a certain point without provision of credible information and evidence pertaining to Mumbai attacks. Despite our requests, no evidence or information has been shared with the Government by India so far. Any criminal investigation proceeds from the scene of crime to thecriminal. This is standard investigation procedure. Pakistan has repeatedlyunderscored the need for serious, sustained and pragmatic cooperation between Pakistan and India to combat terrorism in either country. Our proposals for the establishment of a joint commission as well as joint investigations have been made in an earnest effort to move forward in an area, which equally concerns both Pakistan and India. As far as Pakistan’s own investigations are concerned, these will bepursued in accordance with our own laws. Pakistan is committed to internationally respected concept of “due process”. It is Pakistan’s firm determination to do whatever it can to eliminate the threat of terrorism from South Asia.” REFERENCE: UN ban on Daawa Friday, December 12, 2008 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=18908&Cat=13&dt=12/12/2008



Major Jihadi groups disappear Mazhar Tufail Saturday, December 13, 2008 ISLAMABAD: A coalition of five major Jihadi organisations, led by the once fiery militant commander Syed Salahuddin, has simply disappeared. It has temporarily dissolved itself, closed its offices, removed all signs and asked its leaders to stay quiet. The strategy follows the current Pakistan-India tension following the Mumbai blasts and the ban imposed by the UN on several such organisations in Pakistan. The United Jihad Council (UJC) is a major Kashmiri group comprising Harkat-ul-Ansar, Hizbul Mujahideen, Jamiat-ul-Mujahideen, Al-Jihad, Al-Barq, Ikhwan-ul-Mussalmin andTehrik-ul-Mujahideen. By early 1999, as many as 15 organisations were affiliated with the council, though only five of these were considered influential. “Following the Mumbai attacks and the subsequent tension between Pakistan and India, the United Jihad Council has decided to remain silent,” said a commander of one of the UJC member organisations, requesting anonymity. He said the incumbent Pakistani rulers were pursuing the same policy adopted by Pervez Musharraf and the statements on Kashmir issued so far by President Asif Zardari had made it clear that the present Pakistan government would extend no support to the Kashmiri freedom fighters. “In the current situation, the UJC is maintaining complete silence and has no contact with any Pakistani organisation or institution,” the UJC commander said. “The outfits banned in Pakistan, including the Lashkar-e-Taiba, have never worked with the UJC nor maintained with it any direct or indirect contact,” he added while claiming that that they were fighting for the liberation of occupied Jammu and Kashmir and their struggle would continue. Since the government launched a crackdown against Jamaat-ul-Dawah and started sealing its offices across Pakistan and Azad Kashmir, all the central leaders of the UJC have been maintaining a low profile and have removed signboards from temporary sub-offices of the organisations in various districts of Azad Kashmir. When The News contacted Foreign Office spokesman Muhammad Sadiq, he said there was no change in Pakistan’s Kashmir policy. He said Pakistan supported the just struggle of Kashmiris for their right to self-determination but no authority in Pakistan had any links with militant or political organisations operating in occupied Kashmir. The UJC was formed in the summer of 1994 by amalgamation of several armed resistance organisations. It is currently headed by Syed Salahuddin, the leader of Hizbul Mujahideen, the largest group operating in the occupied Jammu and Kashmir. This organisation was created to unify and focus efforts of various armed resistance groups fighting the Indian rule in Kashmir. This made distribution of resources like arms, ammunition, propaganda materials and communication more streamlined. It also made it easier to coordinate and pool resources of various Jihadi groups to collect information, plan operations and strike at targets of military importance in the Indian occupied Kashmir. REFERENCE: Major Jihadi groups disappear Mazhar Tufail Saturday, December 13, 2008 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=18922&Cat=13&dt=12/13/2008

Live with Talat on Mumbai Tragedy - 4 (AAJ TV 2009)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXPdpNs-VTs


Pakistan fails to act on Ajmal Kasab’s letter Amir Mir Monday, January 05, 2009 LAHORE: The Pakistan government is in a fix as to how to react to the letter written by Ajmal Kasab, the lone Mumbai attacker captured alive by the Indian security forces, wherein he had claimed to be a Pakistani belonging to a Faridkot village and a Lashkar-e-Taiba operative who killed many people on November 26 in Mumbai. The Indians had provided Kasab’s letter as well as his confessional statement to the Pakistani authorities on December 23, saying he wanted legal assistance from Islamabad before his police remand comes to an end on January 6. The Pakistani foreign office had confirmed receiving Kasab’s letter the same day, saying it was forwarded to the Pakistani High Commission in Delhi by the Indian authorities. Ten days later, however, the interior ministry and the foreign office circles say they are still examining the letter besides trying to ascertain if Kasab was actually a Pakistani national. The covering letter containing Kasab’s request to Islamabad for legal assistance said that the Mumbai Crime Branch eagerly awaits a response from the Pakistan Consulate General in Delhi before it starts looking for other legal options for Ajmal Amir Kasab. The covering memo further states, since Ajmal Kasab has already confessed to his crime in the letter dispatched to Pakistani High Commission [in New Delhi], Pakistan should inform the Indian High Commission in Islamabad as early as possible whether or not it wants to provide legal assistance to Kasab. However, interior ministry sources say the National Data Registration Authority (NADRA) does not verify Kasab’s claim of being a Pakistani national as it lacks official data to prove his assertion. But they added that the Pakistani authorities have not yet concluded their investigations into Kasab’s claim and they would respond to his request shortly.

However, the foreign ministry sources in Islamabad do not take Ajmal’s letter or his confessional statement seriously, saying the confessions of a prisoner cannot be treated as ample proof. “The Indian authorities should produce some credible evidence to establish Kasab’s identity since some Indian papers have already reported that Kasab is in fact an Indian national”, said a foreign office source while requesting anonymity. Even otherwise, he added, Kasab’s statement does not amount to admissible proof under any penal code anywhere in the world, including India or Pakistan. In his confessional statement provided to the Pakistani authorities, which has already appeared in several Indian newspapers, Kasab gave a detailed account of his training, his trainers, his role in the terror strike as well as the role of nine other LT militants in the Mumbai attacks. Kasab has further requested the Pakistani high commission to claim the body of his colleague Abu Ismail who was with him during the operation, and take it for burial to Pakistan. Although Kasab has mentioned about the death of nine other LT operatives, he has specifically written about the death of his fast friend Ismail. Citing Ajmal’s letter, the Mumbai Crime Branch has reportedly written a separate letter to the Pakistani High Commission in Delhi, asking it to claim the bodies of the nine Pakistani nationals. However, the Pakistani authorities have not yet responded to any of these letters.

In his confessional statement which Ajmal Kasab allegedly gave to the Mumbai police and which has already been published by Indian newspapers Hindu and Daily News & Analysis, he has stated: “I had been residing in Faridkot in Okara district of the Pakistani Punjab since my birth and I studied up to class IV in a government school there. In year 2000, however, I left the school and went to stay with my brother in Tohid Abad Mohalla, near Minar-e-Pakistan in Lahore. I worked as a labourer at various places till 2005, visiting my native place once in a while. In 2005, I had a quarrel with my father. I left home and went to Data Darbar in Lahore, where boys who run away from home are given shelter. The boys are sent to different places for employment”. The statement added: “One day, a person named Shafiq came there and took me with him. He was from Jehlum and had a catering business. I started working for him for Rs120 per day. Later, my salary was increased to Rs200 a day. I worked with him till 2007. While working with Shafiq, I came in contact with Muzaffar Lal Khan, 22... Since we were not getting enough money, we decided to carry out robbery to make big money. So we quit the job and went to Rawalpindi, where we rented a flat. Afzal had located a house for us to loot... We required some firearms for our mission... While we were in search of firearms, we saw some LT stalls at Raja Bazaar in Rawalpindi on the day of Eidul Azha. We then realised that even if we procured firearms, we would not be able to operate them. Therefore, we decided to join LeT for weapons training.

“We reached the LT office and told a person there we wanted to join the LT. He noted down our names and addresses and told us to come the next day. The next day, there was another person with him. He gave us Rs200 and some receipts. Then he gave us the address of a place called Markaz-e-Toiba, Muridke, and told us to go there. It was a LeT training camp. We went to the place by bus and showed the receipts at the gate of the camp. We were allowed inside... Then we were taken to the actual camp area. Initially, we were selected for a 21-day training course called Daura Aam. From the next day, our training started... After Daura Aam, we were selected for another training programme, which was also for 21 days. We were taken to Mansehra in Buttal village, where we were trained in handling weapons....

“After that, we were told that we will begin the next stage involving advanced training. We were taken to a LT camp in Shaiwai Nala near Muzaffarabad for advanced training... We were then taken to Chela Bandi Pahari area for a training programme, called Daura Khaas, of three months. It involved handling weapons, using hand grenades, rocket launchers and mortars... There were 32 trainees in the camp of whom 16 were selected for a confidential operation by one Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi alias Chacha. But three of them ran away from the camp. Chacha sent the remaining 13 with a person called Kafa to the Muridke camp again. At the Muridke camp, we were taught swimming and made familiar with the life of fishermen at sea. We were given lectures on the working of Indian security agencies. We were shown clippings highlighting atrocities on Muslims in India. After the training, we were allowed to go to our native places. I stayed with my family for seven days. I then went to the LT camp at Muzaffarabad.

“After the training Chacha selected 10 of us and formed five teams of two people each on September 15.... The date fixed for the operation was September 27. However, the operation was cancelled for some reason. We stayed in Karachi till November 23 and then left from Azizabad in Karachi, along with Zaki and Kafa. We were taken to the nearby seashore... We boarded a launch. After travelling for 22 to 25 nautical miles we boarded a bigger launch. Again, after a journey of an hour, we boarded a ship, Al-Huseini, in the deep sea. While boarding the ship, each of us was given a sack containing eight grenades, an AK-47 rifle, 200 cartridges, two magazines and a cell phone. “Then we started towards the Indian coast. When we reached Indian waters, the crew members of Al-Huseini hijacked an Indian launch. The crew of the launch was shifted to Al-Huseini. We then boarded the launch. An Indian seaman was made to accompany us at gunpoint; he was made to bring us to the Indian coast. After a journey of three days, we reached near Mumbai’s shore. While we were still some distance away from the shore, Ismail and Asadulla killed the Indian seaman in the basement of the launch. Then we boarded an inflatable dinghy and reached Badhwar Park jetty. “I then went along with Ismail to VT station by taxi. After reaching the hall of the station, we went to the toilet, took out the weapons from our sacks, loaded them, came out of the toilet and started firing indiscriminately at passengers. Suddenly, a police officer opened fire at us. We threw hand grenades towards him and also opened fire at him. Then we went inside the station threatening the commuters and randomly firing at them. We then came out of the railway station searching for a building with a roof. But we did not find one. Therefore, we entered a lane. We entered a building and went upstairs. On the third and fourth floors we searched for hostages but we found that the building was a hospital and not a residential building. We started to come down. That is when policemen started firing at us. We threw grenades at them...

“A bullet hit my hand and my AK-47 fell out of my hand. When I bent to pick it up another bullet hit me on the same hand... Ismail was injured in the firing too. The police removed us from the vehicle and took us to a hospital where I came to know that Ismail had succumbed to injuries. My statement has been read to me and explained in Hindi and it has been correctly recorded”, concludes Ajmal Kasab in his alleged confessional statement published by some Indian newspapers. A sympathizer of Lashkar-e-Taiba, however, told The News that alleged confessional statement by Ajmal Kasab was cooked up by Indian agencies to defame the LT, which is engaged in legitimate struggle. He said New Delhi attempted to kill two birds with one stone by concocting this statement. One the one hand it wanted to embarrass the Pakistani government and on the other hand it desired to harm Kashmir freedom movement. REFERENCE: Pakistan fails to act on Ajmal Kasab’s letter Amir Mir Monday, January 05, 2009


Live with Talat on Mumbai Tragedy - 5 (AAJ TV 2009)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUPbLuGoBww

National security adviser sacked Mariana Baabar Thursday, January 08, 2009  ISLAMABAD: The government has finally admitted that Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving gunman of the November attacks in Mumbai, is a Pakistani national. The Foreign Office spokesman, who is currently in Kabul said, “According to our preliminary investigations, Ajmal Kasab is a Pakistani national. Our investigations are continuing.” Coming on the heels of this admission, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani sacked his National Security Adviser Major General (retd) Mehmud Ali Durrani for giving a statement on Ajmal Kasab without taking him into confidence. Before the formal announcement, Prime Minister Gilani told Geo News on telephone that Durrani had given a statement to an Indian news channel regarding Ajmal Kasab without taking him into confidence.

The prime minister said that Durrani’s statement had tarnished the country’s image. “So I decided to sack him,” he told Geo News. Earlier, the Foreign Office was reluctant to confirm the report with even Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir denying Kasab’s nationality in an interview to an Indian TV channel. His ministry was only willing to do so after other senior officials and ministers from other ministries came out in the open and confirmed Kasab’s nationality when asked by the foreign news agencies. Confusion reigned supreme in Pakistan on Wednesday evening with several official voices speaking at the same time, but ensuring that they were not on the same page regarding the nationality of Ajmal Kasab. These officials proved to the world that they were strangers to ‘coordination’, and nobody knew who was in charge.

As far as Kasab’s nationality is concerned it was the Ministry of Information that had the final word in interaction with AP and Reuters where Information Minister Sherry Rehman confirmed that Ajmal Kasab was a Pakistani national. Later, state-run television carried the version of the minister. In the end the Foreign Office was left with no choice but to agree. What has emerged very clearly is that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was very much out of the loop on Wednesday and decisions and announcements were made elsewhere with a clueless and embarrassed Foreign Office shaking its head in disbelief.

“I really do not know what is happening and this is certainly a very sad state of affairs. I myself am confused. We are trying to get through to the spokesman who is in Kabul,” one frustrated official at the Foreign Office told The News. Earlier, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs wanted to have the final say when the National Security Adviser, Maj Gen (retd) Mehmood Durrani, was quoted as saying that Ajmal Kasab was very much a Pakistani citizen while the Foreign Office rebutted this and sent out a one liner from Kabul saying, “investigations to determine the nationality of Ajamal Kasab are still in progress, it is still premature to say anything in this regard — and the information given to us by India is being ‘seriously’ examined.”

The Foreign Office spokesman, who is ambassador-designate to Afghanistan, is still in Kabul and in his absence the national security adviser, Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir and Information Minister Sherry Rehman talked to the foreign media, including India. This is something Durrani and Bashir are reluctant to do where the Pakistani media is concerned. Durrani was quoted by the Indian media as saying that the identity of Kasab had been established and he was a Pakistani while Bashir was at pains to tell the Indian media that investigations were still continuing.

This led to a media circus where reports were being updated every hour, something not seen before in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs whose statements are taken as the Gospel truth. Earlier, a few weeks ago, the spokesman had stated that they were still examining the letter written to them allegedly by Kasab and they would soon issue a statement regarding the decision that the government would take. The spokesman had issued a statement early in the afternoon and referred to different reports that had appeared, and said that the information received from India is being ‘seriously’ examined. “Pakistan remains fully determined in its investigations to uncover full facts pertaining to the Mumbai incident and is cognizant of the need for establishing legally tenable evidence.”

“Pakistan regrets the propaganda campaign unleashed by India to malign the country. Blame game and political point scoring is counterproductive and unacceptable. “Terrorism is a pernicious problem afflicting South Asia. Pragmatic and responsible approach, including cooperation between the relevant investigation departments, is the imperative need of the hour to deal with the Mumbai terrorist attacks and to prevent any such incident in India, Pakistan or elsewhere.” The morning papers had quoted ISI chief Lt Gen Ahmad Shuja Pasha as saying, “We may be crazy in Pakistan but not completely out of our minds”. The different ministries in Pakistan should rephrase this to say, “We are all crazy in Pakistan and completely out of our minds.” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs would certainly agree. REFERENCE: National security adviser sacked Mariana Baabar Thursday, January 08, 2009 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=19476&Cat=13&dt=1/8/2009

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Munir Akram, Marijana Mihic & Shame in Manhattan.


Despite killing Osama bin Laden, and other hawkish exploits, President Obama remains vulnerable to Republican assertions of foreign policy weakness. Another major military success could revive Obama’s flagging poll numbers. Until recently, most analysts thought a US-Israeli attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities may serve this purpose. But the Iranians will react strongly, directly and asymmetrically to such an attack. After the events of 2011, American strategists may see Pakistan as a far ‘softer’ target. It is uncertain if either the US or Pakistan has fully thought through the potential consequences of their possible military confrontation. Whatever its weaknesses, Pakistan will be compelled by national sentiment to respond to another US attack or intervention across its borders. A limited ‘engagement’ could escalate rapidly into wide-ranging hostilities. If, during such a crisis, Pakistan’s strategic command believes that the US military strike is aimed to capture or destroy its nuclear and delivery capabilities, it may feel compelled to use rather than lose these capabilities. To avoid such a miscalculation, Pakistan’s new nuclear deterrence doctrine, aimed to deter aggression from not only India but also from other sources, needs to be clearly and publicly spelt out. The apocalyptic danger of a military conflict between two (albeit unequal) nuclear powers should be addressed urgently by the international community. The US-Nato should accept the measures Pakistan has proposed to avoid another shooting exchange. The US cannot continue to claim the right to strike at will within Pakistan’s territory without Pakistan’s concurrence. REFERENCE: Shame in Chicago From the Newspaper | Munir Akram | 27th May, 2012 http://dawn.com/2012/05/27/shame-in-chicago/ 


Reference: Monday 03/03/2003 Ambassador to the United Nations for Pakistan Munir Akram examines the arrest of a key Al Qaeda operative in Pakistan. https://charlierose.com/videos/13921




WAY BACK IN 2003: The United States has given Pakistan until Friday to decide whether it will waive the diplomatic immunity of its U.N. ambassador, Munir Akram, so that he can be prosecuted on domestic violence charges. Reached by phone at his residence, where he was spending the day, Akram declined to comment, saying, "My government is handling this. I prefer to leave it at that." The charges stem from an early morning incident on December 10 in which Marijana Mihic, 35, told police that she and Akram had argued in an apartment, and he had tried to prevent her from leaving. She described herself as Akram's girlfriend. Police said Mihic had a bruise on her head and minor abrasions on her knees. Because of the ambassador's diplomatic status, police were unable to arrest Akram. A spokesman for the Manhattan district attorney said if diplomatic immunity were lifted, "We would be prepared to arrest" the ambassador. Meanwhile, the Pakistani mission is trying to downplay the incident, calling it a "momentary misunderstanding." "No charges were filed, and no charges have been filed," said Mansoor Suhail, a spokesman for Akram. "The ambassador as well as his friend both strongly believe there is no basis for any legal action. The whole thing is being blown out of proportion. It was a telephone call and as soon as the police arrived, she said, 'Sorry, I don't want to file charges.'" The Pakistani Foreign Ministry said it is conducting an inquiry into the incident. REFERENCE: Pakistan ambassador in assault row January 08, 2003|CNN U.N. Producer Liz Neisloss and Producer Ronni Berke http://articles.cnn.com/2003-01-08/world/pakistan.ambassador_1_pakistan-ambassador-diplomatic-immunity-charges?_s=PM:asiapcf
Munir Akram on India-Pakistan Relations

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTPnmn8cbcY


2009: ISLAMABAD: The government has finally admitted that Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving gunman of the November attacks in Mumbai, is a Pakistani national. The Foreign Office spokesman, who is currently in Kabul said, “According to our preliminary investigations, Ajmal Kasab is a Pakistani national. Our investigations are continuing.” Coming on the heels of this admission, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani sacked his National Security Adviser Major General (retd) Mehmud Ali Durrani for giving a statement on Ajmal Kasab without taking him into confidence. Before the formal announcement, Prime Minister Gilani told Geo News on telephone that Durrani had given a statement to an Indian news channel regarding Ajmal Kasab without taking him into confidence. The prime minister said that Durrani’s statement had tarnished the country’s image. “So I decided to sack him,” he told Geo News. Earlier, the Foreign Office was reluctant to confirm the report with even Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir denying Kasab’s nationality in an interview to an Indian TV channel. His ministry was only willing to do so after other senior officials and ministers from other ministries came out in the open and confirmed Kasab’s nationality when asked by the foreign news agencies. Confusion reigned supreme in Pakistan on Wednesday evening with several official voices speaking at the same time, but ensuring that they were not on the same page regarding the nationality of Ajmal Kasab. These officials proved to the world that they were strangers to ‘coordination’, and nobody knew who was in charge. As far as Kasab’s nationality is concerned it was the Ministry of Information that had the final word in interaction with AP and Reuters where Information Minister Sherry Rehman confirmed that Ajmal Kasab was a Pakistani national. Later, state-run television carried the version of the minister. In the end the Foreign Office was left with no choice but to agree. What has emerged very clearly is that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was very much out of the loop on Wednesday and decisions and announcements were made elsewhere with a clueless and embarrassed Foreign Office shaking its head in disbelief. “I really do not know what is happening and this is certainly a very sad state of affairs. I myself am confused. We are trying to get through to the spokesman who is in Kabul,” one frustrated official at the Foreign Office told The News. Earlier, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs wanted to have the final say when the National Security Adviser, Maj Gen (retd) Mehmood Durrani, was quoted as saying that Ajmal Kasab was very much a Pakistani citizen while the Foreign Office rebutted this and sent out a one liner from Kabul saying, “investigations to determine the nationality of Ajamal Kasab are still in progress, it is still premature to say anything in this regard — and the information given to us by India is being ‘seriously’ examined.” The Foreign Office spokesman, who is ambassador-designate to Afghanistan, is still in Kabul and in his absence the national security adviser, Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir and Information Minister Sherry Rehman talked to the foreign media, including India. This is something Durrani and Bashir are reluctant to do where the Pakistani media is concerned. Durrani was quoted by the Indian media as saying that the identity of Kasab had been established and he was a Pakistani while Bashir was at pains to tell the Indian media that investigations were still continuing. This led to a media circus where reports were being updated every hour, something not seen before in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs whose statements are taken as the Gospel truth. Earlier, a few weeks ago, the spokesman had stated that they were still examining the letter written to them allegedly by Kasab and they would soon issue a statement regarding the decision that the government would take. The spokesman had issued a statement early in the afternoon and referred to different reports that had appeared, and said that the information received from India is being ‘seriously’ examined. “Pakistan remains fully determined in its investigations to uncover full facts pertaining to the Mumbai incident and is cognizant of the need for establishing legally tenable evidence.” “Pakistan regrets the propaganda campaign unleashed by India to malign the country. Blame game and political point scoring is counterproductive and unacceptable. “Terrorism is a pernicious problem afflicting South Asia. Pragmatic and responsible approach, including cooperation between the relevant investigation departments, is the imperative need of the hour to deal with the Mumbai terrorist attacks and to prevent any such incident in India, Pakistan or elsewhere.” The morning papers had quoted ISI chief Lt Gen Ahmad Shuja Pasha as saying, “We may be crazy in Pakistan but not completely out of our minds”. The different ministries in Pakistan should rephrase this to say, “We are all crazy in Pakistan and completely out of our minds.” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs would certainly agree. REFERENCE: National security adviser sacked Mariana Baabar Thursday, January 08, 2009 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=19476&Cat=13&dt=1/8/2009

2003: ISLAMABAD, Jan 9: Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Munir Akram, is likely to be recalled due to charges of domestic violence against him that were reported in the US media on Wednesday. A decision in this regard is expected soon, Dawn learnt through well-placed government sources on Thursday. “Even if it was largely a weak case, Pakistan government will not let an individual, no matter how competent, hamper Pakistan’s presence at the United Nations,” said a senior government official, adding: “This is likely to be, even if tragic, an open-and-shut case.” Talking to officials at the ministry of foreign affairs and other relevant government agencies it transpired that Islamabad does not want to allow a simple, unfortunate case acquire a propaganda proportion in an already difficult, if not hostile, diplomatic milieu. “Anything potentially embarrassing for the government will be nipped in the bud,” was the view of a former diplomat. While most of the senior officials contacted by Dawn on Thursday remained tightlipped on the fate of Pakistan’s UN representative, they reckoned the gravity of the matter. Maintaining that there was a strong possibility of Munir Akram being recalled from his present post, one official said: “It is not just a question of right or wrong, but there is also a very strong operational aspect to the whole incident.” “He (Munir Akram) is a fighter and media intrusion will not affect him one bit,” argued one officer at the foreign office who has worked with Akram for almost a decade. “Given Munir Akram’s tremendous contribution to the country one hopes that he will be allowed to continue in his present position as an effective representative of Pakistan at the United Nations,” he added. When asked if Pakistan had responded to the US State Department’s request for waiver of diplomatic immunity of Pakistan’s envoy, a senior official said it was a very serious matter, indicating that Islamabad would not allow that. REFERENCE: Pakistan may recall Munir By Our Staff Reporter January 10, 2003 Friday Ziqa’ad 6, 1423 http://archives.dawn.com/2003/01/10/top12.htm

Charlie Rose - A conversation about Indian-Pakistani relations with Munir Akram



Culture Center - Ambassador Munir Akram - 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK-OTh4oxqM
The Real History and Facts which Munir Akram criminally ignored rather hide: Taliban are Pak Army proxies, not Pashtun nationalists - I By Farhat Taj March 30 - April 05, 2012 - Vol. XXIV, No. 07 http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta2/tft/article.php?issue=20120330&page=8 Taliban are Pak Army proxies, not Pashtun nationalists - II By Farhat Taj April 06-12, 2012 - Vol. XXIV, No. 08 http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta2/tft/article.php?issue=20120406&page=6 Taliban are Pak Army proxies, not Pashtun nationalists - III By Farhat Taj April 20-26, 2012 - Vol. XXIV, No. 10 http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/tft/article.php?issue=20120420&page=6 Taliban are Pak Army proxies, not Pashtun nationalists - IV By Farhat Taj April 27 - May 03, 2012 - Vol. XXIV, No. 11 http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/tft/article.php?issue=20120427&page=6 Taliban are Pak Army proxies, not Pashtun nationalists - V By Farhat Taj May 04-10, 2012 - Vol. XXIV, No. 12 http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/tft/article.php?issue=20120504&page=4 Taliban are Pak Army proxies, not Pashtun nationalists – by Farhat Taj http://pakistanblogzine.wordpress.com/2012/05/17/taliban-are-pak-army-proxies-not-pashtun-nationalists-by-farhat-taj/

2003: NEW YORK, Jan 8: The US State Department has asked Pakistan to withdraw diplomatic immunity of its Ambassador Munir Akram at the world body following a request by the New York City’s prosecutors office. The City’s prosecutors want to investigate a month-old assault charges filed against him by a woman friend, who has since recanted her story. Marijana Mihic, 35, has withdrawn the charges and met the New York City’s district attorney’s officials pleading that the case not be pursued. The New York Times in a report on Wednesday acknowledged that the legal dispute came at a bad time for the ambassador. On Jan 1, Pakistan took a seat on the 15-nation Security Council for a two-year term, just when the Council would be weighing whether to authorize war on Iraq. A spokesman for the Pakistan Mission expressed surprise that the paper like the New York Times had decided to run the report when no charges had been filed. “The ambassador and his friend both strongly believe that there is no basis for any legal action in this matter,” said Spokesman Mansoor Suhail. “And they have both communicated that belief to the concerned authorities.” The spokesman noted that a “trivial matter has been blown up into an issue” when both parties had communicated that belief to the authorities. A spokesman for the ministry of foreign affairs said that the ministry was investigating the incident “which appears to have been based on some misunderstanding”. On completion of this process, further appropriate action would be taken, he added. Diplomats here speculate that Mr Akram, who is known to take tough, principled positions on issues without fear, could be undermined with reports about his personal life. Mr Akram refused to make any comments on the reports on the advice of his lawyers. However, he expressed the hope that the matter would be resolved “fairly”. AFP adds: The New York Times and The Washington Post reported on Wednesday that the US request stemmed from a Dec 10 incident in which the New York police were called to Mr Akram’s home by a woman who alleged the envoy had beaten her. The woman told the police that Mr Akram had smashed her head into a wall, that her arm hurt and that he had hit her before, according to the newspaper accounts. REFERENCE: Pakistan asked to withdraw immunity of its UN envoy By Masood Haider January 9, 2003 Thursday Ziqa’ad 5, 1423 http://archives.dawn.com/2003/01/09/top10.htm


Culture Center - Ambassador Munir Akram - 2



2003 WASHINGTON, Jan 9: The State Department said on Wednesday it wanted the US legal system to complete its procedure in the complaint against Pakistan’s ambassador to the United Nations, Munir Akram, although the complainant was not pressing charges against him. When spokesman Richard Boucher told a briefing that the department had asked Pakistan to waive the diplomatic immunity of its ambassador, a reporter asked him why the US government was insisting on trying the ambassador when the complainant was not interested. Mr Boucher said the request to seek revocation of diplomatic immunity came from the New York police department, based on legal grounds “on what happens legally in terms of the allegations and possible legal proceedings”. “Our job is to try to get the other government to waive immunity so that those procedures can take place. So any explanations of the legal aspects of this really need to come from the local authorities,” he said. So then is it the case that any time a law enforcement official comes to the State Department and asks you to get a government to waive diplomatic immunity, you take that at face value and ask that government to do so, the reporter asked. “We trust our legal system,” Mr Boucher replied. REFERENCE: US official faces tough questions By Our Correspondent January 10, 2003 Friday Ziqa’ad 6, 1423 http://archives.dawn.com/2003/01/10/top14.htm


Ambassador Munir Akram - 1 (Columbia University International Relations Forum)



2003 The State Department has asked Pakistan to withdraw the diplomatic immunity of its envoy here, Munir Akram, after New York City prosecutors sought to bring misdemeanor assault charges against him as a result of a quarrel with a woman, United States and New York City officials said today. Marjorie Tiven, the city commissioner in charge of United Nations issues, wrote to the United States Mission here on Dec. 26 requesting that the envoy's immunity be removed, according to Edward Skyler, the mayor's spokesman. Mr. Skyler said the Manhattan district attorney's office had advised city officials that it was prepared to prosecute if Mr. Akram's immunity was lifted. Pakistan has not yet informed the United States of any decision. The legal dispute comes at a bad time for the ambassador. On Jan. 1, Pakistan took a seat on the 15-nation Security Council for a two-year term, just when the Council will be weighing whether to authorize war on Iraq. On Dec. 10 at 1:36 a.m., the New York City police were summoned by an emergency 911 call to a residence at 47 East 92nd Street in Manhattan, police officials said. Marijana Mihic, 35, told the 911 operator that a man whom she identified as her husband had smashed her head into a wall and that her arm hurt, according to the police dispatcher's notes of the conversation. She said the man had hit her before. ''Female caller states husband has diplomatic immunity,'' the dispatcher noted. When police officers arrived, Ms. Mihic said that Mr. Akram was her ''boyfriend'' and that after an argument with him she had tried to leave. ''He prevented her from leaving, he grabbed her and she fell,'' said Lt. Brian Burke, a police spokesman. The police officers at the scene reported that Ms. Mihic had a bruise on her head, he said. Mr. Akram, who is 57, was at the residence when the police arrived and identified himself as an ambassador. ''There was nothing really that the officers could do,'' Lt. Burke said. United Nations envoys enjoy immunity from local criminal prosecution. A spokesman for the Pakistani Mission said today that Mr. Akram and his friend had reconciled. ''The ambassador and his friend both strongly believe that there is no basis for any legal action in this matter,'' said Mansoor Suhail, the spokesman. ''And they have both communicated that belief to the concerned authorities.'' Once the police officers arrived at the residence, Ms. Mihic seemed to become less alarmed, and she refused medical attention when an ambulance from the city's Emergency Medical Service went to the scene, city officials said. The district attorney's office advised Ms. Tiven that Mr. Akram could be prosecuted for a misdemeanor charge of third degree assault, a law enforcement official said. She wrote to Patrick F. Kennedy, a senior diplomat at the United States mission here, and the State Department lodged its request with Pakistan on Dec. 28. REFERENCE: U.S. Asks Pakistan to Lift U.N. Envoy's Immunity After a Violent Quarrel By JULIA PRESTON Published: January 08, 2003 http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/08/world/us-asks-pakistan-to-lift-un-envoy-s-immunity-after-a-violent-quarrel.html

Ambassador Munir Akram - 2 (Columbia University International Relations Forum)



Even at the best of times, he is known to be acerbic and pungent as they come, his anti-India vitriol alarming to the uninitiated. But last month, Pakistan's UN envoy, Munir Akram, directed his bile at his live-in girlfriend and in the process earned a big, black eye for his country. His dreadful conduct took the wind out of Pakistani sails as Islamabad began its tenure as a non-permanent member of the Security Council—and just as it was gearing to deliver some good rhetorical punches there on behalf of the world's Muslims. What could be more un-Islamic than a relationship outside wedlock which under Shariah is punishable by Taliban-style retribution? Akram's stars plunged precipitously as New York's tabloids screamed details of Pakistan's "diplo-basher" and "abuser". The US State Department asked Islamabad to withdraw his diplomatic immunity so he could face criminal prosecution as a common man. The Pakistani establishment didn't know what hit them, struggling, as they were, with other difficult aspects of their tortuous relationship with Uncle Sam—border shootings and bombs dropping from American planes. They didn't need a new complication from one of their own. The famed corridors of the United Nations were suddenly abuzz with talk of Akram's physical, not verbal, violence. In Indian diplomatic circles, Munir Akram is infamous for his rabid rhetoric against New Delhi. Kashmir or nukes, Akram's visceral anti-India tirades are legion. In fact, the Brothers Akram—Munir and Zamir (who was earlier posted in India)—are known for the poisonous missiles they launch regularly at India. Munir, as spokesman of his foreign office, once called Salman Khursheed "kirai ka Muslim". But first the facts. On the morning of December 10, Akram's girlfriend, Marijana Mihic (pronounced Mariana), called the emergency 911 number at 1.36 am, asking for help. She told the police dispatcher that a man, whom she identified as her husband, had smashed her head into a wall. She said that her arm also was hurting and that he was a repeat offender. The dispatcher noted, "female caller states husband has diplomatic immunity". When the NY police arrived, guns on the ready and red light flashing, at the posh address in the upper reaches of Manhattan, Mihic changed her story a bit and said that Akram, 22 years her senior, was her "boyfriend". She had tried to leave after a heated argument but he grabbed her and she fell. Police officers noticed a bruise on her head but she declined a visit to the hospital. Akram reluctantly identified himself to the police as Pakistan's UN ambassador. The police had no choice but to leave quietly in the face of the ultimate diplomatic perk—immunity from local laws. His press spokesman, Mansoor Suhail, told Outlook: "It was a minor incident blown out of proportion by some people. They continue to be friends. There would be no basis for a legal case when there is no complaint filed." Unfortunately for Akram, the American criminal justice system works a little differently. Even if a victim doesn't file a complaint, the system can. Manhattan district attorney Robert Morgenthau is prepared to press misdemeanour assault charges once the diplomatic immunity is lifted. After all, pushing the case is none other than Majorie Tiven, the city commissioner in charge of UN, and a member of the powerful and wealthy Bloomberg family. In fact, Tiven is New York mayor Michael Bloomberg's sister and a social worker by training. On December 26, she wrote to the US mission at the UN, asking that Akram's immunity be waived. The request was forwarded to Washington, and two days later the State Department sent the summons to Pakistan. Akram has never swum rougher seas. Suhail denied there was any deadline for Islamabad to lift Akram's immunity or to even respond to the Americans.But conventional wisdom at the UN is that Pakistan has little choice but to withdraw him, because for all practical purposes, Akram is compromised. "If he doesn't go, there'll always be this Damocles' sword hanging over him. He's been rendered ineffective," said a diplomat. There's already talk that Akram would be recalled soon. Both Munir and Zamir, who is now ambassador to Nepal, have made their reputation on the one thing that serves Pakistani diplomats well—loud anti-India rhetoric. They have successfully parleyed their bellicosity to endear themselves to the army establishment. Two days after taking his post in NY, Munir Akram threatened the use of nuclear weapons against India. "India should not have the license to kill with conventional weapons while Pakistan's hands are tied regarding other means to defend itself," he said. In Geneva, he regularly accused India of harbouring the lowest of low intentions against Pakistan because it declined to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in the mid-1990s. Says G. Parthasarthy, India's former high commissioner to Pakistan: "In my view, the senior diplomats of the 1980s like Niaz Naik, Riaz Piracha, Humayun Khan and Shahryar Khan were sophisticated people who could put their view points without being abrasive." But the later crop led by the Akram brothers, Riaz Khokhar and Shamshad Ahmed went to another school, one where more bile means more clout with the army and the ISI. REFERENCE: PAKISTAN Sex, Rhetoric And Diplomatic Impunity Islamabad is hard pressed to withdraw its 'diplo-basher'. New Delhi is only too relieved. SEEMA SIROHI, AMIR MIR MAGAZINE | JAN 27, 2003 http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?218720
A conversation about Indian-Pakistani relations with Munir Akram and Fareed Zakaria in Current Affairs on Monday, June 3, 2002 http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/2523




2009: ISLAMABAD, Jan 7 Pakistani authorities, during the course of their own investigations into the Mumbai carnage, have established that the only surviving terrorist Ajmal Kasab is a Pakistani national. After a series of conflicting statements by various officials representing different sections of the government, it was officially acknowledged that DawnNews TV`s news item about the official investigation report regarding Ajmal Kasab`s identity was correct. Earlier, a high-ranking government official had told Dawn that the preliminary finding had provided enough information to conclude that the man at present in India`s custody was from a Punjab village, and perhaps belonged to a militant group that was bent upon destabilising the region by undermining the peace process. The official, who requested anonymity, said the authorities were examining all parts of the puzzle on the basis of their own investigation, as well as the information provided by India and the Americans.

However, he said there was no doubt in the minds of the investigators that the captured terrorist was a Pakistani. “Sadly, it has been established that Kasab is a Pakistani national.”

But within minutes of the revelation, confusing, and somewhat conflicting, statements started emanating from different sections of the government in Islamabad. While the Indian television channel CNN-IBN quoted Pakistan`s National Security Adviser Mehmud Ali Durrani as saying that Ajmal Kasab`s identity as a Pakistani had been established, Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir told the same channel that it was premature to say anything because the investigation was continuing.

In the midst of all this, American news agency APTN quoted Information Minister Sherry Rehman as confirming that Ajmal Kasab in fact was a Pakistani national. The minister later confirmed it to Dawn that “he is Pakistani” and that investigations are ongoing.

Similarly, the Foreign Office which at the initial stage appeared either detached from reality or completely out of the loop, admitted by broadcasting through the state-run PTV that Ajmal Kasab was indeed a Pakistani national.

During the course of Dawn`s own investigation, a number of senior officials in the interior ministry and police said that investigations were started soon after initial reports had suggested that Ajmal Kasab might be a Pakistani national. But the authorities wanted to be doubly sure about his identity because there was no record of Kasab and his family in the national database maintained by Nadra. Details of preliminary investigations submitted to the government have still not been made public.

The official who confirmed to Dawn about the preliminary investigation report said Kasab was son of Amir Kasab and Mrs Noor Illahi. But the identity of other militants killed in Mumbai is yet to be established. Senior security officials, however, said that preliminary investigations had established that the militants were operating on their own and had absolutely no link with any section of the country`s security apparatus.

A top ranking western diplomat also confirmed to Dawn that there was no linkage between the terrorists who carried out the Mumbai carnage and the Pakistani security agencies, particularly the ISI. “There is ample evidence to prove that most of the terrorists belonged to Pakistan,” the diplomat said. “But there is not even a shred of evidence to suggest that the ISI or any other Pakistani intelligence agency had any links with these terrorists,” the diplomat said.

“And this is not based on what the Pakistanis have been telling us, as we have double checked it on our own,” the diplomat added.

The remarks belie the latest claim by Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh who on Tuesday had tried to up the ante by directly accusing the Pakistani security apparatus of being involved in the Mumbai carnage. Pakistan has already rejected the Indian accusation in strongest terms.

In a related development, a statement by Prime Minister Yousuf Gilani also said the Pakistan`s investigations into the Mumbai attacks had made progress. He said that some information of an interim nature on Indian investigations had been received. He did not elaborate.

Punjab`s dusty town of Faridkot became the centre of attention soon after the deadly Mumbai attack as the Indian authorities captured Kasab and claimed that he belonged to Faridkot. The town was thronged by local and foreign media and conflicting reports came out about the identity of Kasab.

At that time the government had, for obvious reasons, decided to adopt a tight-lipped policy, maintaining that only a thorough investigation, based on concrete information, could establish whether Kasab was a Pakistani national, and a resident of Faridkot.

Answering a question about consular access to Kasab, a senior official said the militant had damaged Pakistan `like no other`. “We are not yet sure when to ask for consular access. We may not ask for it. He is involved in a heinous crime,” the official said. Kasab also wrote a letter to the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi. Pakistani authorities said they were examining the letter. REFERENCE: Ajmal`s nationality confirmed Dawn (Pakistani Newspaper). 8 January 2009 By Mubashir Zaidi http://archives.dawn.com/archives/42931


Brian Ross, Chief Investigative Correspondent, ABC News; Robert Gates, President, Texas A&M University / Former CIA Director (from College Station, TX) /// Munir Akram, Ambassador to the United Nations, Pakistan /// Herbert Muschamp, Chief Architecture Critic, The New York Times; Edward Wyatt, Metro Reporter, The New York Times. Reference: A discussion about the arrest of al-Qaeda's Khalid Shaikh Mohammed with Robert Gates and Brian Ross in Current Affairs part of Obama's Appointments on Monday, March 3, 2003 http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/2118




Why the Pakistani Military used to Support Taliban, Several Sectarian Outfits and Lashkar-e-Tayyaba before 911? And while the Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan and the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi stand officially disbanded, their most militant son and leader, Maulana Azam Tariq, an accused in several cases of sectarian killing, contested elections from jail - albeit as an independent candidate - won his seat, and was released on bail shortly thereafter. Musharraf rewrote election rules to disqualify former Prime Ministers Mohammed Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto, and threatened to toss them in jail if they returned from abroad, which badly undermined both Nawaz Sharif's Pakistan Muslim League and Bhutto's Pakistan People's Party (PPP). Musharraf has plainly given the religious groups more free rein in the campaign than he has allowed the two big parties that were his main rivals. In Jhang city, in Punjab province, Maulana Azam Tariq, leader of an outlawed extremist group called Sipah-e-Sahaba, which has been linked to numerous sectarian killings, is being allowed to run as an independent despite election laws that disqualify any candidate who has criminal charges pending, or even those who did not earn a college degree. "It makes no sense that Benazir can't run in the election," says one Islamabad-based diplomat, "and this nasty guy can."

References: And this takes me back to Pervez Musharraf’s first visit to the US after his coup. At a meeting with a group of journalists among whom I was present, my dear and much lamented friend Tahir Mirza, then the Dawn correspondent, asked Musharraf why he was not acting against Lashkar-e Tayba and Jaish-e Muhammad. Musharraf went red in the face and shot back, “They are not doing anything in Pakistan. They are doing jihad outside.” Pakistani neocons and UN sanctions Khalid Hasan This entry was posted on Sunday, December 28th, 2008 at 6:00 pm. http://www.khalidhasan.net/2008/12/28/pakistani-neocons-and-un-sanctions/ For The 'General' Good By Sairah Irshad Khan Monthly Newsline January 2003  http://www.newslinemagazine.com/2003/01/for-the-general-good/  - General's Election By TIM MCGIRK / KHANA-KHEL Monday, Oct. 07, 2002 http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,361788,00.html - MORE DETAILS: General Musharraf, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, Brigadier [R] Usman Khalid & Deobandi Taliban. http://chagataikhan.blogspot.com/2009/02/general-musharraf-colonel-muammar.html 

Pakistan’s chief spy Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad “was in the US when the attacks occurred.” He arrived in the US on the 4th of September, a full week before the attacks. He had meetings at the State Department “after” the attacks on the WTC. But he also had “a regular visit of consultations” with his US counterparts at the CIA and the Pentagon during the week prior to September 11. REFERENCE: Cover-up or Complicity of the Bush Administration? The Role of Pakistan’s Military Intelligence (ISI) in the September 11 Attacks by Michel Chossudovsky Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG), Montréal Posted at globalresearch.ca 2 November 2001 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO111A.html


Michel Chossudovsky is Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa. TFF Associates http://www.transnational.org/SAJT/tff/people/m_chossudovsky.html

AFTER 9/11.

In the afternoon, Mahmood was invited to CIA headquarters at Langley, Virginia, where he told George Tenet, the CIA director, that in his view Mullah Omar, the Taliban chief, was a religious man with humanitarian instincts and not a man of violence! This was a bit difficult for the CIA officials to digest and rightly so as the Taliban’s track record, especially in the realm of human rights, was no secret. General Mahmood was told politely but firmly that Mullah Omar and the Taliban would have to face US Military might if Osama Bin Laden along with other Al-Qaeda leaders were not handed over without delay. To send the message across clearly, Richard Armitage held a second meeting with Mahmood the same day, informing him that he would soon be handed specific American demands, to which Mahmood reiterated that Pakistan would cooperate. {Bush at War by Bob Woodward, published by Simon & Schuster, 2002, New York}, p 32. {Pakistan: Eye of the Storm by Owen Bennett Jones, published by New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002}, p. 2.

General Mahmood on September 13, 2001, was handed a formal list of the US demands by Mr. Armitage and was asked to convey these to Musharraf and was also duly informed, for the sake of emphasis, that these were “not negotiable.” Colin Powell, Richard Armitage, and the assisstant secretary of state, Christina Rocca, had drafted the list in the shape of a “non-paper”. It categorically asked Pakistan:

Stop Al-Qaeda operatives coming from Afghanistan to Pakistan, intercept arms shipments through Pakistan, and end ALL logistical support for Osama Bin Laden.

Give blanket overflight and landing rights to US aircraft.

Give the US access to Pakistani Naval and Air Bases and to the border areas betweeen Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Turn over all the intelligence and immigration information.

Condemn the September 11 attacks and curb all domestic expressions of support for terrorism.

Cut off all shipments of fuel to the Talibans, and stop Pakistani volunteers from going into Afghanistan to join the Taliban. Note that, should the evidence strongly implicate Osama Bin Laden and the Al-Qaeda Network in Afghanistan, and should the Taliban continue to harbour him and his accomplices, Pakistan will break diplomatic relations with the Taliban regime, end support for the Taliban, and assist the US in the aforementioned ways to destroy Osama and his network.

Having gone through the list, Mahmood declared that he was quite clear on the subject and that “he knew how the President thought, and the President would accept these points.” {Bush at War by Bob Woodward, published by Simon & Schuster, 2002, New York}, p 58-59. Interview: Richard Armitage, “Campaign Against Terror,” PBS (Frontline), April 19, 2002}

Mahmood then faxed the document to Musharraf. While the latter was going through it and in the process of weighing the pros and cons of each demand, his aide de camp that Colin Powell was on the line. Musharraf liked and respected Powell, and the conversation was not going to be a problem. He told him that he understood and appreciated the US position, but he would respond to the US demands after having discussed these with his associates. Powell was far too polite to remind him that he in fact was the government, but did inform him that his General in Washington had already assured them that these demands would be acceptable to the government of Pakistan. {Pakistan’s Drift into Extremism : Allah, the Army, and America’s War on Terror by Hassan Abbas, published by An East Gate Book , M.E. Sharpe Armonk, New York. London, England.}. NOTES/REFERENCES - Pakistan: Eye of the Storm by Owen Bennett Jones, published by New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002. Interview: Richard Armitage, “Campaign Against Terror,” PBS (Frontline), April 19, 2002; last accessed June 2, 2003, at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/campaign/interviews/armitage.htm Bush at War by Bob Woodward, published by Simon & Schuster, 2002, New York. Pakistan’s Drift into Extremism : Allah, the Army, and America’s War on Terror by Hassan Abbas, published by An East Gate Book , M.E. Sharpe Armonk, New York. London, England

Charlie Rose - A conversation about the arrest of al-Qaeda's Khalid Shaikh Mohammed with Munir Akram




A conversation about the arrest of al-Qaeda's Khalid Shaikh Mohammed with Munir Akram in Current Affairs on Monday, March 3, 2003 http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/2120 Pakistan's ambassador to the United Nations, Munir Akram, on the arrest of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and its likely impact on the broader war on terror.




For example, after the 9/11, the former JI Amir Qazi Hussain Ahmad stated that al-Qaeda was a figment of the Americans’ imagination. On the contrary, the then JI Secretary General Syed Munawar Hassan, the current chief of the party, said that al-Qaeda leaders were our brethren (Nawa-i-Waqt, October 13, 2002). Commenting on these statements, Prof. Ahmad said: ‘There is no contradiction between the two. The Muslims in al-Qaeda are our brethren. They should be punished if they are criminals!’ He sounded mightily reluctant to hold Al-Qaeda responsible for 9/11. He even refused to give any credence to Gulbadeen Hikmatyar’s statement that Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11. (It may be added here that Hikmatyar is Jamaat-i-Islami’s favorite Afghan leader.) Instead, he finds “dozens of scholarly books” casting doubt on the official version more credible. REFERENCE: The Muslims in al-Qaeda are our brethren, says the top Jamaat-i-Islami ideologue Prof. Khurshid Ahmad Dec 16th, 2010 By Shakil Chaudhary and Mohammad Shehzad http://www.pol-dev.com/?p=678

Jamaat-i-Islami ideologue Prof. Khurshid Ahmad - 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqZDGxRx1pQ


He justified the two-nation theory saying, the Hindus and the Muslims coexisted peacefully only under the Muslim rule and such an existence was otherwise impossible. ‘The colonial rule divided the Hindus and the Muslims…that resulted in the 1947 riots!’ He admitted that during the last 15-20 years, the Pakistani society had become increasingly intolerant. He conceded that the blasphemy laws were being misused, but he did not favor amending them. ‘The punishment for blasphemy is death – in Christianity, the Old Testament, the New Testament, the Quran and the precepts of the Holy Prophet Mohammad.’ The blasphemy does not apply to serious academic debate, he said. ‘It applies only to derogatory remarks.’ He dismissed the argument that the Barelvis consider the Deobandis and the Ahl-i-Hadith blasphemers. On the Kashmir jihad, Prof. Ahmad said that the JI has no organizational relationship with the Hizbul Mujahideen. ‘But of course, we do meet and whatever the Hizb is doing, it is its fundamental right.’ The JI India and JI Pakistan have different ideas on certain issues such as Kashmir though the source of inspiration for them was the same. He justified it saying that they became different and independent organization after the partition because the political situation had changed. He said that Israel was an illegitimate country, but did not support the annihilation of the Israeli Jews. In fact, he supported the idea of a single state in which the Jews and the Palestinians live together. He acknowledged that the US and NATO played some positive role in the Balkans, but they allowed the massacre of the Muslims to continue. Their intervention was aimed at preventing the revival of Islamic movements there. REFERENCE: The Muslims in al-Qaeda are our brethren, says the top Jamaat-i-Islami ideologue Prof. Khurshid Ahmad Dec 16th, 2010 By Shakil Chaudhary and Mohammad Shehzad http://www.pol-dev.com/?p=678

Jamaat-i-Islami ideologue Prof. Khurshid Ahmad - 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sSaxB-45B0

Jamat-e-Islami Links with Al-Qaeda


Terror mastermind captured – Terror mastermind captured – Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is thought to be the man who masterminded the attacks on 11 September. His capture in Pakistan was seen as a key success in the US fight to counter al-Qaeda. BBC News Online presents key video reports following the arrest. Tuesday, 4 March, 2003, 22:56 GMT  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/2820179.stm  - KARACHI – Under immense pressure from the United States, a slow and gradual operation has begun in Pakistan against the strongest political voice of Islamists and the real mother of international Islamic movements, of which Osama bin Laden’s International Islamic Front is the spoiled child. In a surprise move this week, Pakistan’s federal minister of the interior, Faisal Saleh Hayat, listed a number of incidences in which members of the Jamaat-i-Islami (JI), the premier fundamentalist party in the country, had been tied to al-Qaeda, and called on it to “explain these links”. “It is a matter of concern that Jamaat-e-Islami, which is a main faction of the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal [MMA], has neither dissociated itself from its activists having links with the al-Qaeda network nor condemned their activities,” Faisal said, adding that “one could derive a meaning out of its silence”. The MMA is an alliance of six religious parties that gained unprecedented electoral victories in national elections in 2002. One of its members is the leader of the opposition in the Lower House, while the MMA controls the provincial government in North West Frontier Province. It also forms part of a coalition government in Balochistan province. The MMA has 67 seats in the 342-seat National Assembly, with just under a third of them held by the JI. Asia Times Online predicted that the JI would be targeted (Jihadi’s arrest a small step for Pakistan , Aug 10) and now contacts confirm that moves have already started against associates of the JI in its strongest political constituency, Karachi. The next phase will most likely be in Rawalpindi and southern Punjab. Several close affiliates are believed to have been arrested by the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) without charges being laid against them. Pakistan turns on itself By Syed Saleem Shahzad Aug 19, 2004  http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/FH19Df05.html  Khalid: A test for US credibility By Syed Saleem Shahzad Mar 6, 2003  http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/EC06Df04.html  Profile: Al-Qaeda ‘kingpin’ Page last updated at 14:04 GMT, Friday, 13 November 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2811855.stm http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-12964158 ‘THE MASTERMIND’ For smug KSM, federal court could be perfect arena By Peter Finn Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, November 14, 2009 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/11/13/ST2009111300917.html?sid=ST2009111300917

Jamaat-i-Islami ideologue Prof. Khurshid Ahmad - 3


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPDHeH8yphU



ISLAMABAD: One of the top security agencies on Wednesday picked up Raja Ehsan Aziz, a member of Tehrik-e-Islami (TI), for his alleged connections with terrorists who had attacked the Parade Lane Mosque in Rawalpindi and Moon Market in Lahore. Tehrik-e-Islami is a splinter group of the JI. Two female members of the Tehrik have already been taken into custody. Sarwat Wahid, another female member whose son’s car was used in the Parade Lane Mosque attack, is missing. Also her son, Jawad, who was studying in Faisalabad after doing A Level from Beacon House School System, is missing. Aziz, a graduate of Columbia University who also served on senior positions at the Foreign Office, is a retired professor of International Relations, Quaid-i-Azam University. His elder son is an Army doctor. Aziz was taken away from his house in G/10-3 on Wednesday evening by sleuths of the Counter-Terrorism Cell, his wife Amira Aziz told The News. Amira, an ex-MNA of Jamaat-e-Islami and now a Shura member of the Tehrik, is a religious scholar and writes columns in an Urdu daily. Aziz’s driver, Phool Zeb from Nowshera, has already been arrested as investigators found a mobile SIM allegedly used for conversation during the attacks on the Parade Lane Mosque and Moon Market, was issued in his name. Likewise, the car used in the mosque attack belonged to Jawad, the son of a Tehrik-e-Islami woman, Sarwat Wahid, a resident of I-8 Sector, Islamabad. Both of them are missing since then. Likewise, Aziz’ son, Omer, a student of Islamic International University, has not returned home for the last five days. JI splinter group leader, females held for links to suicide attackers Friday, December 18, 2009 By Umar Cheema http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=214063&Cat=2&dt=12/21/2009