Showing posts with label Maulana Tariq Jameel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maulana Tariq Jameel. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Kaafir Secular & Fantasies of Dr. Israr Ahmed - 4

Writing in daily Insaf (January 20, 2005) Abdullah Muntazir stated that during his long visit in India, Dr Israr Ahmad of Tanzim-e-Islami had said that the Muslims of India were doing much better than the Muslims of Pakistan and that even the IG Police of Andhra Pradesh was a Muslim. Dr Israr said that in Pakistan the maximum number of people at his lecture were 1,500 but in India they were 15,000, including 5,000 ladies. He then compared himself to the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) and said that he was not valued in Mecca but was greatly prized in Madina where he migrated. (The writer asked him to migrate to India.) Dr Israr also said that the jihad in Kashmir was not fi-sabeel Allah (in the way of Allah) as allowed by the Quran because such a jihad had to be ordained by an Islamic state. He thought only the war of the Taliban against the Muslim Northern Alliance was jihad. Dr Israr’s negation of Kashmir jihad must have offended the families of 10,000 Pakistanis martyred in Held Kashmir. Dr Israr has done other egotistical things in the past. In 1987 he wrote a book and compared himself to the Quaid-e-Azam and decided that he was a better Muslim than the Quaid. He also said that Pakistan was 40 and had now become mature. After that Pakistan mostly did immature things. But a cleric is forgiven, even having an ego like the Pharaoh’s. Writing in Nawa-e-Waqt, (January 20, 2005) Irfan Siddiqi was offended with the fikri balishtiay (intellectual Lilliputians) who said that instead of trying to fight a war with the United States the Muslims should first build the muscle for war. Irfan Siddiqi stated that these blind men did not realise that while the Muslims prepared themselves, the United States would not sit still but will advance even further, thus negating the progress of the Muslims. Hence it was not preparation that the Muslims needed but ghairat (sense of honour) which can enable one for immediate war with rusted rifles and lathis (sticks). Leave alone fighting the US with sticks and stones, the Chechen Muslims have been destroyed trying to fight the Russians with guns. The only thing to do now is that Pakistan’s top columnist should come out and make the last assault on America himself. According to daily Pakistan (January 21, 2005) although the daughter of the ex-ISI chief Hameed Gul claimed that her father had only two squares of land, the paper referred to an investigative report which gave proof that he had acquired 15 squares of land along the Indian border at a time when he was serving as a major. He ousted a number of farmers from their land who then moved the High Court. When the court decided the matter in his favour by the year 1986 he had become corps commander and was well on his way to becoming the ISI chief and many plaintiffs had begun to stand down. The title of the investigative report was: General Hameed Gul nay sainkron aikar arazi kaisay banayi (How did General Hameed Gul acquire hundreds of acres of land). The land was in Shakargarh in three villages called Adha, Auliya and Bhopa. Hameed Gul can do no wrong. His political alignments are good. His footwork with the army chiefs has been good, including with Musharraf. He has been powerful during jihad. The ISI has been split over him and may still be. * REFERENCE: SECOND OPINION: Hajj: primal therefore satisfying —Khaled Ahmed Urdu Press Review Friday, March 18, 2005 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/?page=story_18-3-2005_pg3_3


Haroon ur Rashid Praising General Pervez Musharraf Daily Jang 18 Oct 1999


Wahdat ul Wajood (Pantheism) , Dr. Israr Ahmed, Tahir ul Qadri, Deoband & Islam - 5


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC6irodDb1E

The Iranian Experience by Dr Israr Ahmad






Wahdat ul Wajood (Pantheism) , Dr. Israr Ahmed, Tahir ul Qadri, Deoband & Islam - 6


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw98MqndB7Y






Dr. Masooduddin Usmani Exposes Blasphemous Barelvis-Deobandis.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyHgH5oUPTU


Umar Bakri's fiery speeches were identical with Egyptian Umar Abdur Rehman, who had tried to blow up the Trade Centre in New York in 1993 and was in jail in the US. In Pakistan, Dr Israr was in favour of Hizbut Tahrir and wanted khilafat to replace democracy and was at times insulting to the Quaid-e-Azam. In Qaumi Digest (April 2005) he had said that Islam could not be enforced in Pakistan because of Jinnah. 'In Britain, Sheikh Umar Bakri's Khilafah, the journal of Hizbut Tahrir, attacked Jinnah as a kafir and an insult for a Muslim. Moreover it accused Jinnah of being an enemy of God and the Holy Prophet PBUH because Jinnah supported women, Christians and Hindus, and advocated democracy. Why I asked myself did they pick on Jinnah? Because, I concluded, Bakri saw him as a major ideological opponent. Significantly after the American strikes in Sudan and Afghanistan in 1998, Bakri emerged in the media to claim that he represented bin Laden in Europe' (p113). REFERENCE: The tentacles of Hizbut Tahrir - The banned group's thinking coalesces with a number of legitimate Islamist actors in Pakistan, which accounts for the spread of its influence within civil society and the army Analysis By Khaled Ahmed Return to the caliphate? August 19-25, 2011 - Vol. XXIII, No. 27 http://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta2/tft/article.php?issue=20110819&page=2

Kaafir Secular & Fantasies of Dr. Israr Ahmed - 3

Dr Israr is also moving perilously close to adopting the ‘jahiliyya’ theory that resulted in thousands of innocent Muslims being massacred in Algeria by Islamic revolutionaries on the basis of a Qutbite reinterpretation of Maududi’s thought. As a rule, the clergy doesn’t smile. It seems to have reached an ijma over keeping the face grim and eyes glaring. Only the JUI bigwigs, Maulana Fazlur Rehman and Hafiz Hussain Ahmad, seem to have realised this. If there was a penal provision against making horrible faces on TV, the moon-sighting Mufti Munibur Rehman would be in prison forever, and Dr Israr Ahmad would have to be arrested again and again for rounding on his audiences with his balefully glaring eyes. GEO (August 23, 2005) Iftikhar Ahmad in Jawabdeh, interviewed Dr Israr Ahmad who said that the political system in Pakistan was pagan (kafirana) because the recommendations of the Council for Islamic Ideology (CII) were never carried out. Those who lived in Pakistan were gunahgar (sinning) and were only ‘legal’ Muslims. They were faasiq and faajir and fundamentally hypocrites (munafiqin). He said there were hundreds of thousands of mosques but people did not enter them although there was no law forbidding them to do so. He said ulema could have done something but Western culture had prevented them. He said the British punished the Muslims because they resisted them. The Hindu was not punished because he was submissive under the Muslims and became submissive under the British too. He said Islamic change was prevented by the murder of Liaquat Ali Khan, after that Jamaat-e-Islami committed the blunder of going into politics. Jamaat was inqilabi (revolutionary) but by accepting democracy it ruined the revolution. He said he wanted to impose revolution in Pakistan and for that he was working quietly and not through violence; but blood will be spilled when his revolution came. He said he had spent 30 years teaching the Quran but was not in favour of imposing either the Saudi system or that of the Taliban. He said the Taliban had just begun Islamic legislation before they were crushed. His faith was in the advent of Imam Mehdi who had already been born in 1962. He denied that he had ever said that the Taliban would be Imam Mehdi’s army. He said after his revolution there would be khilafat through a general vote. He said no system was explained in the Quran but khilafat was the closest. He said in an Islamic state non-Muslims would be second-class citizens. He said if India decided after that to declare all Muslims second-class citizens then that would be right too. He said Muslims had fought in India on the claim that they were a different nation. There was no harm if India considered its Muslims a separate nation. If according to Dr Israr, Imam Mehdi was born in 1962, he is growing old by the day now. It is time Dr Israr called him into the open to save the endangered species called Muslims. Dr Israr is also moving perilously close to adopting the jahiliyya theory that resulted in thousands of innocent Muslims being massacred in Algeria by Islamic revolutionaries on the basis of a Qutbite reinterpretation of Maududi’s thought. Dr Israr says his revolution would be bloody; he is clearly inclined to bloodshed. Since he wants to reduce the non-Muslims to second-class citizens, he should give them the option of leaving Pakistan. In fact, after his revolution, he should give the Muslims a similar option before he starts putting them to death. Most of the Muslims will also leave rather than be ruled by his scary caliphate. REFERENCE: SECOND OPINION: Why doesn’t Dr Israr ever smile? —Khaled Ahmed’s TV Review Tuesday, October 04, 2005 http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_4-10-2005_pg3_3


Wahdat ul Wajood (Pantheism) , Dr. Israr Ahmed, Tahir ul Qadri, Deoband & Islam - 3


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMxcEQtZdZI





Lets have a look what is the reality of Ibn Arabi (The Heretic Sufi) in the light of Islamic Teaching & kindly do keep in mind that Imran Khan wants an Islamic Welfare State.

Excerpts from Iman-e-Khalis by Late. Masooduddin Usmani

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist23.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist24.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist25.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist30.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist31.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist32.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist33.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist34.htm

http://www.emanekhalis.com/emanqist1/emangist35.htm




Noted Saudi Arabian Scholar Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid says http://islamqa.info/en/ref/7691

Wahdat ul Wajood (Pantheism) , Dr. Israr Ahmed, Tahir ul Qadri, Deoband & Islam - 4


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zXI8qFFwNE

The Iranian Experience by Dr Israr Ahmad







Mawdudi’s works began to appear in Iran in the 1960s. They were translated into Persian from Arabic by Ayatollah Hadi Khusrawshahi and members of a translating team working with him. Articles on Mawdudi and excerpts from his works also appeared in various issues of Khusrawshahi’s journal Maktab-i Islam. Following the revolution of 1978–1979, a number of Mawdudi’s works were translated into Persian from Arabic by Ayatollah Sayyid Muhammad Khamana’i. Interestingly, the first Persian translation of a work of Mawdudi was done in Hyderabad, Deccan, by Mahmud Faruqi in 1946; RJI, vol. 4, 90. REFERENCES: The Vangaurd of the Islamic Revolution - The Jama‘at-i Islami of Pakistan Seyed Vali Reza Nasr UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · London © 1994 The Regents of the University of California - Should we just condemn only Khomeini and condone Mawdudi knowing well that Mawdudi was a close friend of Khomeini and was sympathetic to his course. In a book titled, 'Two brothers - Maududi and Khomeini' page 129, the following statement of Dr Ahmad Farouk Maududi (son of Abul-A'ala Maududi) was published in Roz Naame, Lahore - 29 September 1979, "Allama Khomeini had a very old and close relationship with Abba Jaan (father). Aayaatullah Khomeini translated his (fathers) books in Farsi and included it as a subject in Qum. Allama Khomeini met my father in 1963 during Hajj and my father's wish was to create a revolutionary in Pakistan similar to Iran. He was concerned about the success of the Iranian revolution till his last breath.'

Kaafir Secular & Fantasies of Dr. Israr Ahmed - 2

ISLAMABAD: The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has deported dozens of the disciples of noted scholar Dr Israr Ahmad for holding Dars-e-Qur’aan sessions in Dubai, fearing the spread of Talibanisation in the country. The UAE government has also set a deadline for several other Pakistani families to close their businesses and leave the country after it found them involved in religious activities. The Pakistan’s consulate in Dubai is reluctant to share details with the media on the subject. However, the Foreign Office spokeswoman confirmed the deportations. “They violated the laws,” FO spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam told The News but added that she had no knowledge of the exact numbers of the deportees. According to her account, private religious congregations are not allowed there. Religious gatherings could not be held in Dubai except for the Friday sermon, said a source, adding that the Dars-e-Qur’aan congregation was a private function. The News has learnt that the Dubai police arrested around 70 Pakistanis for attending the congregation. The majority of them are believed to be the disciples of Dr Israr Ahmad. About 30 of them have been deported, while the rest have been directed to wind up their businesses and leave the country by the end of July, Bakhtiyar Khilji, chief administrator of Tanzeem-e-Islami - the party headed by Dr Israr Ahmad - told The News. Khilji feared that this “crackdown” by the UAE government might lead to an en masse deportation of Dr Israr’s followers. “The UAE government happens to be very sensitive to such congregations. The police had arrested the people whenever suspicion of their participants to the Dars-e-Qur’aan congregation arose.” When this correspondent contacted Pakistan consulate in Dubai, Dr Zafar Iqbal, press consular, showed reluctance to share the details, saying it could trigger a controversy. Waseem Ahmad, welfare attache at the consulate, who was directly involved in this issue, also refused to speak on the subject. REFERENCE: UAE deports Pakistanis for Dars-e-Qur’aan Friday, May 11, 2007 http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=55384&Cat=6&dt=5/11/2007


Dr. Israr Ahmed & Wahabis


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qF_Ws1RGgTE

Aqeedah Ibn ‘Arabi wa Hayaatuhu by Taqiy al-Deen al-Faasi


Some confusing words of Ibn ‘Arabi were mentioned to our master Shaykh al-Islam Siraaj al-Deen al-Balqeeni, and he was asked about Ibn ‘Arabi. Our Shaykh al-Balqeeni said: he is a kaafir.[Ibn-e-Hajar Asqalani]

Among these Sufis are: Ibn ‘Arabi, Ibn Saba’een, Ibn Barrajaan and their followers who follow their path and their religion. They have many books in circulation that are filled with blatant kufr and repugnant bid’ahs, trying to interpret clear texts in very far-fetched and repugnant ways, such that the reader is astounded that anyone could attribute such things to Islam. [Ibn Khaldoon]

These later Sufis, such as Ibn ‘Arabi and his followers, are misguided and ignorant and beyond the pale of Islam; those among them who have knowledge are even worse. [Al-Subki]

Undoubtedly the famous book Al-Fusoos contains blatant kufr, as does al-Futoohaat al-Makkiyyah. If it is true that he wrote this and continued to believe in it until he died, then he is a kaafir who is doomed to eternity in Hell, no doubt about it. [Abu Zar’ah ibn al-Haafiz al-‘Iraaqi] REFERENCE: Noted Saudi Arabian Scholar Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid says http://islamqa.info/en/ref/7691

Wahdat ul Wajood (Pantheism) , Dr. Israr Ahmed, Tahir ul Qadri, Deoband & Islam - 1


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3qkFqQ6X-g


The Process of an Islamic Revolution By Dr Israr Ahmad





Wahdat ul Wajood (Pantheism) , Dr. Israr Ahmed, Tahir ul Qadri, Deoband & Islam - 2


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn8NL4h-84Y


Pakistan enjoys a especial significance in the context of the contemporary global movement for Islamic revival and renaissance. There are, indeed, a number of indications that Pakistan is destined to play a pivotal role concerning the future of Islam, and that Pakistan will have the honor of leading the Muslim Ummah into an age characterized by the domination of Islam. For instance, unlike the more or less simultaneous movements launched against the yoke of Western imperialism throughout the Muslim world, it was only in the Indian subcontinent that the name of Islam was invoked. Furthermore, any keen student of history can appreciate the veracity of the assertion that, in view of the extremely unfavorable situation prevailing at the time, the establishment of a separate homeland for Muslims in 1947 was nothing short of a miracle. On a deeper level, it should be obvious to all believers that the creation of Pakistan was in direct response to our firm and solemn pledge to Almighty Allah (SWT) __ the pledge that, in case we succeed in gaining our much coveted freedom, we will establish the Islamic System of Social Justice in this country. During the movement for independence, we made public claims that we are going to create a model Islamic state, that we are going to show the entire world the true picture of Islam, and that we are going to demonstrate how the Islamic ideals of human freedom, equality, and fraternity work in real life. REFERENCE: The Process of an Islamic Revolution by Dr. Israr Ahmad http://www.tanzeem.org/resources/articles/articledesc.asp?id=140 Dr. Israr Ahmad Bani Tanzeem-e-Islami (Lecture at Khilafah Confrence 1994, Wembley Hall, London) http://www.tanzeem.org/intro/founder/index.asp